Study Stopped
The study was closed early due to funding issue
Group-Based Intervention to Improve Mental Health and Adherence Among Youth Living With HIV in Low Resource Settings
IMPAACT 2016 - Evaluating a Group-Based Intervention to Improve Mental Health and Antiretroviral Therapy (ART) Adherence Among Youth Living With HIV in Low Resource Settings
2 other identifiers
interventional
484
4 countries
8
Brief Summary
IMPAACT 2016 was a multi-site, two-arm, individually randomized, controlled study to evaluate whether an Indigenous Leader Outreach Model (ILOM) of trauma-informed cognitive behavioral therapy (TI-CBT) delivered by Indigenous Youth Leaders (IYL) is associated with improved mental health outcomes and ART adherence among youth living with HIV in resource-limited settings. The intervention was adapted to the local context through advance conduct of focus groups and pilot testing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Apr 2024
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 2, 2019
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 18, 2019
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 6, 2024
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 27, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 5, 2025
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 22, 2026
CompletedMay 22, 2026
April 1, 2026
12 months
July 2, 2019
January 12, 2026
May 21, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Group-level Mean General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) at 6 Months
Average (standard deviation) of the group-level mean General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) score within arm. The GAD-7 features 7 items assessing frequency of anxiety symptoms over the past 2 weeks on a scale from 0="Not at all" to 3="Nearly every day". Responses to the 7 items are summed to obtain a GAD-7 score ranging from 0 (least) to 21 (most severe symptoms). A score of 10 or more points indicates moderate to severe anxiety symptoms.
at 6 months
Group-level Mean UCLA Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder-Reaction Index (UCLA-PTSD-RI) at 6 Months
Average (standard deviation) of the group-level mean UCLA Post Traumatic Stress Disorder-Reaction Index (PTSD-RI) score within arm. The UCLA PTSD-RI assesses DSM-IV criteria for PTSD in youth. If prior trauma is endorsed, assessment asks whether 31 PTSD symptoms have occurred within the past month on a scale from 0="None" to 4="Most of the time". A scoring algorithm is applied to the 31 items to calculate a score ranging from 0 (least) to 80 (most severe symptoms). A score of 35 or more indicates moderate to severe PTSD symptoms. If no trauma is endorsed, no score is calculated.
at 6 months
Group-level Mean Composite Mental Health Measure at 6 Months
Average (standard deviation) of the group-level mean Composite score within arm. Composite scores are a study-specific measure of combined mental health symptoms. A participant's PHQ-9, GAD-7, and UCLA PTSD-RI scores at the given timepoint are each standardized according to baseline to get Z scores. The 3 Z scores are summed to obtain a Composite score. Composite scores are not Z scores themselves and can range from -Inf to +Inf, with greater scores reflecting more severe symptoms overall. Composite scores of 0 at baseline represent average symptom levels overall, but otherwise do not have a meaningful central value.
at 6 months
Group-level Mean Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) at 6 Months
Average (standard deviation) of the group-level mean Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score within arm. The PHQ-9 features 9 items assessing the frequency of depression symptoms over the past 2 weeks on a scale from 0="Not at all" to 3="Nearly every day". Responses to the 9 items are summed to obtain a PHQ-9 score ranging from 0 (least) to 27 (most severe symptoms). A score of 10 or more points indicates moderate to severe depression symptoms.
at 6 months
Secondary Outcomes (8)
Group-level Mean General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) at IPL (Immediately Post-Last Group Session)
After initial treatment completion (initial treatment lasted an average of 6 weeks)
Group-level Mean Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) at IPL (Immediately Post Last Group Session)
After initial treatment completion (initial treatment lasted an average of 6 weeks)
Group-level Mean UCLA Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder-Reaction Index (UCLA PTSD-RI) at IPL (Immediately Post-Last Group Session)
After initial treatment completion (initial treatment lasted an average of 6 weeks)
Group-level Mean Composite Mental Health Measure at IPL (Immediately Post-Last Group Session)
After initial treatment completion (initial treatment lasted an average of 6 weeks)
Group-level Mean ART Adherence at 6 Months
at 6 months
- +3 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Youth TI-CBT Intervention Arm
EXPERIMENTALFor youth, the TI-CBT intervention arm consisted of six 2-hour TI-CBT group sessions led by Indigenous Youth Leaders (IYL) during weeks 1 to 8 and one 2-hour booster group session at 6-months. The TI-CBT Intervention was delivered in a group format. The TI-CBT Intervention arm had 15 groups with an average of 8.5 youth per group (range 6-11).
Youth Discussion Control Arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor youth, the Discussion Control arm consisted of six 2-hour discussion group sessions led by IYL during weeks 1 to 8 and one 2-hour booster discussion group session at 6 months. The Discussion Control was delivered in a group format. The Discussion Control arm had 15 groups with an average of 8.4 youth per group (range 5-10).
