MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING in Superficial Soft Tissue Masses

NCT05079997 | Unknown

• 1 other identifier: mri in soft tissue
• Study Type: observational
• Target: 50
• Locations: 0 countries
• Sites: N/A

Brief Summary

This study responds to these raise up questions: Can we use Diffusion Weighted MR complemented with numerical ADC values \& in association with routine MRI in the discrimination between different malignant and benign superficial soft tissue masses.

Conditions

Soft Tissue Masses

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• benign and malignant masses

  The discrimination between benign and malignant superficial soft tissue mass by Non invasive available technique

  from october 2021 to october2022

Secondary Outcomes (1)

• Type of malignant superficial soft tissue masses

  From October 2021 to October 2022

Other Outcomes (1)

• Local invasion of malignant superficial soft tissue masses

  From October 2021 to October 2022

Interventions

MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING DEVICE

s a medical imaging technique used in radiology to form pictures of the anatomy and the physiological processes of the body. MRI scanners use strong magnetic fields, magnetic field gradients, and radio waves to generate images of the organs in the body. MRI does not involve X-rays or the use of ionizing radiation, which distinguishes it from CT and PET scans. MRI is a medical application of nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) which can also be used for imaging in other NMR applications, such as NMR spectroscopy.

Eligibility Criteria

• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: No
• Age Groups: Child (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
• Sampling Method: Non-Probability Sample

Study Population

patients with superficial soft tissue masses

You may qualify if:

• patients with superficial soft tissue masses clinically
• patients underwent us detection of superficial soft tissue masses
• uncharactized superficial soft tissue mass by other modalities

You may not qualify if:

• MRI claustrophobia
• recurrent cases
• patients under treatment

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Assiut University: lead

Related Publications (19)

• Song Y, Yoon YC, Chong Y, Seo SW, Choi YL, Sohn I, Kim MJ. Diagnostic performance of conventional MRI parameters and apparent diffusion coefficient values in differentiating between benign and malignant soft-tissue tumours. Clin Radiol. 2017 Aug;72(8):691.e1-691.e10. doi: 10.1016/j.crad.2017.02.003. Epub 2017 Mar 6.

  PMID: 28274509 BACKGROUND

• Thawait GK, Subhawong TK, Tatizawa Shiga NY, Fayad LM. "Cystic"-appearing soft tissue masses: what is the role of anatomic, functional, and metabolic MR imaging techniques in their characterization? J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Mar;39(3):504-11. doi: 10.1002/jmri.24314. Epub 2013 Oct 22.

  PMID: 24532375 BACKGROUND

• Toprak H, Kilic E, Serter A, Kocakoc E, Ozgocmen S. Ultrasound and Doppler US in Evaluation of Superficial Soft-tissue Lesions. J Clin Imaging Sci. 2014 Feb 27;4:12. doi: 10.4103/2156-7514.127965. eCollection 2014.

  PMID: 24744969 BACKGROUND

• Calleja M, Dimigen M, Saifuddin A. MRI of superficial soft tissue masses: analysis of features useful in distinguishing between benign and malignant lesions. Skeletal Radiol. 2012 Dec;41(12):1517-24. doi: 10.1007/s00256-012-1385-6. Epub 2012 Apr 12.

  PMID: 22491777 BACKGROUND

• Herneth AM, Ringl H, Memarsadeghi M, Fueger B, Friedrich KM, Krestan C, Imhof H. Diffusion weighted imaging in osteoradiology. Top Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Jun;18(3):203-12. doi: 10.1097/RMR.0b013e3180cac61d.

  PMID: 17762384 BACKGROUND

• Panicek DM, Gatsonis C, Rosenthal DI, Seeger LL, Huvos AG, Moore SG, Caudry DJ, Palmer WE, McNeil BJ. CT and MR imaging in the local staging of primary malignant musculoskeletal neoplasms: Report of the Radiology Diagnostic Oncology Group. Radiology. 1997 Jan;202(1):237-46. doi: 10.1148/radiology.202.1.8988217.

  PMID: 8988217 BACKGROUND

• Fayad LM, Jacobs MA, Wang X, Carrino JA, Bluemke DA. Musculoskeletal tumors: how to use anatomic, functional, and metabolic MR techniques. Radiology. 2012 Nov;265(2):340-56. doi: 10.1148/radiol.12111740.

  PMID: 23093707 BACKGROUND

• Kransdorf MJ, Murphey MD. Radiologic evaluation of soft-tissue masses: a current perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2000 Sep;175(3):575-87. doi: 10.2214/ajr.175.3.1750575. No abstract available.

