A Study to Investigate Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of ASP6294 in the Treatment of Female Subjects With Bladder Pain Syndrome/Interstitial Cystitis
SERENITY
A Phase 2a, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Parallel-group, Proof of Concept Study to Investigate Efficacy, Safety, Pharmacodynamics and Pharmacokinetics of ASP6294 in the Treatment of Female Subjects With Bladder Pain Syndrome/Interstitial Cystitis
2 other identifiers
interventional
119
10 countries
28
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to investigate efficacy, safety and tolerability of ASP6294 in female participants with Bladder Pain Syndrome/Interstitial Cystitis (BPS/IC). This study will also investigate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of ASP6294 in female participants with BPS/IC.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Sep 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_2
28 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 12, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 13, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 28, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 21, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 21, 2019
CompletedOctober 31, 2024
October 1, 2024
1.5 years
September 12, 2017
October 29, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from Baseline in Average Mean Daily Pain (MDP) Score at Week 12
Participants will record their MDP each day in the evening into an e-diary. The MDP is the average pain experienced over the past 24 hours. The average MDP is the mean of daily assessments of MDP in the week prior to the visit with at least 5 recordings in that week. MDP is measured using an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) ranging from 0 (no bladder pain) to 10 (worst imaginable bladder pain). A negative change indicates a reduction/improvement from baseline.
Baseline and Week 12
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Change from Baseline in Average Worst Daily Pain (WDP) Score at Week 12
Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Mean Voiding Frequency per 24 hours at Week 12
Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Mean Number of Level 3 or 4 Urgency Episodes (Based on Patient Perception of Intensity of Urgency Scale [PPIUS]) per 24 hours at Week 12
Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in Bladder Pain/ Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Score (BPIC-SS) Total Score at Week 12
Baseline and Week 12
Change From Baseline in BPIC-SS Worst Bladder Pain (Question 8) Score at Week 12
Baseline and Week 12
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ASP6294
EXPERIMENTALParticipants will receive 320 mg ASP6294 subcutaneous injection at 4-week intervals at baseline (Day 1/Week 0), Week 4 and Week 8.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORParticipants will receive placebo to match 320 mg ASP6294 subcutaneous injection at 4-week intervals at baseline (Day 1/Week 0), Week 4 and Week 8.
Interventions
Participants will receive 320 mg ASP6294 subcutaneous injection at 4-week intervals at baseline (Day 1/Week 0), Week 4 and Week 8.
Participants will receive placebo to match 320 mg ASP6294 subcutaneous injection at 4-week intervals at baseline (Day 1/Week 0), Week 4 and Week 8.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject's signs, symptoms and diagnostic work-up are in accordance with the international society for the study of bladder pain syndrome (ESSIC) definition for bladder pain syndrome/interstitial cystitis (BPS/IC): pelvic pain, pressure or discomfort perceived to be related to the urinary bladder accompanied by at least 1 other urinary symptom such as persistent urge to void or frequency, for at least 6 months in absence of urinary infection or other obvious pathology or identifiable causes. There is documented proof of the diagnosis BPS/IC that has been entered into the subject's records at least 2 months prior to Visit 1/Screening.
- Subject has a score of ≥ 4 and ≤ 9 for pain as assessed by scoring the average pain of the week preceding Visit 1/Screening, using an 11-point NRS (0-10).
- Subject has an estimated voiding frequency of ≥ 8 and ≤ 30 voids per 24 hours.
- Subject has a score of ≥ 7 on the interstitial cystitis symptom index (ICSI) questionnaire.
- Subject must either:
- Be of nonchildbearing potential:
- Postmenopausal (defined as at least 1 year without any menses for which there is no other obvious pathological or physiological cause) prior to screening, or
- Documented surgically sterile (e.g., hysterectomy, bilateral salpingectomy, bilateral oophorectomy)
- Or, if of childbearing potential,
- Agree not to try to become pregnant during the study and for 5 half-lives (i.e., 70 days) after the final study drug administration at Visit 5/Week 8, and
- Have a negative urine pregnancy test at Visit 1/Screening, and
- If heterosexually active, agree to consistently use 1 form of highly effective birth control starting at screening and throughout the study period and for 5 half-lives (i.e., 70 days) after the final study drug administration at Visit 5/Week 8.
- Subject must agree not to breastfeed starting at screening and throughout the study period, and for 5 half-lives (i.e., 70 days) after the final study drug administration at Visit 5/Week 8.
