NCT05093322

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the safety and tolerability of surufatinib, thereby identifying the Maximum Tolerated Dose (MTD) and/or Recommended Phase 2 Dose (RP2D) of surufatinib administered in combination with gemcitabine in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory solid tumors or lymphoma. The study will be conducted in 2 parts.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
13

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for phase_1

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2021

Geographic Reach
1 country

11 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 20, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 26, 2021

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 30, 2021

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 25, 2023

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 25, 2023

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

May 16, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

June 7, 2024

Status Verified

May 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

1.4 years

First QC Date

September 20, 2021

Results QC Date

April 18, 2024

Last Update Submit

May 23, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Number of Patients With Dose-Limiting Toxicities (DLT)

    A DLT was defined as any of following events that were attributable to study treatment (at least possibly related). Adverse events (AE) were graded using National Cancer Institute (NCI) Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE) version 5.0. * Any Grade 3 or greater nonhematological toxicity. * Grade 3 liver enzyme elevation. * Cases of Hy's law. * Any Grade 2 nonhematological toxicity that persisted for \>= 7 days. * Any Grade 4 hypertension. * Grade 3 corrected QT interval prolongation \> 500 millisecond. * Grade 4 thrombocytopenia for \> 7 days. * Grade 3 thrombocytopenia with clinically significant bleeding. * Grade 4 neutropenia that lasted for \> 7 days. * Myelosuppression that caused a delay of \> 7 days in the start of Cycle 2.

    From the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to Day 35 of Cycle 1

  • Number of Patients With Treatment Emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs) by Severity

    The AEs were graded using the NCI CTCAE version 5.0. The CTCAE displays Grades 1 through 5 where, Grade 1= mild, Grade 2= moderate, Grade 3= Severe, Grade 4= life-threatening consequences and Grade 5= death.

    From the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to 30 + 7 days after the last dose of study drug, approximately 19 weeks

  • Number of Patients With Clinically Significant Physical Examination Abnormalities

    Physical examination included patient height, weight, and general condition, as well as an examination of the head, heart, chest (including the lungs), abdomen, extremities, skin, lymph nodes, nervous system, and additional areas/systems as clinically indicated.

    From the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to 30 + 7 days after the last dose of study drug, approximately 19 weeks

  • Number of Patients With Clinically Significant Vital Signs Abnormalities

    Vital signs included systolic blood pressure (BP), diastolic BP, heart rate, height, weight, respiratory rate, and body temperature.

    From the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to 30 + 7 days after the last dose of study drug, approximately 19 weeks

  • Number of Patients With Clinically Significant Laboratory Abnormalities

    Blood and urine samples were collected to determine the clinical chemistry, hematology, and urinalysis laboratory abnormalities.

    From the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to 30 + 7 days after the last dose of study drug, approximately 19 weeks

  • Number of Patients With Clinically Significant 12-Lead Electrocardiogram (ECG) Abnormalities

    Standard 12-lead ECGs were performed after the patient rested for 5 to 10 minutes. The ECG parameters included heart rate, PR interval, RR interval, QT interval, QTcF, and QRS interval from the triplicate 12-lead ECG.

    From the first dose of study drug (Day 1) up to 30 + 7 days after the last dose of study drug, approximately 19 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Objective Response Rate (ORR)

    RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study treatment), Day 1 of Cycle 3 and until confirmed objective disease progression. Up to approximately 19 weeks.

  • Disease Control Rate (DCR)

    RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study treatment), Day 1 of Cycle 3 and until confirmed objective disease progression. Up to approximately 19 weeks.

  • Time to Response (TTR)

    RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study treatment), Day 1 of Cycle 3 and until confirmed objective disease progression. Up to approximately 19 weeks.

  • Duration of Response (DoR)

    RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study treatment), Day 1 of Cycle 3 and until confirmed objective disease progression. Up to approximately 19 weeks.

  • Progression-Free Survival (PFS)

    RECIST assessments performed at baseline (within 28 days before start of study treatment), Day 1 of Cycle 3 and until confirmed objective disease progression. Up to approximately 19 weeks.

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Part 1- Dose escalation

EXPERIMENTAL

Dose escalation study with sequential dose escalation of surufatinib in combination with gemcitabine. Patients with any recurrent or refractory solid tumors or lymphoma, who have a known or expected dysfunction of VEGFR-1, -2, and -3; FGFR-1; or CSF-1R pathways may be enrolled.

Drug: Surufatinib in combination with Gemcitabine

Part 2 - Dose expansion

EXPERIMENTAL

Once the MTD/RP2D has been determined in the part 1 portion of the study, the part 2 disease specific cohorts for patients with refractory or recurrent osteosarcoma, Ewing Sarcoma, and RMS and NRSTS will open for enrollment.