  PMID: 10954433 BACKGROUND

• Gielen JL, De Schepper AM, Vanhoenacker F, Parizel PM, Wang XL, Sciot R, Weyler J. Accuracy of MRI in characterization of soft tissue tumors and tumor-like lesions. A prospective study in 548 patients. Eur Radiol. 2004 Dec;14(12):2320-30. doi: 10.1007/s00330-004-2431-0. Epub 2004 Jul 29.

  PMID: 15290067 BACKGROUND

• Kauppinen RA. Monitoring cytotoxic tumour treatment response by diffusion magnetic resonance imaging and proton spectroscopy. NMR Biomed. 2002 Feb;15(1):6-17. doi: 10.1002/nbm.742.

  PMID: 11840548 BACKGROUND

• Baur A, Reiser MF. Diffusion-weighted imaging of the musculoskeletal system in humans. Skeletal Radiol. 2000 Oct;29(10):555-62. doi: 10.1007/s002560000243.

  PMID: 11127677 BACKGROUND

• Szafer A, Zhong J, Gore JC. Theoretical model for water diffusion in tissues. Magn Reson Med. 1995 May;33(5):697-712. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910330516.

  PMID: 7596275 BACKGROUND

• Subhawong TK, Jacobs MA, Fayad LM. Insights into quantitative diffusion-weighted MRI for musculoskeletal tumor imaging. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2014 Sep;203(3):560-72. doi: 10.2214/AJR.13.12165.

  PMID: 25148158 BACKGROUND

• Padhani AR, Liu G, Koh DM, Chenevert TL, Thoeny HC, Takahara T, Dzik-Jurasz A, Ross BD, Van Cauteren M, Collins D, Hammoud DA, Rustin GJ, Taouli B, Choyke PL. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging as a cancer biomarker: consensus and recommendations. Neoplasia. 2009 Feb;11(2):102-25. doi: 10.1593/neo.81328.

  PMID: 19186405 BACKGROUND

• Ross BD, Moffat BA, Lawrence TS, Mukherji SK, Gebarski SS, Quint DJ, Johnson TD, Junck L, Robertson PL, Muraszko KM, Dong Q, Meyer CR, Bland PH, McConville P, Geng H, Rehemtulla A, Chenevert TL. Evaluation of cancer therapy using diffusion magnetic resonance imaging. Mol Cancer Ther. 2003 Jun;2(6):581-7.

  PMID: 12813138 BACKGROUND

• Costa FM, Ferreira EC, Vianna EM. Diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging for the evaluation of musculoskeletal tumors. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am. 2011 Feb;19(1):159-80. doi: 10.1016/j.mric.2010.10.007.

  PMID: 21129640 BACKGROUND

• Gonzalez RG, Schaefer PW, Buonanno FS, Schwamm LH, Budzik RF, Rordorf G, Wang B, Sorensen AG, Koroshetz WJ. Diffusion-weighted MR imaging: diagnostic accuracy in patients imaged within 6 hours of stroke symptom onset. Radiology. 1999 Jan;210(1):155-62. doi: 10.1148/radiology.210.1.r99ja02155.

  PMID: 9885601 BACKGROUND

• Nagata S, Nishimura H, Uchida M, Sakoda J, Tonan T, Hiraoka K, Nagata K, Akiba J, Abe T, Hayabuchi N. Diffusion-weighted imaging of soft tissue tumors: usefulness of the apparent diffusion coefficient for differential diagnosis. Radiat Med. 2008 Jun;26(5):287-95. doi: 10.1007/s11604-008-0229-8. Epub 2008 Jul 27.

  PMID: 18661213 BACKGROUND

• Maeda M, Matsumine A, Kato H, Kusuzaki K, Maier SE, Uchida A, Takeda K. Soft-tissue tumors evaluated by line-scan diffusion-weighted imaging: influence of myxoid matrix on the apparent diffusion coefficient. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2007 Jun;25(6):1199-204. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20931.

  PMID: 17520732 BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Magnetic Resonance Imaging

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Tomography; Diagnostic Imaging; Diagnostic Techniques and Procedures; Diagnosis

Central Study Contacts

Fatma Alzahraa mohamed hassan

CONTACT

01004009026; fatma.mohamed9071995@gmail.com

Study Design

• Study Type: observational
• Observational Model: COHORT
• Time Perspective: PROSPECTIVE
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: resident

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: September 26, 2021
• First Posted: October 15, 2021
• Study Start: October 1, 2021
• Primary Completion: October 1, 2022
• Study Completion: March 1, 2023
• Last Updated: October 15, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-10