Efficacy and Safety of AQX-1125 in IC/BPS
LEADERSHIP
A Phase 2 Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of AQX-1125 in Subjects With Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome Mediated by the Src Homology-2-domain-containing Inositol 5' Phosphatase [SHIP1] Pathway
1 other identifier
interventional
69
2 countries
29
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effect of 6 weeks of treatment with once daily administration of AQX-1125 compared to placebo on average daily pain in subjects with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome (IC/BPS), during and after treatment, using a standardized 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) pain score recorded by electronic diary
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Jun 2013
29 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 18, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 20, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2015
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 5, 2017
CompletedSeptember 5, 2017
August 1, 2017
2 years
June 18, 2013
May 5, 2017
August 3, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change From Baseline in the Average Daily Bladder Pain Score (e-Diary)
Change from baseline to week 6 in the average daily bladder pain score using a standardized 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS) recorded by e-diary. The 11-point NRS ranges from 0-10 with 0 indicating 'no pain' and 10 indicating 'worst pain'.
Baseline to Week 6
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Change From Baseline in the Maximum Daily Bladder Pain Score (e-Diary)
Baseline to Week 6
Change From Baseline in the Average Bladder Pain Score (Clinic)
Baseline to Week 6
Change From Baseline in the Maximum Bladder Pain Score (Clinic)
Baseline to Week 6
Bladder Pain/Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Score [BPIC-SS]
Baseline to Week 6
O'Leary-Sant Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Index/Problem Index [ICSI/PI]
Baseline to Week 6
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
AQX-1125 Concentrations in Plasma and Urine (Trough Values)
Week 4 and Week 6
Study Arms (2)
AQX-1125
EXPERIMENTAL1 x AQX-1125 Capsule daily
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATOR1 x placebo capsule daily
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Be females, ≥18 and ≤75 years of age, who have consistently had symptoms of bladder pain in addition to urinary urgency and/or urinary frequency for more than 12 months
- Have had the diagnosis of interstitial cystitis for \> 6 months (pain for at least 12 months) but ≤15 years
- Have average daily pain score of at least 5 out of 10 on the 11-point Numerical Rating Scale \[NRS\] pain scale in the 9 days prior to baseline
- Have undergone a cystoscopy and have documented visible signs of bladder bleeding, lesions or glomerulation within the last 36 months prior to baseline.
- Subjects if of child bearing potential, must agree to avoid pregnancy and use medically acceptable method of contraception from screening visit and throughout the study.
- Must be capable of voiding independently
You may not qualify if:
- Pelvic floor pain (\>5 out of 10 on the 11-point NRS pain scale following a pelvic pain assessment)
- Have a body mass index \[BMI\] of \<18 kg/m2 or \>39 kg/m2
- Have had a urinary tract infection including bacterial cystitis within the past 30 days.
- Have greater than 1+ hematuria on dipstick test at screening from an unknown cause
- History of previous procedure(s) (augmentation cystoplasty, cystectomy, or cystolysis) that has affected bladder function
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (29)
AQX/CMX site
Homewood, Alabama, 35209, United States
AQX/CMX site
Glendora, California, 91741, United States
AQX/CMX site
San Diego, California, 92123, United States
AQX/CMX site
Denver, Colorado, 80211, United States
AQX/CMX site
Farmington, Connecticut, 06032, United States
AQX/CMX site
Orlando, Florida, 32801, United States
AQX/CMX site
Shreveport, Louisiana, 71106, United States
AQX/CMX site
Troy, Michigan, 48084, United States
AQX/CMX site
Garden City, New York, 11530, United States
AQX/CMX Site
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States
AQX/CMX site
Toledo, Ohio, 43615, United States
AQX/CMX site
DeSoto, Texas, 75115, United States
AQX/CMX site
Calgary, Alberta, T2V1P9, Canada
AQX/CMX site
Kelowna, British Columbia, Canada
AQX/CMX Site
Vancouver, British Columbia, V6Z1Y6, Canada
AQX/CMX site
Victoria, British Columbia, Canada
AQX/CMX site
Halifax, Nova Scotia, B3H2Y9, Canada
AQX/CMX site
Barrie, Ontario, Canada
AQX/CMX site
Brampton, Ontario, Canada
AQX/CMX site
Brantford, Ontario, Canada
AQX/CMX site
Burlington, Ontario, Canada
AQX/CMX site
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
AQX/CMX site
Kitchener, Ontario, Canada
AQX/CMX site
Oakville, Ontario, Canada
AQX/CMX site
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Dr Lesley Carr
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
AQX/CMX site
Granby, Quebec, Canada
AQX/CMX site
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
AQX/CMX site
Sherbrooke, Quebec, Canada
Related Publications (1)
Imamura M, Scott NW, Wallace SA, Ogah JA, Ford AA, Dubos YA, Brazzelli M. Interventions for treating people with symptoms of bladder pain syndrome: a network meta-analysis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 30;7(7):CD013325. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013325.pub2.
PMID: 32734597DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- J. Curtis Nickel
- Organization
- Department of Urology, Queens University, Ontario
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Stephen B Shrewsbury, MD
Aquinox Pharmaceuticals (Canada) Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 18, 2013
First Posted
June 20, 2013
Study Start
June 1, 2013
Primary Completion
June 1, 2015
Study Completion
June 1, 2015
Last Updated
September 5, 2017
Results First Posted
September 5, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share