Advancing Understanding of Transportation Options
AUTO
Decision Making Among Older Adults: the AUTO Study
2 other identifiers
interventional
529
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This Stage II randomized, controlled, longitudinal trial seeks to assess the acceptability, feasibility, and effects of a driving decision aid use among geriatric patients and providers. This multi-site trial will (1) test the driving decision aid (DDA) in improving decision making and quality (knowledge, decision conflict, values concordance and behavior intent); and (2) determine its effects on specific subpopulations of older drivers (stratified for cognitive function, decisional capacity, and attitudinally readiness for a mobility transition). The overarching hypotheses are that the DDA will help older adults make high-quality decisions, which will mitigate the negative psychosocial impacts of driving reduction, and that optimal DDA use will target certain populations and settings.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Dec 2019
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 22, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 28, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 12, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 23, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 21, 2023
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 21, 2025
CompletedFebruary 21, 2025
January 1, 2025
3.5 years
October 22, 2019
December 5, 2024
January 31, 2025
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Decisional Conflict Scale (DCS) Scores at Day 0 (Post-intervention)
Decision conflict scale (DCS) is calculated from 16 items, with each item ranging from 0 (strongly agree) to 4 (strongly disagree). The total score is reported on a 0-100 scale by summing all responses, dividing by 16 and multiplying by 25. Higher scores represent greater levels of uncertainty in decision-making (higher decision conflict = worse outcome), and interventions often aim to reduce decision conflict (lower decision conflict = greater likelihood of implementing a decision = better outcome).
Day 0 (Post-intervention)
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Values Clarity Subscale Score at Day 0 (Post-intervention)
Day 0 (Post-intervention)
Older Adult Driving Safety Knowledge Scores as Assessed by True/False Questions at Day 0 (Post-intervention)
Day 0 (Post-intervention)
Decision Self Efficacy Score at Day 0 (Post-intervention)
Day 0 (Post-intervention)
Change in Patient-Reported Outcomes Measurement Information System (PROMIS) 4-item Depression Score
6 months, 12 months, 18 months, 24 months
Change in Ottawa Decision Regret Score
12 months, 18 months, 24 months
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Driving Decision Aid
EXPERIMENTALWeb-based Driving Decision Aid
Older Drivers Website
ACTIVE COMPARATORNational Institute on Aging (NIA) Older Drivers website
Interventions
National Institute on Aging (NIA) Older Drivers Website
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- years or older
- Fluent in English
- At least one medical condition linked in driving cessation
- Drive at least one time per week
- Have a study partner\* (\*drivers interested in participating in the study without a study partner will be placed on a wait list; they may be contacted as a later date for enrollment once 200 driver-study partner dyads have been enrolled across all sites)
- minute MoCA score greater or equal to 21
You may not qualify if:
- In legal custody or institutionalized
- Significant cognitive impairment as measured by 5-minute Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
- Since the last time they had their license renewed, has had at least one major change to health, vision, or hearing that has seriously impaired driving (based on potential participant self-report)
- Feels the Department of Motor Vehicles would have serious concerns about their driving (based on potential participant self-report)
- years or older
- Fluent in English
- Identified by Driver participant to contact for potential participation, i.e., part of a driver-study partner dyad
- minute MoCA score greater or equal to 21
- In legal custody or institutionalized
- Significant cognitive impairment as measured by 5-minute Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Colorado, Denverlead
- National Institute on Aging (NIA)collaborator
Study Sites (3)
University of California, San Diego
La Jolla, California, 92037, United States
CU Anschutz Medical Center
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Indiana University
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Related Publications (3)
Hansmann KJ, Meuser T, Johnson RL, Peterson RA, Fowler NR, DiGuiseppi C, Han D, Moran R, Omeragic F, Betz ME. Internal Factors that Influence Coping in Older Drivers' Transition to Non-Driving. J Appl Gerontol. 2025 Jul;44(7):1172-1180. doi: 10.1177/07334648241298670. Epub 2024 Dec 3.
PMID: 39626218DERIVEDBetz ME, Hill LL, Fowler NR, DiGuiseppi C, Han SD, Johnson RL, Meador L, Omeragic F, Peterson RA, Matlock DD. "Is it time to stop driving?": A randomized clinical trial of an online decision aid for older drivers. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2022 Jul;70(7):1987-1996. doi: 10.1111/jgs.17791. Epub 2022 Apr 20.
PMID: 35441700DERIVEDBetz ME, Omeragic F, Meador L, DiGuiseppi CG, Fowler NR, Han SD, Hill L, Johnson RL, Knoepke CE, Matlock DD, Moran R; AUTO Research Team. The Advancing Understanding of Transportation Options (AUTO) study: design and methods of a multi-center study of decision aid for older drivers. Inj Epidemiol. 2021 May 3;8(1):23. doi: 10.1186/s40621-021-00310-4.
PMID: 33934709DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Marian Betz
- Organization
- University of Colorado
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Marian E Betz, MD, MPH
University of Colorado, Denver
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- HEALTH SERVICES RESEARCH
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 22, 2019
First Posted
October 28, 2019
Study Start
December 12, 2019
Primary Completion
June 23, 2023
Study Completion
December 21, 2023
Last Updated
February 21, 2025
Results First Posted
February 21, 2025
Record last verified: 2025-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share