Interventions for the Wellbeing of Students At the University of Helsinki
INSIGHT
Groups 4 Health (Ryhmät Kuntoon) for Mental Well-being: a Feasibility and Controlled Effectiveness Study At the University of Helsinki
1 other identifier
interventional
600
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The psychological, social, and health consequences of psychological ill-being, particularly loneliness, are well-documented among students, which underlines the importance of providing adequate support. Groups 4 Health (G4H) is a promising psychosocial group intervention focused on improving well-being by supporting social connectedness and belonging. In earlier Australian studies G4H has decreased loneliness and social anxiety and increased group memberships significantly more than treatment as usual. When compared to cognitive behavioral therapy G4H has showed continued reduction in the participants' loneliness at the end of the intervention period and in the follow-up. Research on the G4H intervention's effectiveness outside Australia and research on the intervention's cost-effectiveness is lacking. Therefore, this clinical study investigates the feasibility, effectiveness, and cost-effectiveness of the G4H among the University of Helsinki students in Finland. The effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the G4H will be compared to two other active intervention groups: the well-being groups facilitated by the study psychologists at the University of Helsinki and an online course for students' well-being. Effectiveness will also be compared to students who do not participate in any well-being courses or interventions. The investigators hypothesize that all the active intervention groups promote student well-being. Questionnaires and University of Helsinki registry data will be gathered before and after the interventions to evaluate the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of the interventions. The factors that influence the intervention's effectiveness and cost-effectiveness will also be studied. In addition to these research questions, qualitative methods are used to explore the challenges and possibilities identified in the G4H-intervention regarding inclusion and equality.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2022
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 20, 2022
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 2, 2024
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 7, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 31, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 31, 2026
September 19, 2024
September 1, 2024
4.4 years
February 2, 2024
September 6, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Loneliness
Loneliness is measured with the 4 and 8-item short forms of the revised University of California, Los Angeles Loneliness Scale (ULS-4 and ULS-8, response options: 1=never, 2=rarely, 3=sometimes, 4=often, lower score means better outcome).
1) Before the intervention, 2) During the intervention (week 3), 3) immediately after the intervention, 4) one month follow-up, 5) three months follow-up
Depression
Symptoms of depression are assessed with the 9-item Patient Health Questionnaire (response options: 0=not at all, 1=several days, 2=more than half the days, 3=nearly every day, lower score means better outcome).
1) Before the intervention, 3) immediately after the intervention 4) one month follow-up, 5) three months follow-up
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Active group memberships
1) Before the intervention, 3) immediately after the intervention 4) one month follow-up, 5) three months follow-up
Mental well-being
1) Before the intervention, 2) immediately after the intervention 3) one month follow-up, 4) three months follow-up
General well-being
1) Before the intervention, 3) immediately after the intervention 4) one month follow-up, 5) three months follow-up
Anxiety
1) Before the intervention, 3) immediately after the intervention 4) one month follow-up, 5) three months follow-up
Social anxiety
1) Before the intervention, 3) immediately after the intervention 4) one month follow-up, 5) three months follow-u
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (6)
Mood
1) Before the intervention, 2) During the intervention (week 3), 3) immediately after the intervention, 4) one month follow-up, 5) three months follow-up
Identification with the intervention
During intervention (week 3)
Participant adherence
Immediately after each intervention session, during 8 weeks
- +3 more other outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Groups 4 Health (G4H)
EXPERIMENTALGroups 4 Health (G4H, "Ryhmät kuntoon") intervention is administered in this arm.
The study psychologists' group intervention
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe study psychologists' group intervention is administered in this arm.
Towards better well-being and studying -online course
ACTIVE COMPARATOROnline course for students' well-being and studying ("Kohti parempaa opiskelua") is administered in this arm.
No intervention control group
NO INTERVENTIONThe no intervention control group consists of students who are not attending any active interventions for mental well-being or promotion of studying skills.
Interventions
Groups 4 Health, G4H, ("Ryhmät kuntoon") at the University of Helsinki is a manualized group intervention for the students that focuses on social connectedness and aims at improving general health and life satisfaction. G4H groups are facilitated by two psychology MA students (or licensed psychologists) carefully trained for the intervention and mentored by experienced clinical psychologists. G4H consists of five 90 minutes sessions that aim to give participants the knowledge and skills they need to effectively manage their social group memberships and identities. Each session contains exercises and discussions described in the G4H workbook that target different aspects of group life identified within the social identity model of identity change and put the Social Identity Approach to Health -model to practice. Students earn 2 ECTS (European Credit Transfer and Accumulation System) credits for completing the intervention.
