Advanced Materials Science in XLIF Study
AMS in XLIF
A Prospective Multicenter Study Evaluating the Effect of Implant Material and/or Surface Structure on Progression of Fusion in XLIF® Surgery
1 other identifier
observational
300
1 country
15
Brief Summary
This study is being conducted to evaluate the clinical and radiographic outcomes of three different interbody implant types when used with cancellous allograft chips with BMA or cellular allograft in patients undergoing XLIF surgery. The study will evaluate success by comparing the rate of fusion, complications profile, and any relationships between clinical outcomes (pain and function) and radiographic outcomes (fusion rate) between the three implant groups.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Aug 2018
Longer than P75 for all trials
15 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 19, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 24, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 28, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2026
ExpectedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2026
December 22, 2025
December 1, 2025
7.9 years
August 24, 2018
December 16, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Radiographic Fusion Success
The proportion of subjects with apparent radiographic fusion at or before 24 months within each treatment group
24 months
Secondary Outcomes (4)
MCID and SCB threshold for each PRO: VAS (back/leg pain), ODI, and EQ-5D, within each treatment group
3, 6, 12, and 24 months
Fusion Rates at Follow-up Timepoints
6, 12, 24 months
Maintenance of Radiographic Correction
3, 6, 12, and 24 months
Complications
3, 6, 12, and 24 months
Study Arms (3)
Smooth PEEK Interbody Implants in XLIF
Smooth PEEK interbody implants for XLIF (with allograft chips and BMA or cancellous allograft) provide maximum surface area and structural stability with large central apertures to allow bony through-growth. Multiple length options enable optimal apophyseal support, thus reducing the chance of subsidence. Additionally, lordotic profiles are available to induce proper sagittal alignment.
3D-Printed Titanium Interbody Implants in XLIF
3D-printed, fully porous titanium interbody implants for XLIF (with allograft chips and BMA or cancellous allograft) have a porous architecture that mimics the porosity and stiffness of bone for reduced stress shielding and improved radiographic imaging. The advanced microporous surface topography creates an ideal environment for bone in-growth.
Porous PEEK Interbody Implants in XLIF
Porous PEEK interbody implants for XLIF (with allograft chips and BMA or cancellous allograft) combine the osseointegration capabilities of porous metal implants with the favorable imaging and mechanical properties of traditional PEEK implants. The Porous PEEK architecture, with 60% porosity and 300 mm average pore size, is specifically tailored to elicit the optimal osteogenic cell response and promote bone tissue ingrowth inside the pores, as demonstrated in preclinical studies.
Eligibility Criteria
Male and female patients who are 18-80 years of age with planned extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) surgery prior to enrollment in the research at one or two lumbar levels for the treatment of degenerative disc disease, including those with up to Grade 2 spondylolisthesis.
You may qualify if:
- Male and female patients who are 18-80 years of age;
- Planned interbody fusion surgery, including at least one level of extreme lateral interbody fusion (XLIF) prior to enrollment in the research at one or two consecutive lumbar levels for degenerative disc disease, including those with up to Grade 2 spondylolisthesis, with one of the following NuVasive, Inc. interbody implants:
- Coroent® XL PEEK interbody implant; or
- Modulus® 3D-printed titanium interbody implant; or
- Cohere® XLIF Porous PEEKTM interbody implant.
- If a transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion or anterior lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF or ALIF) is planned adjacent to the XLIF level, the same NuVasive, Inc. interbody implant material type must be used as determined by the implant enrollment schedule. For example:
- Smooth PEEK: Coroent XL PEEK (XLIF) + Coroent L (TLIF) or Coroent XLR (ALIF) or Brigade (ALIF)
- D-printed titanium: Modulus XLIF + Modulus TLIF or Modulus ALIF
- Porous PEEK: Cohere XLIF + Coalesce TLIF (currently no ALIF option)
- The planned procedure must include placement of bilateral posterior screw fixation with or without intrafacet fusion using autograft (with or without the assigned allograft used at the XLIF level(s)) at the treated level(s). Direct posterior decompression at the index interbody fusion level(s) is acceptable.
- Preoperative coronal Cobb angle of \< 10°;
- Able to undergo surgery based on physical exam, medical history, and surgeon judgment;
- Understands the conditions of enrollment and willing to sign an informed consent to participate in the evaluation.
You may not qualify if:
- Use of BMP, synthetic bone graft substitutes, allografts, or any other graft material in the interbody or intrafacet spaces other than those under study;
- Posterior grafting other than the allowed intrafacet fusion at the treated level(s);
- Revision of prior fusion at treated level(s) (adjacent level interbody fusion is acceptable);
- XLIF procedure that requires or results in the release of the anterior longitudinal ligament or posterior osteotomy;
- Preoperative coronal Cobb angle of ≥ 10°;
- Procedures performed with XLIF interbody implants with integrated vertebral body screw(s);
- Active smoking six (6) weeks prior to surgery;
- Systemic or local infection (active or latent);
- Diseases that significantly inhibit bone healing (e.g., prior diagnosis of osteoporosis, metabolic bone disease, uncontrolled diabetes, dialysis dependent renal failure, symptomatic liver disease);
- Rheumatoid arthritis or other autoimmune disease that, in the option of the investigator, would interfere with bone healing and/or fusion;
- Treatment with pharmaceuticals interfering with calcium metabolism;
- Undergoing chemotherapy or radiation treatment or chronic use of steroids (defined as more than 6 weeks of steroid use within 12 months of surgery or anytime postoperatively, other than episodic use or inhaled corticosteroids);
- Use of bone stimulators postoperatively;
- Non-ambulatory, wheelchair-bound;
- Involvement in active litigation relating to the spine (worker's compensation claim is allowed if it is not contested);
- +7 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- NuVasivelead
Study Sites (15)
Hartford Healthcare Bone and Joint Institute
Hartford, Connecticut, 06106, United States
Lyerly Neurosurgery
Jacksonville, Florida, 32207, United States
University of South Florida Department of Neurosurgery, Tampa General Hospital
Tampa, Florida, 33606, United States
Rush University Medical Center
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Orthopaedic Institute of Western Kentucky
Paducah, Kentucky, 42001, United States
Suburban Hospital, Johns Hopkins Medicine
Bethesda, Maryland, 20814, United States
University of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55455, United States
Columbia Orthopedic Group Research
Columbia, Missouri, 65201, United States
OrthoCarolina
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28207, United States
Duke University
Durham, North Carolina, 27710, United States
Atlantic Brain and Spine
Wilmington, North Carolina, 28401, United States
The Spine Clinic of OKC
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73114, United States
UT Health San Antonio
San Antonio, Texas, 78229, United States
University of Virginia Health System
Charlottesville, Virginia, 22903, United States
Evergreen Health
Kirkland, Washington, 98034, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Kyle Malone, MS
Globus Medical
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 24, 2018
First Posted
August 28, 2018
Study Start
August 19, 2018
Primary Completion (Estimated)
June 30, 2026
Study Completion (Estimated)
December 31, 2026
Last Updated
December 22, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share