NCT06490120

Brief Summary

The goal of this observational study is to increase our knowledge about the mental health of young individuals and to establish a valid and comprehensive method for assessing mental health in young individuals (15-29 years) that can improve our capacity to promote mental health and address mental health problems. The specific aims of the proposed project are: 1) To determine the extent and course of mental health in young men and women over a two-year period and discern the added value of multimodal data to assess and predict mental health problems. 2) To demonstrate the feasibility of different assessment methods of mental health in young individuals. Participants will be able to provide:

  • Survey data - mental health outcome measures are used to assess mental well-being and mental health problems, and sociodemographic and individual health data are collected to explore potential confounders with the primary outcomes.
  • Behavioral testing - online/remote behavioral assessments such as approach-avoidance conflict, emotional regulation, risk-taking-attitude and cognitive tests.
  • National register data - sociodemographic data including age, country of birth, education, school absence, sickness absence and income, inpatient (hospital) and outpatient specialist care, information on e.g. psychiatric conditions and pain conditions and psychiatric care and use of psychotropic medication.
  • Blood-based biological marker - monitoring of about 800 biomarkers, carefully selected to target the most important metabolic pathways, including steroid-, hormone-, neurotransmitter- and lipid regulation.
  • Passive data by digital phenotyping - automatically collected data from for example smartphone sensors and activity logs.
  • App- and survey metadata - app usage, when a survey was opened, time taken to answer separate measures and questions, completion of full survey, and any changes made in survey responses. Researchers will compare 3 different assessment protocols, with participants providing data at different time points, this in order to see demonstrate feasibility and methods for future studies on mental health in young individuals. Establishment of feasibility is done by collecting data on: recruitment rate, adherence and acceptance of study procedures including mode of data collection.

Trial Health

63
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
3,000

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for all trials

Timeline
20mo left

Started Aug 2024

Typical duration for all trials

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress51%
Aug 2024Dec 2027

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

May 31, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 8, 2024

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 12, 2024

Completed
2.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 31, 2027

Expected
9 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

July 8, 2024

Status Verified

June 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

2.6 years

First QC Date

May 31, 2024

Last Update Submit

June 28, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

Mental HealthTrajectoriesMultimodalYoung IndividualsEcological momentary assessment

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Change in anxiety symptoms

    Self-report: Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7). Swedish version. 7 items ranging from 0 ='not at all', to 3 ='almost every day'. 1 item ranging from 0 ='no difficulties, to 3 = 'extreme difficulties'. 1 item ranging from 0 ='not at all, to 3 = 'very disturbing'. The first 7 items are summed to a sum score ranging from 0 to 21, where: 0-4 = no signs of anxiety, 5-9 = mild GAD, 10-14 = moderate GAD, 15-21 = severe GAD. Item 8 is reported as a single item where higher score means higher interference.

    Baseline, 1 year, 2 year for Group 1 and 3

  • Change in anxiety symptoms

    Self-report: Generalised Anxiety Disorder (GAD-7). Swedish version. 7 items ranging from 0 ='not at all', to 3 ='almost every day'. 1 item ranging from 0 ='no difficulties, to 3 = 'extreme difficulties'. 1 item ranging from 0 ='not at all, to 3 = 'very disturbing'. The first 7 items are summed to a sum score ranging from 0 to 21, where: 0-4 = no signs of anxiety, 5-9 = mild GAD, 10-14 = moderate GAD, 15-21 = severe GAD. Item 8 is reported as a single item where higher score means higher interference.

    Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 1.5 years, 2 year for Group 2

  • Change in depressive symptoms

    Self-report: Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9+1), Swedish version. 9 items ranging from 0 ='not at all', to 3 ='almost every day'. 1 item ranging from 0 ='no difficulties, to 3 = 'extreme difficulties'. The first 9 items are summed to a sum score ranging from 0 to 27, where: 0-4 = no signs of depression, 5-9 = mild depression, 10-14 = moderate depression, 15-19 = moderately severe depression, 20-27 = severe depression. Item 10 is reported as a single item where high scores indicate high interference with daily function.