University of Helsinki study psychology team organizes group interventions for various challenges of studying for bachelor's and master's students. These groups offer client-centered peer support facilitated by one to two study psychologists. Recurring themes in the groups include: challenges in attentiveness, independent studying, and scientific writing, as well as support for re-entering the studies after a break. The approach in the different thematic groups is largely similar: short presentations, group discussions and practices. These groups have been implemented as both face-to-face and remote meetings. One group typically lasts for a study period and comprises five to six 90 minutes sessions. Typical group size is six to 12 students.
Towards better well-being and studying -online course ("Kohti parempaa opiskelua") is an optional, seven-week online course that aims to foster university students' well-being and study skills. It is available for all University of Helsinki students. The course is based on principles of Acceptance and Commitment therapy and aims to support the development of psychological flexibility. The course takes place in Moodle platform and the students earn 3 ECTS credits for completing it. This course progresses week by week and has six central themes which include individual work in practicing psychological flexibility skills as well as study skills on a weekly basis and weekly group discussion.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Adult (age 18 and above)
- Student in the University of Helsinki, Finland
- Able to speak/read Finnish, Swedish, or English
You may not qualify if:
- \- None
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Helsinkilead
- Strategic Research Council, Finlandcollaborator
- University of Eastern Finlandcollaborator
- Finnish Institute for Health and Welfarecollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Helsinki
Helsinki, Uusimaa, 00014, Finland
Related Publications (25)
Asikainen H, Katajavuori N. Development of a Web-Based Intervention Course to Promote Students' Well-Being and Studying in Universities: Protocol for an Experimental Study Design. JMIR Res Protoc. 2021 Mar 9;10(3):e23613. doi: 10.2196/23613.
PMID: 33687336BACKGROUNDConnor KM, Kobak KA, Churchill LE, Katzelnick D, Davidson JR. Mini-SPIN: A brief screening assessment for generalized social anxiety disorder. Depress Anxiety. 2001;14(2):137-40. doi: 10.1002/da.1055.
PMID: 11668666BACKGROUNDCruwys T, Haslam C, Rathbone JA, Williams E, Haslam SA, Walter ZC. Groups 4 Health versus cognitive-behavioural therapy for depression and loneliness in young people: randomised phase 3 non-inferiority trial with 12-month follow-up. Br J Psychiatry. 2022 Mar;220(3):140-147. doi: 10.1192/bjp.2021.128.
PMID: 35049477BACKGROUNDHaslam C, Holme A, Haslam SA, Iyer A, Jetten J, Williams WH. Maintaining group memberships: social identity continuity predicts well-being after stroke. Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2008 Oct-Dec;18(5-6):671-91. doi: 10.1080/09602010701643449.
PMID: 18924001BACKGROUNDHaslam C, Cruwys T, Haslam SA, Dingle G, Chang MX. Groups 4 Health: Evidence that a social-identity intervention that builds and strengthens social group membership improves mental health. J Affect Disord. 2016 Apr;194:188-95. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2016.01.010. Epub 2016 Jan 21.
PMID: 26828756BACKGROUNDHaslam C, Cruwys T, Chang MX, Bentley SV, Haslam SA, Dingle GA, Jetten J. GROUPS 4 HEALTH reduces loneliness and social anxiety in adults with psychological distress: Findings from a randomized controlled trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2019 Sep;87(9):787-801. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000427.
PMID: 31403815BACKGROUNDHatcher RL, Lindqvist K, Falkenstrom F. Psychometric evaluation of the Working Alliance Inventory-Therapist version: Current and new short forms. Psychother Res. 2020 Jul;30(6):706-717. doi: 10.1080/10503307.2019.1677964. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
PMID: 31621525BACKGROUNDHays RD, DiMatteo MR. A short-form measure of loneliness. J Pers Assess. 1987 Spring;51(1):69-81. doi: 10.1207/s15327752jpa5101_6.
