Study Stopped
Insufficient enrollment.
A Study of Nivolumab Plus Brentuximab Vedotin Versus Brentuximab Vedotin Alone in Patients With Advanced Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma, Who Are Relapsed/ Refractory or Who Are Not Eligible for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant,
CheckMate 812
Randomized, Open-label, Phase 3 Trial of Nivolumab Plus Brentuximab Vedotin Versus Brentuximab Vedotin Alone in Participants With Relapsed Refractory or Ineligible for Autologous Stem Cell Transplant (ASCT) Advanced Stage Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma (CheckMate 812: CHECKpoint Pathway and nivoluMAb Clinical Trial Evaluation 812)
2 other identifiers
interventional
23
3 countries
22
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether an investigational immuno-therapy combination, nivolumab with Brentuximab vedotin compared to Brentuximab vedotin alone is safe and effective in the treatment of relapsed and refractory Classical Hodgkin Lymphoma. The participants of this trial will comprise of patients who have relapsed or did not respond to treatment and are not eligible for stem cell transplant
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3
Started Jun 2017
Typical duration for phase_3
22 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 3, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 26, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 22, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 22, 2021
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 12, 2022
CompletedJanuary 10, 2024
January 1, 2024
3.7 years
May 1, 2017
February 11, 2022
January 8, 2024
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Progression Free Survival (PFS)
Progression Free Survival (PFS) is defined as time from date of randomization to death, or disease progression per investigator assessment estimated using the Kaplan-Meier (KM) product-limit method.
From randomization to date of death, or disease progression (up to approximately 45 months)
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Complete Response Rate (CRR):
From randomization up to approximately 45 months
Objective Response Rate (ORR)
From randomization up to approximately 45 months
Duration of Response (DOR)
From randomization to date of documented progression or death (up to approximately 45 months)
Duration of Complete Response (DOCR)
From randomization to date of documented progression or death (up to approximately 45 months)
Overall Survival (OS)
From randomization to the date of death (up to approximately 3 years 7 months)
Study Arms (2)
Module A
EXPERIMENTALNivolumab combined with Brentuximab
Module B
EXPERIMENTALBrentuximab alone
Interventions
Specified dose on specified days
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) performance status (PS) 0 or 1.
- Participants must have a pathologic diagnosis of classical Hodgkin lymphoma (cHL) who are relapsed or refractory with one of the following:.
- i) Autologous stem cell transplant (ASCT) ineligible patients.
- ii) Patients after failure of ASCT.
- \- Must have at least one lesion that is \> 15 mm (1.5 cm) in the longest diameter and avid by Fluoro Deoxy Glucose (FDG) Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scan.
You may not qualify if:
- Known central nervous system lymphoma.
- Participants with nodular lymphocyte-predominant Hodgkin lymphoma (HL).
- Participants with known history of pancreatitis or progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy (PML).
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bristol-Myers Squibblead
- Seagen Inc.collaborator
- Ono Pharmaceutical Co. Ltdcollaborator
Study Sites (22)
City of Hope National Medical Center
Duarte, California, 91010, United States
Pacific Shores Medical Group
Long Beach, California, 90813, United States
University of Southern California
Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States
UCLA Clinical and Translational Research Center (CTRC)
Los Angeles, California, 90095-1678, United States
Local Institution
Palo Alto, California, 94304, United States
UC Davis Comprehensive Cancer Center
Sacramento, California, 95817, United States
University of California San Diego
San Diego, California, 92122, United States
Hartford Healthcare Cancer Institute at the Hospital of Central Connecticut
Plainville, Connecticut, 06062, United States
Orlando Health, Inc
Orlando, Florida, 32806, United States
Parkview Cancer Center
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46845, United States
University of Kansas Cancer Center
Westwood, Kansas, 66205, United States
Tulane University Health Sciences Center
New Orleans, Louisiana, 70112, United States
Dana Farber/Harvard Cancer Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
Karmanos Cancer Institute
Detroit, Michigan, 48201, United States
Wake Forest University Health Sciences
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157, United States
University of Pennsylvania
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
Bon Secours Saint Francis Cancer Center
Greenville, South Carolina, 29607, United States
Vanderbilt Ingram Cancer Center
Nashville, Tennessee, 37213, United States
University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center
Dallas, Texas, 75390, United States
The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center-merge
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Local Institution
Sendai, Miyagi, 9808574, Japan
Local Institution
San Juan, 00918, Puerto Rico
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Due to a treatment paradigm shift and subsequent low enrollment, the Sponsor chose to terminate the study and consequently there is limited data. These reasons were unrelated to any adverse events (AEs) or safety concerns. The sample size was smaller than expected, therefore, results should be interpreted with caution. PFS, CRR, and ORR outcomes should be interpreted with caution given large confidence intervals around medians and early study closure.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Bristol-Myers Squibb Study Director
- Organization
- Bristol-Myers Squibb
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Bristol-Myers Squibb
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 1, 2017
First Posted
May 3, 2017
Study Start
June 26, 2017
Primary Completion
February 22, 2021
Study Completion
February 22, 2021
Last Updated
January 10, 2024
Results First Posted
April 12, 2022
Record last verified: 2024-01