Caregiver TI-CBT Intervention Arm
EXPERIMENTALFor caregivers, the TI-CBT Intervention arm consisted of two 2-hour TI-CBT group sessions on two separate weeks within 8 weeks of their youth's first group session and one 2-hour booster group session at 6-months led by adult study staff. The TI-CBT Intervention was delivered in group format. The TI-CBT Intervention arm had 15 groups with an average of 7.7 caregivers per group (range 5-10).
Caregivers Discussion Control Arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORFor caregivers, the Discussion Control arm consisted of: two 2-hour discussion group sessions on two separate weeks within 8 weeks of their youth's first group session and one 2-hour booster discussion group session at 6 months led by adult study staff. The Discussion Control intervention was delivered in a group format. The Discussion Control arm had 15 groups with an average of 7.6 caregivers per group (range 3-10).
Interventions
For youth, each TI-CBT group session was led by IYL. TI-CBT teaches techniques and ways to manage distress through psychosocial health education, cognitive restructuring, and "mastery of trauma", which refers to the process by which survivors of psychological trauma work through the traumatic experience in a meaningful way, and are able to move on with life. TI-CBT addresses both the trauma of learning one has HIV and the trauma associated with managing a chronic and stigmatized illness. The intervention highlights links between HIV and traditional gender roles, gender inequities, and gender-based violence. Finally, the relaxation training teaches youth strategies to relax and these are integrated at the beginning and end of each session. TI-CBT Youth Intervention Manuals were distributed to sites for translation, backtranslation, and cultural adaptation in preparation for the Randomized Trial.
For youth, each discussion group session was led by IYL. Discussion topics were selected by youth in the group. Discussion Control sessions took place at a separate time from TI-CBT Intervention sessions to minimize contamination. Youth and caregiver group sessions were also held separately.
For caregivers, each TI-CBT group session was led by adult study staff. TI-CBT teaches techniques and ways to manage distress through psychosocial health education, cognitive restructuring, and "mastery of trauma", which refers to the process by which survivors of psychological trauma work through the traumatic experience in a meaningful way, and are able to move on with life. TI-CBT addresses both the trauma of learning one has HIV and the trauma associated with managing a chronic and stigmatized illness. The intervention highlights links between HIV and traditional gender roles, gender inequities, and gender-based violence. Finally, the relaxation training teaches strategies to relax and these are integrated at the beginning and end of each session. TI-CBT Caregiver Intervention Manuals were distributed to sites for translation, backtranslation, and cultural adaptation in preparation for the Randomized Trial.
For caregivers, each discussion group session was led by adult study staff. Discussion topics were selected by caregivers in the group. Discussion Control sessions took place at a separate time from TI-CBT Intervention sessions to minimize contamination. Youth and caregiver group sessions were also held separately.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- If of legal age to provide independent informed consent as determined by site Standard Operating Procedures (SOPs) and consistent with site IRB/EC policies and procedures: potential youth participant is willing and able to provide written informed consent for study participation.
- If not of legal age to provide independent informed consent: Parent or guardian is willing and able to provide written informed consent for study participation and potential youth participant is willing and able to provide written informed assent for study participation.
- Confirmed HIV-infection based on documented testing of two samples collected at different time points as documented in medical records or by confirmatory testing.
- Age limit 15-19 years
- At screening, aware of his or her HIV infection, as confirmed by Investigator of Record or designee.
- At screening, has been prescribed ART for a minimum of 24 weeks prior to screening based on medical record documentation.
- At screening, meets at least one of the following indicators of moderate to severe mental health symptomology:
- Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) score ≥ 10
- General Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) score ≥ 10
- UCLA Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder-Reaction Index (UCLA PTSD-RI) score \>= 35
- Caregiver, defined as a biological parent, legal guardian, or person who provides emotional, psychological and/or informational care to a youth taking part in the Randomized Trial, as identified by the youth, and for whom the youth has provided written permission to participate in the study.
- Of legal age to provide independent consent and willing and able to provide written informed consent for study participation.
You may not qualify if:
- At entry, participating in a study delivering a mental health or ART adherence intervention.
- Prior participation in an IMPAACT 2016 Focus Group or Pilot Test
- Any other condition, adverse social situation or cognitive impairment that, in the opinion of the site investigator, would preclude informed assent and informed consent, make study participation unsafe, complicate interpretation of study outcome data, or otherwise interfere with achieving the study objectives.
