Study Stopped
Study temporarily suspended awaiting research personnel to resume recruitment
Low-dose Naltrexone for Bladder Pain Syndrome
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Interstitial cystitis/Bladder Pain Syndrome (IC/PBS) is a constellation of symptoms of pelvic discomfort that includes both bladder-related pain as well as urinary frequency, urgency, and nocturia in the absence of an identifiable etiology that affects likely more than 5.4 million patients in the United States. There is a significant overlap in patients with IC/PBS and those with fibromyalgia and chronic pelvic pain syndrome. Low-dose naltrexone (LDN) has been shown to be effective for the treatment of chronic pain conditions. The primary aim of this study is to evaluate if LDN improves pain scores and lower urinary tract symptoms in patients with IC/PBS. A secondary aim is to show that it has a low adverse event profile.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Oct 2020
Typical duration for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
June 24, 2020
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 29, 2020
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 8, 2020
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2024
CompletedDecember 22, 2023
December 1, 2023
3.7 years
June 24, 2020
December 16, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The proportion of subjects in the LDN and placebo groups that are responders with greater than 20% reductions in 7-day average of worst daily Numeric Rating Scale of Pain scores after 8 weeks of treatment.
Will compare pre-intervention to week 8.
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Change in Brief Pain Inventory Score
At pre-intervention to week 8.
Change in average frequency and nocturia during a 5-day voiding diary
At pre-intervention to week 8.
Change in Bladder Pain/Interstitial Cystitis Symptom Score
At pre-intervention to week 8
Change in O'Leary Sant symptom scores
At pre-intervention to week 8
Change in O'Leary Sant Problem Indices scores
At pre-intervention to week 8
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Low-dose naltrexone
ACTIVE COMPARATOR4.5mg of naltrexone to be taken one hour prior to bedtime nightly for 8 weeks.
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo tablet (sugar-pill) to be taken one hour prior to bedtime nightly for 8 weeks.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Men and women with non-Hunner and Hunner lesion disease
- Meeting AUA definition of BPS: An unpleasant sensation (pain, pressure, discomfort) perceived to be related to the urinary bladder associated with lower urinary tract symptoms of greater than 6 weeks duration in the absence of infection or other identifiable cause.
- Stable treatment for 1 month
- day maximum of pain scores at least 4/10 on the numerical rating scale of pain in the bladder/pelvic area. Urinary frequency 8 or higher while awake. Nocturia 2 or higher. BPIC-SS 19.
- Agreement to not take opioids through the duration of the trial
You may not qualify if:
- Substance Use Disorder Diagnosis including Opioid Use Disorder Diagnosis
- Known allergy to naltrexone or naloxone
- Participation in another clinical trial
- Current or planned pregnancy, or breastfeeding
- Chronic pain in another location of the body that is more severe than that related to BPS.
- Any intravesical instillation in last 8 weeks
- If on Elmiron, stable dose for last 3 months
- If on amitriptyline, stable dose for last 3 months
- Any botox within last 6 months
- Treatment for Hunners in the last 6 months
- Any new Interstim settings within last 3 months
- Any new pelvic floor physical therapy in last 12 weeks
- Any change in or new OTC meds over last 2 months.
- Any pain interventions in the preceding 6 weeks (epidural steroid injection, sympathetic block, peripheral nerve block, lumbar medial branch blocks)
- Opioids chronically for IC/BPS in the past unless have been off for 1 year
- +2 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Stanford Health Care
Stanford, California, 94304, United States
Related Publications (1)
Younger J, Parkitny L, McLain D. The use of low-dose naltrexone (LDN) as a novel anti-inflammatory treatment for chronic pain. Clin Rheumatol. 2014 Apr;33(4):451-9. doi: 10.1007/s10067-014-2517-2. Epub 2014 Feb 15.
PMID: 24526250BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Craig V Comiter, MD
Stanford University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Phil Hanno, MD
Stanford University
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jennifer M Hah, MD, MS
Stanford University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Participants will be randomized on a 1:1 ratio to either LDN or placebo. The randomization sequence will be logged by the study coordinator in a REDCap randomization log blinded to other research staff and clinical team and outcome assessors.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
June 24, 2020
First Posted
June 29, 2020
Study Start
October 8, 2020
Primary Completion
July 1, 2024
Study Completion
October 1, 2024
Last Updated
December 22, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Should the study result be positive or promising, we would undertake a larger trial at which point we can reassess the sharing of IPD.