Rate of Bony Fusion Using NanoBone® Synthetic Bone Graft Versus Local Autologous Bone Graft.
BONE
Comparison of Fusion Success Between NanoBone Synthetic Bone Graft and Local Autogenous Bone Graft in Posterolateral Spinal Fusion
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objectives of this longitudinal study are to assess and measure fusion status (fused or not fused) and rate of bony fusion using NanoBone® Synthetic Bone Graft in patients requiring one to two level lumbar posterolateral fusion procedures with or without commercially available rigid spinal instrumentation. Our hypothesis is that the Nanobone synthetic bone graft will be as effective at creating a fusion in the lumbar spine as compared with a local bone graft. Each subject will serve as their own control during this study, as patients will receive the Nanobone graft on the right side of their spine and the local bone graft on their left side.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2021
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 29, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 4, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 19, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 30, 2025
CompletedFebruary 12, 2025
February 1, 2025
3.5 years
October 29, 2020
February 11, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Radiographic Fusion
Fusion will be defined as: * Evidence of bridging trabecular bone between the transverse processes of the involved vertebral bodies * Translational motion \< 3.5mm on flexion/extension radiographs; and * Angular motion \<5 degrees on flexion/extension radiographs.
12 months
Oswestry Disability Index (ODI) 0% lowest, no disability to 100% disabled, bedridden
Change from pre-operative score
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Visual Analog Scale (VAS) 0-no pain to 10-worst possible pain
12 months
SF-36 (Short Form 36)
12 months
Study Arms (1)
Single arm subject is own control
OTHERPosterolateral fusion is bilateral, patients will receive the Nanobone graft on the right side of their spine and the local bone graft on their left side.
Interventions
Nanobone® Synthetic Bone Graft is a nanocrystalline hydroxyapatite imbedded in a silica gel matrix. The nanocrystalline structure accurately replicates autologous hydroxyapatite and the silica gel matrix that rapidly transforms into an osteogenic matrix post-implantation. NanoBone promotes remodeling by acting as a strong osteoinductive material. NanoBone® is available as a putty.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The individual has signed and dated a study specific informed consent form approved by the Institutional Review Board at UMMHC.
- The individual is 18 to 85 years of age.
- The individual is skeletally mature.
- The individual has been diagnosed with 1 or 2 level degenerative disc disease or spondylolisthesis grade 1-3 with or without spinal stenosis, requiring posterolateral spinal fusion surgery with bone grafting.
- The individual is physically and mentally willing and able to comply with the postoperative scheduled clinical and radiographic evaluations and rehabilitation.
You may not qualify if:
- The individual has had any previous attempts at fusion, at any lumbar levels.
- The individual is morbidly obese (defined as 100 lbs over the recommended ideal weight as described in the Metropolitan Life Height and Weight Tables for Men and Women and or having a BMI \>39).
- Patients with osteopenia, osteoporosis, or osteomalacia to a degree that spinal instrumentation would be contraindicated.
- Patients with systemic collagen, bone or mineralization dysfunction (such as Paget's disease, osteogenesis imperfecta, Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome).
- Patients who suffer from uncontrolled diabetes mellitus type I or insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus type II. (definition based on the glycosylated Haemoglobin level)
- Patients who are suffering from autoimmune disease.
- Patients who previously underwent chemotherapy, immunosuppressive disease or radiation to the local area.
- Patients who received or are currently receiving corticosteroids (\> 2 years \> 5 mg prednisolone equivalent/d).
- Patients with active local or systemic infection.
- Patients with any known active malignancy.
- Patients with other concurrent physical or mental conditions which are likely to affect their outcome.
- Patient unable to consent for themselves
- Pregnant women
- Non-English speaking subjects. These subjects are excluded because they would not be able to complete the English-language surveys required during this study. Only English language versions of these surveys have been validated.
- Prisoners
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Artoss Inc.lead
Study Sites (1)
UMass Memorial Health Care
Worcester, Massachusetts, 01605, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Patrick Connelly, MD
UMass Memorial Health
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 29, 2020
First Posted
November 4, 2020
Study Start
July 19, 2021
Primary Completion
December 31, 2024
Study Completion
April 30, 2025
Last Updated
February 12, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-02