Drug: Surufatinib in combination with Gemcitabine

Interventions

Surufatinib in combination with Gemcitabine

Also known as: HMPL-012, sulfatinib in combination with Gemcitabine
Part 1- Dose escalationPart 2 - Dose expansion

Eligibility Criteria

Age2 Years - 18 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Age: At time of study enrollment, patients must be
  • For US Sites:
  • Part 1 (including PK expansion cohort): ≥2 and \<18 years of age;
  • Part 2: ≥2 and ≤18 years of age;
  • For EU/UK Sites:
  • Part 1 (including PK expansion cohort): from birth to \<18 years of age;
  • Part 2: from birth to \<18 years of age (except as noted below);
  • Note: Patients \<2 years of age will only be enrolled in Europe, however, enrollment of patients \<2 years of age will not begin until definitive juvenile animal toxicity data is available.
  • Diagnosis:
  • Part 1 - Patients with any recurrent or refractory solid tumors or lymphoma (not central nervous system \[CNS\]) that have a known or expected dysfunction of VEGFR 1, -2, and -3; FGFR-1, or CSF-1R pathways (based on literature) are eligible. Patients must have had histologic verification of malignancy at original diagnosis or relapse.
  • Part 2 - Recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma (US and EU), Ewing sarcoma (US and EU), RMS (US and EU), or NRSTS (EU only). Patients must have had histologic verification of malignancy at original diagnosis or relapse.
  • Disease status: Patients must have measureable or evaluable disease for part 1 dose escalation; for part 2, patients must have measurable disease by RECIST version 1.1.
  • Therapeutic options: Patient's current disease state must be one for which there is no known curative therapy.
  • Performance level: Karnofsky ≥50 for patients ≥16 and \<18 years of age and Lansky ≥50 for patients \<16 years of age, Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) ≤2 for patients ≥18 years of age.
  • Adequate organ and bone marrow function as defined in the current protocol.
  • +3 more criteria

You may not qualify if:

  • Pregnant, breast feeding or planning on becoming pregnant.
  • Patients is taking and prohibitive concomitant medications as outlined in the current protocol.
  • Patients have an uncontrolled infection.
  • Patients has had major surgery or significant traumatic injury within 28 days of the first dose.
  • Brain metastases and/or spinal cord compression untreated with surgery and/or radiotherapy and without clinical imaging evidence of SD for 14 days or longer.
  • History of allergies to Surufatinib and/or Gemcitabine.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (11)

Children's Hospital of Alabama

Birmingham, Alabama, 35233, United States

Location

Childrens Hospital Orange County

Orange, California, 92868, United States

Location

Children's National Hospital

Washington D.C., District of Columbia, 20010, United States

Location

Riley Hospital for Children

Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States

Location

Johns Hopkins University

Baltimore, Maryland, 21287, United States

Location

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Location

Cincinnati Children's Hospital Medical Center

Cincinnati, Ohio, 45229, United States

Location

Children's Hospital of Philadelphia

Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States

Location

UPMC Children's Hospital of Pittsburgh

Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, 15224, United States

Location

The University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center

Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States

Location

Seattle Children's Hospital

Seattle, Washington, 98105, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

LymphomaOsteosarcomaSarcoma, EwingRhabdomyosarcomaSarcoma

Interventions

surufatinibGemcitabine

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsLymphoproliferative DisordersLymphatic DiseasesHemic and Lymphatic DiseasesImmunoproliferative DisordersImmune System DiseasesNeoplasms, Bone TissueNeoplasms, Connective TissueNeoplasms, Connective and Soft TissueMyosarcomaNeoplasms, Muscle Tissue

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Heterocyclic CompoundsDeoxycytidineCytidinePyrimidine NucleosidesPyrimidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-Ring

Results Point of Contact

Title
Nick Lawn
Organization
HUTCHMED Limited

Study Officials

  • Josephine Haduong

    Children's Hospital of Orange County

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 1
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SEQUENTIAL
Model Details: The study will be conducted in 2 parts: Part 1 - evaluation of tolerability and safety of surufatinib administered in combination with gemcitabine, and confirmation of the recommended clinical dose of surufatinib in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory solid tumors or lymphoma. Part 2 - evaluation of anti-tumor activity and confirmation of tolerability of surufatinib administered in combination with gemcitabine in pediatric patients with recurrent or refractory osteosarcoma, Ewing sarcoma, RMS, and NRSTS.
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR
Expanded Access
Yes

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 20, 2021

First Posted

October 26, 2021

Study Start

November 30, 2021

Primary Completion

April 25, 2023

Study Completion

April 25, 2023

Last Updated

June 7, 2024

Results First Posted

May 16, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-05

Locations