PMID: 3572711BACKGROUNDHeinonen E, Orlinsky DE, Willutzki U, Ronnestad MH, Schroder T, Messina I, Loffler-Stastka H, Hartmann A. Psychotherapist Trainees' Quality of Life: Patterns and Correlates. Front Psychol. 2022 Mar 24;13:864691. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.864691. eCollection 2022.
PMID: 35401345BACKGROUNDKonstabel K, Lonnqvist JE, Leikas S, Garcia Velazquez R, Qin H, Verkasalo M, Walkowitz G. Measuring single constructs by single items: Constructing an even shorter version of the "Short Five" personality inventory. PLoS One. 2017 Aug 11;12(8):e0182714. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0182714. eCollection 2017.
PMID: 28800630BACKGROUNDKroenke K, Spitzer RL, Williams JB. The PHQ-9: validity of a brief depression severity measure. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13. doi: 10.1046/j.1525-1497.2001.016009606.x.
PMID: 11556941BACKGROUNDMcKay MT, Andretta JR. Evidence for the Psychometric Validity, Internal Consistency and Measurement Invariance of Warwick Edinburgh Mental Well-being Scale Scores in Scottish and Irish Adolescents. Psychiatry Res. 2017 Sep;255:382-386. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2017.06.071. Epub 2017 Jun 21.
PMID: 28666244BACKGROUNDPostmes T, Haslam SA, Jans L. A single-item measure of social identification: reliability, validity, and utility. Br J Soc Psychol. 2013 Dec;52(4):597-617. doi: 10.1111/bjso.12006. Epub 2012 Nov 4.
PMID: 23121468BACKGROUNDSpitzer RL, Kroenke K, Williams JB, Lowe B. A brief measure for assessing generalized anxiety disorder: the GAD-7. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7. doi: 10.1001/archinte.166.10.1092.
PMID: 16717171BACKGROUNDWei M, Russell DW, Mallinckrodt B, Vogel DL. The Experiences in Close Relationship Scale (ECR)-short form: reliability, validity, and factor structure. J Pers Assess. 2007 Apr;88(2):187-204. doi: 10.1080/00223890701268041.
PMID: 17437384BACKGROUNDEvans C, Connell J, Audin K, Sinclair A, Barkham M. Rationale and development of a general population well-being measure: Psychometric status of the GP-CORE in a student sample. Br J Guid Counc. 2005;33(2):153-73
BACKGROUNDGuay F, Vallerand RJ, Blanchard C. On the assessment of situational intrinsic and extrinsic motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motiv Emot. 2000;24:175-213.
BACKGROUNDHaslam C, Jetten J, Cruwys T, Dingle G, Haslam SA. The new psychology of health: Unlocking the social cure. Routledge; 2018.
BACKGROUNDHatcher RL, Gillaspy JA. Development and validation of a revised short version of the Working Alliance Inventory. Psychotherapy research. 2006;16(1):12-25.
BACKGROUNDIyer A, Jetten J, Tsivrikos D. Torn Between Identities: Predictors of Adjustment to Identity Change Self Continuity: Individual And Collective Perspectives. Psychology Press, New York, NY, US; 2008.
BACKGROUNDOrlinsky DE, Strauss B, Rønnestad MH, Hill C, Castonguay L, Willutzki U, et al. A collaborative study of development in psychotherapy trainees. Psychotherapy Bulletin. 2015;50(4):21-5.
BACKGROUNDParpala A, Lindblom-Ylänne S. Using a research instrument for developing quality at the university. Quality in Higher Education. 2012;18(3):313-28.
BACKGROUNDSarason IG, Sarason BR, Shearin EN, Pierce GR. A brief measure of social support: Practical and theoretical implications. J Soc Pers Relat. 1987;4(4):497-510.
BACKGROUNDRoberts RE, Lewinsohn PM, Seeley JR. A brief measure of loneliness suitable for use with adolescents. Psychol Rep. 1993 Jun;72(3 Pt 2):1379-91. doi: 10.2466/pr0.1993.72.3c.1379.
PMID: 8337350BACKGROUNDRussell D, Peplau LA, Cutrona CE. The revised UCLA Loneliness Scale: concurrent and discriminant validity evidence. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1980 Sep;39(3):472-80. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.39.3.472.
PMID: 7431205BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jari M Lahti, PhD
University of Helsinki
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 2, 2024
First Posted
August 7, 2024
Study Start
March 20, 2022
Primary Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
July 31, 2026
Last Updated
September 19, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share