    Baseline, 1 year, 2 year for Group 1 and 3

  • Change in depressive symptoms

    Self-report: Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9+1), Swedish version. 9 items ranging from 0 ='not at all', to 3 ='almost every day'. 1 item ranging from 0 ='no difficulties, to 3 = 'extreme difficulties'. The first 9 items are summed to a sum score ranging from 0 to 27, where: 0-4 = no signs of depression, 5-9 = mild depression, 10-14 = moderate depression, 15-19 = moderately severe depression, 20-27 = severe depression. Item 10 is reported as a single item where high scores indicate high interference with daily function.

    Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 1.5 years, 2 year for Group 2

  • Change in well-being

    Self-report: Well-Being Index (WHO-5). Swedish version. 5 items ranging from 0 ='at no time', to 5 ='all the time'. The 5 items are summed to a score ranging from 0 to 25, 0 representing worst possible and 25 representing best possible quality of life.

    Baseline, 1 year, 2 year for Group 1 and 3

  • Change in well-being

    Self-report: Well-Being Index (WHO-5). Swedish version. 5 items ranging from 0 ='at no time', to 5 ='all the time'. The 5 items are summed to a score ranging from 0 to 25, 0 representing worst possible and 25 representing best possible quality of life.

    Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 1.5 years, 2 year for Group 2

Secondary Outcomes (50)

  • Change in emotional well-being

    Baseline, 1 year, 2 year for Group 1 and 3

  • Change in emotional well-being

    Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 1.5 years, 2 year for Group 2

  • Change in stress

    Baseline, 6 months, 1 year, 1.5 years, 2 year for Group 2

  • Change in stress

    Baseline, 1 year, 2 year for Group 1 and 3

  • Change in sleep

    Baseline, 1 year, 2 year for Group 1 and 3

  • +45 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (24)

  • Feasibility, Recruitment

    Baseline

  • Feasibility, Number of participants that adhere to each assessment protocol (group)

    Throughout the 2 year study period

  • Feasibility, Acceptance of study

    Throughout the 2 year study period

  • +21 more other outcomes

Study Arms (3)

Protocol 1

Mental health is assessed over the course of 2 years, by survey on three occasions: at baseline and follow-ups at 1 and 2 years later.

Other: sampling method

Protocol 2

Mental health is assessed over the course of 2 years, by survey on five occasions: at baseline and 6, 12, 18 and 24 months later.

Other: sampling method

Protocol 3

Mental health is assessed over the course of 2 years, by survey on three occasions: at baseline and follow-ups at 1 and 2 years later. Additionally, a real-time data capture method, ecological momentary assessments (EMA) will be applied directly after baseline and 6, 12 and 18 months later. Participants in group 3 will asked to complete daily registrations using a selection of self-report measures during a one month period. The self-report questions will be distributed via the application with about 5 to 15 questions at a time.

Other: sampling method

Interventions

feasibility outcomes will be compared between the 3 groups

Protocol 1Protocol 2Protocol 3

Eligibility Criteria

Age15 Years - 29 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)
Sampling MethodProbability Sample
Study Population

Men and women in the general population in Sweden aged 15-29 years at recruitment

You may qualify if:

  • age at recruitment
  • ownership of smartphone

You may not qualify if:

  • N/A

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Uppsala University

Uppsala, Sweden

Location

Biospecimen

Retention: SAMPLES WITHOUT DNA

blood samples, analysed for proteomics, metabolomics

MeSH Terms

Conditions

DepressionAnxiety DisordersPsychological Well-Being

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavioral SymptomsBehaviorMental DisordersPersonal Satisfaction

Study Officials

  • Pernilla Åsenlöf, PhD

    Uppsala University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Pernilla Asenlof, PhD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

May 31, 2024

First Posted

July 8, 2024

Study Start

August 12, 2024

Primary Completion (Estimated)

March 31, 2027

Study Completion (Estimated)

December 31, 2027

Last Updated

July 8, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-06

Locations