- Subject must agree not to donate ova starting at screening and throughout the study period, and for 5 half-lives (i.e., 70 days) after the final study drug administration at Visit 5/Week 8.
- Subject must be willing and able to comply with study requirements (e.g., complete questionnaires and diaries, able to read and attend all required study visits).
- +5 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Subject has osteoarthritis or has a history of rapidly progressive osteoarthritis.
- Subject has a score of ≥ 30 on the Pain Catastrophizing Scale (PCS).
- Subject has a score of \> 12 on the HADS-D (Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale - Depression subscale).
- Subject has significant pelvic floor pain or spasm which is considered the main cause of the chronic pelvic/bladder pain as concluded by the investigator based on the pelvic floor examination.
- Subject has undergone a fulguration or excision of a Hunner's lesion any time prior to the screening visit.
- Subject has recently undergone or started treatment for BPS/IC as specified below:
- subject has undergone a cystoscopy with hydrodistension or Botox injections in the bladder within 6 months prior to the screening visit.
- subject has received non-pharmacological interventions for BPS/IC (including but not limited to electric stimulation therapy or acupuncture therapy) within 3 months prior to the screening visit.
- subject has received any intravesical pharmacological treatment for BPS/IC (including but not limited to heparin or dimethyl sulfoxide) within 4 weeks prior to the screening visit
- subject had an initiation, discontinuation, or variation in the dose and/or frequency of antimuscarinics, mirabegron, antidepressants (including amitriptyline), anticonvulsants, benzodiazepines, skeletal muscle relaxants, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, non-opioid analgesics, pentosan polysulphate sodium, homeopathic medication and/or herbal therapies during the last 4 weeks prior to the screening visit.
- subject has had changes in non-pharmacological treatment for BPS/IC (e.g., diet or physical therapy) during the last 4 weeks prior to the screening visit.
- Subject has bladder pathology as specified below:
- a post-void residual (PVR) \>200 mL.
- subject has a known currently symptomatic urethral diverticulum.
- subject has a known currently symptomatic bladder or ureteral calculi.
- +25 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (28)
Site BE32001
Leuven, Belgium
Site CZ42002
Pilsen, Czechia
Site DE49003
Duisburg, Germany
Site DE49007
Duisburg, Germany
Site DE49001
Holzminden, Germany
Site DE49005
Markkleeberg, Germany
Site HU36002
Budapest, Hungary
Site HU36001
Csongrád, Hungary
Site LV37103
Daugavpils, Latvia
Site LV37101
Riga, Latvia
Site LV37102
Riga, Latvia
Site LV37105
Riga, Latvia
Site NL31007
Sneek, Netherlands
Site PL48009
Lodz, Poland
Site PL48002
Szczecin, Poland
Site PL48010
Warsaw, Poland
Site PL48007
Wroclaw, Poland
Site RU70001
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Site RU70002
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Site RU70003
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Site RU70006
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Site RU70008
Saint Petersburg, Russia
Site ES34001
Barcelona, Spain
Site ES34008
Madrid, Spain
Site ES34002
Málaga, Spain
Site ES34007
Valencia, Spain
Site GB44002
Manchester, United Kingdom
Site GB44006
Plymouth, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Imamura M, Scott NW, Wallace SA, Ogah JA, Ford AA, Dubos YA, Brazzelli M. Interventions for treating people with symptoms of bladder pain syndrome: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 30;7(7):CD013325. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013325.pub2.
PMID: 32734597DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Project Physician
Astellas Pharma Europe B.V.
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 12, 2017
First Posted
September 13, 2017
Study Start
September 28, 2017
Primary Completion
March 21, 2019
Study Completion
March 21, 2019
Last Updated
October 31, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
- Time Frame
- Access to participant level data is offered to researchers after publication of the primary manuscript (if applicable) and is available as long as Astellas has legal authority to provide the data.
- Access Criteria
- Researchers must submit a proposal to conduct a scientifically relevant analysis of the study data. The research proposal is reviewed by an Independent Research Panel. If the proposal is approved, access to the study data is provided in a secure data sharing environment after receipt of a signed Data Sharing Agreement.
Access to anonymized individual participant level data collected during the study, in addition to study-related supporting documentation, is planned for studies conducted with approved product indications and formulations, as well as products terminated during development. Studies conducted with product indications or formulations that remain active in development are assessed after study completion to determine if Individual Participant Data can be shared. Further details on Astellas' data sharing policy can be found at https://www.clinicaltrials.astellas.com/transparency/.