Conventional MRI Versus MR Arthrography in Evaluation of Ankle Impingement Syndromes and Intra Articular Pathologies.
Conventional Magnetic Resonance Imaging Versus Magnetic Resonance Arthrography in Evaluation of Ankle Impingement Syndromes and Intra Articular Pathologies.
1 other identifier
observational
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Chronic ankle pain is a common clinical problem with a wide differential diagnosis. Soft-tissue and osseous impingement syndromes are now increasingly recognized as a significant cause of chronic ankle pain. Ankle impingement syndromes are defined as pathologic conditions resulting in chronic, painful restriction to movement at the tibiotalar articulation secondary to soft-tissue or osseous abnormalities. Ankle impingement is classified according to its anatomic relationship to the tibiotalar joint as anterolateral, anterior, anteromedial, posteromedial, or posterior impingement.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Sep 2020
Typical duration for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 23, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 4, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 10, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2022
CompletedAugust 1, 2022
July 1, 2021
2.1 years
February 23, 2019
July 29, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Ligamentous disruption and thickening.
to detect the ligamentous disruption and thickening by conventional MRI and direct MR arthrography of the ankle joint.
base line
Capsular thickening and synovitis.
to detect the capsular thickening and synovitis by conventional MRI and direct MR arthrography of the ankle joint.
baseline
Secondary Outcomes (1)
correlate the findings of conventional MRI and MR Arthrography of the ankle with clinical and operative findings.
baseline
Interventions
all patient will undergo Magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic imaging arthrography of the ankle joint.
Eligibility Criteria
Patients in different age groups and both sex clinically presented with chronic ankle pain.
You may qualify if:
- patients in different age groups and both sex referred from orthopedic outpatient clinic with chronic ankle pain and suspected clinically to have impingement syndrome.
You may not qualify if:
- Inflammatory arthritis of ankle joint, infection in ankle joint, neoplasm around ankle joint.
- Patients with contraindications for MRI, e.g. an implanted magnetic device, pacemakers or claustrophobia.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Faculty of medicine
Asyut, 71111, Egypt
Related Publications (10)
Steinbach LS, Palmer WE, Schweitzer ME. Special focus session. MR arthrography. Radiographics. 2002 Sep-Oct;22(5):1223-46. doi: 10.1148/radiographics.22.5.g02se301223.
PMID: 12235350BACKGROUNDMosier-La Clair SM, Monroe MT, Manoli A. Medial impingement syndrome of the anterior tibiotalar fascicle of the deltoid ligament on the talus. Foot Ankle Int. 2000 May;21(5):385-91. doi: 10.1177/107110070002100505.
PMID: 10830656RESULTRobinson P, White LM, Salonen D, Ogilvie-Harris D. Anteromedial impingement of the ankle: using MR arthrography to assess the anteromedial recess. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2002 Mar;178(3):601-4. doi: 10.2214/ajr.178.3.1780601.
PMID: 11856682RESULTDonovan A, Rosenberg ZS. Extraarticular lateral hindfoot impingement with posterior tibial tendon tear: MRI correlation. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2009 Sep;193(3):672-8. doi: 10.2214/AJR.08.2215.
PMID: 19696280RESULTMurawski CD, Kennedy JG. Anteromedial impingement in the ankle joint: outcomes following arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Oct;38(10):2017-24. doi: 10.1177/0363546510369335. Epub 2010 May 17.
PMID: 20479141RESULTGiannini S, Buda R, Mosca M, Parma A, Di Caprio F. Posterior ankle impingement. Foot Ankle Int. 2013 Mar;34(3):459-65. doi: 10.1177/1071100713477609.
PMID: 23520307RESULTHayashi D, Roemer FW, D'Hooghe P, Guermazi A. Posterior ankle impingement in athletes: Pathogenesis, imaging features and differential diagnoses. Eur J Radiol. 2015 Nov;84(11):2231-41. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2015.07.017. Epub 2015 Jul 17.
PMID: 26239710RESULTPaterson RS, Brown JN. The posteromedial impingement lesion of the ankle. A series of six cases. Am J Sports Med. 2001 Sep-Oct;29(5):550-7. doi: 10.1177/03635465010290050501.
PMID: 11573911RESULTHaller J, Bernt R, Seeger T, Weissenback A, Tuchler H, Resnick D. MR-imaging of anterior tibiotalar impingement syndrome: agreement, sensitivity and specificity of MR-imaging and indirect MR-arthrography. Eur J Radiol. 2006 Jun;58(3):450-60. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2006.03.008. Epub 2006 Apr 18.
PMID: 16621392RESULTRobinson P, White LM, Salonen DC, Daniels TR, Ogilvie-Harris D. Anterolateral ankle impingement: mr arthrographic assessment of the anterolateral recess. Radiology. 2001 Oct;221(1):186-90. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2211001666.
PMID: 11568338RESULT
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Kawsar Mohamed
Assiut University
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE ONLY
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- principal Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 23, 2019
First Posted
March 4, 2019
Study Start
September 10, 2020
Primary Completion
September 30, 2022
Study Completion
December 30, 2022
Last Updated
August 1, 2022
Record last verified: 2021-07