- Prior participation in an IMPAACT 2016 Focus Group or Pilot Test.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trials Grouplead
- National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID)collaborator
- Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD)collaborator
- National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH)collaborator
Study Sites (8)
Gaborone Prevention/Treatment Trials CRS 12701
Gaborone, Botswana
Molepolole Prevention/Treatment Trials CRS 12702
Molepolole, Botswana
College of Medicine CRS 30301
Blantyre, Malawi
University of North Carolina Lilongwe CRS 12001
Lilongwe, Malawi
Soweto IMPAACT CRS 8052
Soweto, South Africa
St. Mary's CRS 30303
Chitungwiza, Zimbabwe
Harare Family Care CRS 31890
Harare, Zimbabwe
Seke North CRS 30306
Harare, Zimbabwe
Related Publications (6)
Dow DE, Libous J, Ponatshego PL, Masheto G, Mvalo T, Payesa C, Buckley J, Stranix-Chibanda L, Nematadzira T, Vhembo T, Ace A, Warshaw M, Townley E, Lee S, Allison S, Donenberg G and the IMPAACT 2016 Team. High levels of mental distress among youth with HIV in Southern Africa: A description of enrollment into IMPAACT 2016, a randomized controlled trial of a peer-led, group-based mental health intervention. Presented at IAS, Kigali, Rwanda, 15 July 2025.
RESULTLibous J, Jeffrey R, George K, Montañez N, Warshaw M, Shakes Raesi M, Ponatshego PL, Maliwichi L, Vhembo T, Mutasa T, Bere CT, Galvin L, Townley E, Varechtchouk O, Dow D, Donenberg G, and the IMPAACT 2016 Team. IMPAACT 2016: The ADAPT-ITT Framework Leveraging Youth and Supporter Voices in the Adaptation of a Trauma-Informed Cognitive Behavioral Therapy Group-Based Intervention for Youth Living with HIV and Mental Health Distress. Presented at Fast Track Cities, Paris, France, 13-15 October 2024.
RESULTVhemo T, Mhembere T, Mbengeranwa T, Bere TC, Mutasa T, Katsande R, Gumbo J, Mudzonga N, Nematadzira T, Maturure SJ, Mandima PF, Maonera S, Stranix-Chibanda L. High Prevalence of Common Mental Health Disorders Amongst Adolescents With HIV in Zimbabwe: IMPAACT 2016; Presented at International Workshop on Pediatrics & HIV, Munich, Germany, 19-20 July 2024.
RESULTLibous JL, Montañez N, Donenberg G, Kapetanovic S, Dow D. IMPAACT 2016: Operationalizing the ADAPT-ITT Model to drive local adaptation of an intervention to improve mental health and medication adherence in youth living with HIV. Presented at Society for Clinical Research Associates 29th Annual Conference, Virtual, 23-26 September 2020.
RESULTWarshaw M, Dow D, Kapetanovic S, Libous J, Reding C, Montañez , Donenberg G. IMPAACT 2016: Interdisciplinary Collaboration at Multiple Levels. Society for Clinical Trials 41st Annual Meeting, Baltimore, MD (Virtual), 2020.
RESULTLibous JL, Montanez NA, Dow DE, Kapetanovic S, Buckley J, Kakhu TJ, Kamthunzi P, Maliwichi LA, Vhembo T, Chawana TD, Nematadzira T, Donenberg GR. IMPAACT 2016: Operationalizing HIV Intervention Adaptations to Inform the Science and Outcomes of Implementation. Front Reprod Health. 2021 May 28;3:662912. doi: 10.3389/frph.2021.662912. eCollection 2021.
PMID: 36303985RESULT
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
1. Due to gender stratification, 12 youth were assigned five to one arm and seven to another. To meet the requirement of six youth per arm, per protocol, the last youth and their caregiver were reassigned to the Discussion arm 2. Due to funding constraints the study was closed early 3. Thirty-seven percent of youth with a Month 6 assessment and twenty-one percent of youth with an IPL assessment did not endorse a trauma, and subsequently did not receive a UCLA PTSD-RI or Composite score.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- IMPAACT Clinicaltrials.gov Coordinator
- Organization
- Family Health International (FHI 360)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Dorothy Dow, MD, MSc
Duke University
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- NETWORK
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 2, 2019
First Posted
July 18, 2019
Study Start
April 6, 2024
Primary Completion
March 27, 2025
Study Completion
June 5, 2025
Last Updated
May 22, 2026
Results First Posted
May 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP
- Time Frame
- Beginning three months following publication and available throughout period of funding of the International Maternal Pediatric Adolescent AIDS Clinical Trial (IMPAACT) Network by NIH.
- Access Criteria
- Data will be shared with researchers who provide a methodologically sound proposal for use of the data that is approved by the IMPAACT Network. Types of Analyses: Specifically for the types of analyses needed to achieve aims in the proposal approved by the IMPAACT Network. Mechanism: Researchers may submit a request for access to data using the IMPAACT "Data Request" form at: https://www.impaactnetwork.org/studies/submit-research-proposal. Researchers of approved proposals will need to sign an IMPAACT Data Use Agreement before receiving the data.
Individual participant data that underlie results in the publication, after deidentification.