Study Stopped
Prematurely terminated due to data inconsistent with the experimental plan and lack of funding
Engage 24: Evaluation of the Safety and Effectiveness of URG101 in Subjects With Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome
A Phase 2a, Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Multi-Center Single Dose Study to Evaluate the Safety and Effectiveness of URG101 Compared With the Individual Components Lidocaine and Heparin in Subjects With Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
91
1 country
11
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine if the combination product (URG101) is safe and effective versus its individual components (Heparin Sodium and Lidocaine Hydrochloride) for the treatment of Interstitial Cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome. The study is randomized and double-blinded such that neither the subject nor doctor will know which drug or placebo is received.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_2
Started Sep 2015
Typical duration for phase_2
11 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 28, 2015
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 29, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 14, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 18, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 3, 2026
CompletedFebruary 3, 2026
January 1, 2026
2.7 years
October 28, 2015
April 11, 2025
January 15, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Average of Bladder Sum of Pain Intensity Differences From Baseline to 12 Hours (SPID-12) as Determined Using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain Intensity
A calculation of average bladder Sum of Pain Intensity Differences from Baseline to 12 hours (SPID-12). A pain intensity score of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) is obtained before starting the study and throughout the 12 hour time period. The average SPID-12 is calculated by multiplying the Pain Intensity Difference score at each time point by the duration since the preceding time point and then summing these values over the specific time period. A lower, negative average SPID-12 difference is better and indicates a reduction in pain intensity compared to the baseline score, whereas a positive score indicates an increase in pain intensity compared to baseline. The full range of results of the average SPID-12 difference could be -119 to +59.
12 hours
Change of Bladder Sum of Pain Intensity Differences From Baseline to 12 Hours (SPID-12) as Determined Using an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) for Pain Intensity
A calculation of bladder Sum of Pain Intensity Differences from Baseline to 12 hours (SPID-12) after administration of URG101 compared with the SPID-12 after administration of lidocaine alone, heparin alone, and placebo. A pain intensity score of 0 (no pain) to 10 (worst possible pain) is obtained before starting the study and throughout the 12 hour time period. A negative value indicates lower SPID-12 values for URG101. The full range of results of the average SPID-12 difference could be -119 to +59.
12 hours
Study Arms (4)
URG101
EXPERIMENTALA single 15 mL dose of URG101,a mix of buffered Lidocaine (200 mg) and Heparin (50,000 IU), delivered to the bladder via catheter.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORA single 15 mL dose of placebo delivered to the bladder via catheter.
Lidocaine
EXPERIMENTALA single 15 mL dose of buffered Lidocaine (200 mg) delivered to the bladder via catheter.
Heparin
EXPERIMENTALA single 15 mL dose of buffered Heparin (50,000 IU) delivered to the bladder.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects diagnosed with interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome must meet all of the following criteria to participate in the study:
- Have provided written informed consent to participate in this trial
- Be male or female, ≥ 18 years of age
- Have moderate-to-severe symptoms of bladder pain of bladder origin for at least 9 months prior to the study
- May or may not have received a cystoscopy in association with their diagnosis of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome prior to or at time of screening
- Have a score of ≥ 15 and \< 30 on the PUF questionnaire, completed at screening
- A minimum score of 5 is required on the VAS
- Have been using a stable dose of hormone therapy for ≥ 3 months, if female and currently taking hormone therapy
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnant or breastfeeding. For females of child bearing potential and males, if sexually active, must be willing to commit to an acceptable method of birth control for the duration of the study.
- Have a known hypersensitivity to heparin or lidocaine
- Have used any local anesthetic by any route within 24 hours prior to study drug administration, or used a lidocaine patch within 14 days prior to study drug administration
- Have used a tricyclic antidepressant or a gamma-Aminobutyric acid (GABA) analogue (gabapentin or pregabalin) unless taking the medication for ≥ 3 weeks. The stable dose of gabapentin may not exceed 1,200 mg per day, and the stable dose of pregabalin may not exceed 150 mg per day.
- Have used any pain medication within 6 hours prior to study drug administration
- Have used narcotics or medical marijuana ≤ 3 weeks prior to study entry (generic names: fentanyl, hydrocodone, hydromorphone, levorphanol, medical marijuana, methadone, morphine, oxycodone, propoxyphene, tramadol). Subjects who have received codeine within this time period may be admitted if the use is not chronic, and not within 6 hours of enrollment, such that they are not at risk for GI or opiate withdrawal symptoms that in the opinion of the investigator would impact the subject's study participation due to their ability to follow the study protocol or bias study results.
- Have used prohibited drugs as determined by self-report, positive urine drug screen, or in the opinion of the investigator be under the influence of drugs affecting mentation precluding their ability to follow the study protocol or bias study results
- Have a known clinically significant abnormal laboratory test value defined by the investigator
- Have a neurogenic bladder or other disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, may cause neurogenic bladder (including Parkinson's disease, multiple sclerosis, epilepsy, myasthenia gravis, movement disorders, spinal cord damage)
- Have pain or a pain disorder that, in the opinion of the investigator, would make it difficult to discriminate pelvic pain of bladder origin from the other pain
- Have severe depression, bipolar disorder, schizophrenia, anxiety, attention deficit disorder, obsessive compulsive disorder, or other major central nervous system disorder
- Have history of arrhythmias, conduction disturbances, or cardiac disease, or any coexisting medical condition that, in the opinion of the investigator, may be significant or interfere with study procedures or interpretation of study results
- Had bladder instillation therapy within 7 days prior to study entry or had a prior bladder instillation with heparin and lidocaine and did not respond
- Had dilatation (hydrodistention) of bladder within 3 months of study entry
- Evidence or suspected presence of cancer detected during cystoscopy prior to or at time of initial screening.
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Urigenlead
Study Sites (11)
IC Study, LLC
Escondido, California, 92025, United States
University of California San Diego
San Diego, California, 92103, United States
Georgia Urology
Cartersville, Georgia, 30120, United States
The Urogynecology Center
Overland Park, Kansas, 66209, United States
Rutgers Women's Health Clinic
New Brunswick, New Jersey, 08901, United States
The Arthur Smith Institue for Urology- North Shore Long Island Jewish Health System
Lake Success, New York, 11042, United States
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103, United States
MetroHealth System, Center for Advanced Gynecology
Cleveland, Ohio, 44109, United States
Medical University of South Carolina
Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States
Sanford Research
Sioux Falls, South Dakota, 57105, United States
Urology of Virginia, PLLC
Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23462, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The IDMC reported a trend toward significance for URG101; but it was determined that \>300 subjects would be required to reach significance. The data showed inconsistencies between different sites that could affect the ability to pool the data and could not be explained in a blinded analysis. Therefore, at 92 subjects enrolled, the study was terminated early due to data inconsistent with the experimental plan, lack of funding. There is no SAP. Results are limited to primary endpoint and safety.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- CEO
- Organization
- Vaneltix Pharma, Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
C. Lowell Parsons, MD
Urigen
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 28, 2015
First Posted
October 29, 2015
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
May 14, 2018
Study Completion
June 18, 2018
Last Updated
February 3, 2026
Results First Posted
February 3, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share