Cervical Interbody Implant Study
A Prospective, Multicenter Study Evaluating the Safety and Performance of Interbody Implants for the Treatment of Patients With Degenerative Conditions of the Cervical Spine
1 other identifier
observational
150
1 country
7
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the safety and performance of cervical spine surgery using interbody implants as measured by reported complications, radiographic outcomes, and patient-reported outcomes (PROs).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Jul 2020
Longer than P75 for all trials
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 7, 2020
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 28, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 30, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2025
CompletedDecember 22, 2025
December 1, 2025
5.5 years
December 28, 2020
December 16, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Complications of Interbody Implants
Rate of complications (i.e., safety) attributable to the use of the interbody implants to be studied.
24 months
Radiographic Fusion Success
The proportion of subjects with apparent radiographic fusion (i.e., performance) of the index surgical level(s) at 24 months postoperative.
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Percentage of subjects meeting minimal clinically important difference (MCID) as compared to baseline for neck/arm pain measured by visual analog scale (VAS).
24 months
Percentage of subjects meeting minimal clinically important difference (MCID) as compared to baseline for disability measured by the neck disability index.
24 months
Percentage of subjects meeting minimal clinically important difference (MCID) as compared to baseline measured by overall physical and mental health from PROMIS-10.
24 months
Percentage of subjects meeting Substantial clinical benefit (SCB) as compared to baseline for disability measured by the neck disability index (NDI).
24 months
Percentage of subject meeting Substantial Clinical Benefit (SCB) as compared to baseline for neck/arm pain measured by visual analog scale (VAS).
24 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Cohere Cervical
Modulus Cervical
Eligibility Criteria
The Enrolled Population will include all subjects who meet the criteria for enrollment, specifically, those subjects who: * Satisfied the inclusion and exclusion criteria * Signed the informed consent * Underwent the surgical procedure, as defined in this protocol Subjects not meeting any of these criteria will not be considered enrolled in the study, and therefore not included in any study population or analysis.
You may qualify if:
- Patients who are ≥18 years of age at the time of consent
- Have a planned spine surgery using interbody implants at one or more cervical levels (C2-T1) for degenerative disc disease and/or cervical spinal instability
- Using one of the following implants (NuVasive, Inc., San Diego, CA):
- Cohere Cervical
- Modulus Cervical
- With interbody fusion using autograft and/or allograft (i.e., cancellous and/or corticocancellous allograft bone) and NuVasive supplemental internal fixation cleared by the applicable regulatory body for use in the cervical spine
- Able to undergo surgery based on physical exam, medical history, and surgeon judgment
- Understands the conditions of enrollment, is willing to follow medical advice including postoperative activity restrictions per the surgeon's standard of care, and is willing to sign an informed consent form to participate in the study
You may not qualify if:
- Use of any bone graft that is not cleared by the applicable regulatory body for use within interbody implants. Examples of these include:
- Bone morphogenic protein (BMP) (i.e., Infuse (Medtronic))
- Synthetic bone graft extenders (e.g., Formagraft (NuVasive), Mastergraft (Medtronic), Vitoss (Stryker), Actifuse (Baxter), nanOss (RTI Surgical), Fibergraft (Prosidyan/Depuy Synthes), and ChronOs (Depuy Synthes))
- Demineralized bone matrices (DBM) regulated as medical devices by the FDA (e.g., Grafton Putty/Gel (Medtronic), DBX (MTF/Depuy Synthes), Accell Evo3 (IsoTis), and Propel Putty/Gel (NuVasive))
- Peptide enhanced bone graft (e.g., iFactor (Cerapedics))
- Previous cervical fusion surgery at the level(s) to be treated (adjacent level surgery is acceptable; prior decompression is acceptable)
- Patient is involved in active litigation relating to the spine (worker's compensation claim is allowed if it is not contested)
- Use of bone growth stimulators postoperatively
- Active smoking within 6 weeks before surgery
- Patient has known sensitivity to the materials implanted
- Systemic or local infection (latent or active) or signs of local inflammation
- Patient has inadequate bone stock or bone quality, or a physical or medical condition that would prohibit beneficial surgical outcome based on surgeon judgment
- Patient is a prisoner
- Patient is participating in another clinical study that would confound study data
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- NuVasivelead
Study Sites (7)
Orthopedic Specialty Institute
Orange, California, 92868, United States
Hartford Healthcare Bone and Joint Institute
Hartford, Connecticut, 06106, United States
Mass General Brigham
Somerville, Massachusetts, 02145, United States
Columbia Orthopedic Group Research
Columbia, Missouri, 65201, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Summa Health
Akron, Ohio, 44320, United States
University of Virginia
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22908, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Kyle Malone, MS
Globus Medical
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 28, 2020
First Posted
December 30, 2020
Study Start
July 7, 2020
Primary Completion
December 31, 2025
Study Completion
December 31, 2025
Last Updated
December 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share