MLX/XLX ACR Expandable Lumbar Interbody Implants
An Assessment of the Safety and Performance of the MLX® Medial Lateral and XLX ACR® Expandable Lumbar Interbody Implants for the Treatment of Patients With Degenerative Conditions of the Thoracic and/or Lumbar Spine
1 other identifier
observational
109
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of thoracic and/or lumbar spine surgery using the MLX and XLX ACR interbody implants as measured by reported complications, radiographic outcomes, and clinical patient outcomes. This study is being undertaken to identify possible residual risks and to clarify mid- to long-term clinical performance that may affect the benefit/risk ratios of the MLX and XLX ACR interbody implants.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jan 2020
Shorter than P25 for all trials
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 27, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 2, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 9, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 23, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 23, 2020
CompletedDecember 22, 2025
December 1, 2025
9 months
June 2, 2020
December 16, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Rate of Complications
Rate of complications (i.e., safety) attributable to use of the associated interbody implants (MLX or XLX ACR)
At least three months
Proportion of Subjects with Improvement in Neurological Symptoms
The rate of improvement as compared to baseline in preoperative neurological symptoms will be measured using a standard motor/sensory neurological exam.
At least three months
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of Subjects with Apparent Radiographic Fusion
12 months or greater
Study Arms (2)
MLX - Medial Lateral Expandable Lumbar Interbody System
Patients who underwent lumbar interbody fusion with the MLX expandable interbody implant will be included in the MLX - Medial Lateral Expandable Lumbar Interbody System cohort.
XLX ACR Interbody System
Patients who underwent lumbar interbody fusion with the XLX ACR expandable interbody implant will be included in the XLX ACR Interbody System cohort.
Eligibility Criteria
At least 90 (75 MLX, 15 XLX ACR) subjects will be enrolled in this multicenter study by at least four investigative sites. A site may have more than one surgeon investigator contributing to the total site enrollment. As a retrospective study, enrollment goals will be determined with the surgeon investigator during site selection by the Sponsor and will be based on available case volume. The site will identify potential subjects who are more than three months from the surgery postoperative time point during the study duration for inclusion in the study.
You may qualify if:
- Patients who were ≥18 years of age at the time of surgery
- Underwent spine surgery using either MLX or XLX ACR interbody implant (NuVasive, Inc., San Diego, CA) at:
- One or two adjacent thoracic and/or lumbar levels for degenerative disc disease or degenerative spondylolisthesis, or
- Any number of thoracic and/or lumbar levels for degenerative scoliosis (defined as \>10º coronal curve)
- Interbody fusion with autograft and/or allograft (i.e., cancellous and/or corticocancellous allograft bone)
- NuVasive supplemental internal fixation cleared by the applicable regulatory body for use in the thoracolumbar spine
You may not qualify if:
- Use of any bone graft with the associated interbody implant that is not FDA-cleared for use within interbody implants.
- Examples of these include:
- Bone morphogenetic protein (BMP) (e.g., Infuse (Medtronic))
- Synthetic bone graft extenders (e.g., AttraX (NuVasive), Formagraft (NuVasive), Mastergraft (Medtronic), Vitoss (Stryker), Actifuse (Baxter), nanOss (RTI Surgical), Fibergraft (Prosidyan/Depuy Synthes), ChronOs (Depuy Synthes))
- Demineralized bone matrices (DBM) regulated as medical devices by the FDA (e.g., Grafton Putty/Gel (Medtronic), DBX (MTF/Depuy Synthes), Accell Evo3 (IsoTis), Propel Putty/Gel (NuVasive))
- Peptide enhanced bone graft (e.g., iFactor (Cerapedics))
- Previous lumbar fusion surgery at the currently treated level(s) (adjacent-level surgery is acceptable)
- Systemic or local infection (latent or active) or signs of local inflammation documented at the time of surgery
- Patient was involved in active litigation relating to the spine during the surgical/postoperative period (worker's compensation claim is allowed if it is not contested)
- Inadequate bone stock or bone quality documented at the time of surgery
- Known sensitivity to materials implanted documented at the time of surgery
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- NuVasivelead
Study Sites (4)
Orthopaedic Specialty Institute
Orange, California, 92868, United States
Lyerly Neurosurgery
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207, United States
Carolina NeuroSurgery & Spine Associates
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28204, United States
OrthoCarolina Research Institute
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Kyle Malone, MS
NuVasive
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- RETROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 2, 2020
First Posted
June 9, 2020
Study Start
January 27, 2020
Primary Completion
October 23, 2020
Study Completion
October 23, 2020
Last Updated
December 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12