Lithium Versus Quetiapine in Treatment Resistant Depression
LQD
A Randomised Pragmatic Trial Comparing the Clinical and Cost Effectiveness of Lithium and Quetiapine Augmentation in Treatment Resistant Depression
1 other identifier
interventional
276
1 country
1
Brief Summary
LQD is a multicentre randomised clinical trial comparing the clinical and cost effectiveness of lithium versus quetiapine when used as add-on therapies to antidepressant medication for patients with treatment resistant depression. The Lithium versus Quetiapine in Depression (LQD) study will assess patients over 12 months to establish which (if any) treatment is more likely to improve TRD over a long duration of time. Professor Anthony Cleare is the Chief Investigator and recruitment began in November 2016.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Nov 2016
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 17, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 29, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2021
CompletedMarch 5, 2021
March 1, 2021
4.4 years
November 17, 2016
March 3, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Longitudinal depressive symptom severity
QIDS-SR
52 weeks
Difference in time to all-cause treatment discontinuation
The difference in the time at which patients stop taking the medication for any reason between the two treatment arms.
12 months
Secondary Outcomes (14)
Change in clinician rated depression severity
From baseline to weeks 8 and 52
Response rates
8 weeks and 52 weeks
Remission rates
8 and 52 weeks
Health related quality of life
Measured at 8 and 52 weeks
Social functioning
Measured at baseline, 8 and 52 weeks
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (27)
Change in global severity
Measured at 8, 26 and 52 weeks
Global efficacy
Measured at 8, 26 and 52 weeks
Side effects
Measured at 8 and 52 weeks
- +24 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Lithium
ACTIVE COMPARATORLithium will be prescribed to patients in this arm as an augmenter on top of a patient's existing antidepressant treatment.
Quetiapine
EXPERIMENTALQuetiapine will be prescribed to patients in this arm as an augmenter on top of a patient's existing antidepressant treatment.
Interventions
Quetipatine prescribed in addition to the patient's existing antidepressant treatment.
Lithium prescribed in addition to the patient's existing antidepressant treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Under the care of a GP and/or adult mental health services
- Current episode of depression meeting DSM-5 criteria for major depressive disorder (MDD) - single or recurrent episode 3.17-item HAM-D score ≥ 14 - this cut-off reflects a pragmatic minimum severity of depression as also chosen in comparable studies such as STAR\*D (Rush et al 2006, Trivedi et al 2006)
- Any gender and aged 18 years or over 5.Meet criteria for treatment resistant depression (Fekadu et al., 2009a; Cleare et al., 2015): current episode has not responded to at least two antidepressants given for at least 6 weeks at minimum therapeutic dose defined as fluoxetine ≥20mg/day, paroxetine ≥20mg/day, sertraline ≥50mg/day, citalopram ≥20mg/day, escitalopram ≥10mg/day, venlafaxine ≥75mg/day, duloxetine ≥60 mg/day, mirtazapine ≥15mg/day, tricyclic antidepressant ≥125mg/day, and dosage as guided by the national Maudsley Prescribing Guidelines or BNF for any other antidepressant. Please note, relapse whilst on an antidepressant also counts as a failed treatment trial 6.Current antidepressant treatment has remained unchanged and at, or above, a therapeutic dose for ≥6 weeks 7.Provision of written, informed consent.
You may not qualify if:
- Diagnosis of bipolar disorder (defined as meeting DSM-5 criteria for bipolar 1 or bipolar 2) on the MINI 7.0 (as recommended treatments are different for bipolar depression)
- Diagnosis of current psychosis (as recommended treatments are different for current psychosis - antidepressants plus antipsychotics is the first-line treatment recommendation (NiCE, 2009; Cleare et al., 2015)
- Adequate use of lithium or quetiapine during the current episode. An adequate dose of lithium is defined as the patient taking lithium for at least 4 weeks at an adequate dose (leading to a documented plasma concentration of \>0.4mmol/L) and for quetiapine, prescription in the range of 150-300mg/d for 4 weeks or longer. Or, if the patient has taken an inadequate dose of lithium or quetiapine in the current episode, the patient and clinician are not willing to re-prescribe/take the medication.
- Ongoing use of another atypical antipsychotic (discontinuation will be required before study entry i.e. any time prior to randomisation)
- Known contraindication to use of either lithium or quetiapine: known hypersensitivity of lithium or quetiapine or any of their excipients; severe renal insufficiency / impairment; untreated hypothyroidism; severe cardiac disease / insufficiency; low sodium levels e.g. dehydrated patients or those on low sodium diets; Addison's disease; Brugada syndrome or family history of Brugada syndrome; the rare hereditary inborn errors of metabolism galactosaemia, the Lapp lactase deficiency or glucose-galactose malabsorption; concomitant administration of cytochrome P450 3A4 inhibitors; or congenital QT prolongation.
- We will not recruit any individual who is currently participating in a clinical trial of an investigational medical product (CTIMP).
- Insufficient degree of comprehension or attention to be able to engage in trial procedures.
- We will exclude women who are pregnant, actively trying for pregnancy, or currently breastfeeding. This will be based on verbal report of the subject. Otherwise the management will be as appropriate according to standard clinical practice within the context of a pragmatic, open trial, for example adequate contraceptive precautions decided on the clinical judgement of the prescriber.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- King's College Londonlead
- University of Oxfordcollaborator
- Newcastle Universitycollaborator
- Oxford Health NHS Foundation Trustcollaborator
- Northumberland, Tyne and Wear NHS Foundation Trustcollaborator
- South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trustcollaborator
- Tees, Esk and Wear Valleys NHS Foundation Trustcollaborator
- Sussex Partnership NHS Foundation Trustcollaborator
- Avon and Wiltshire Mental Health Partnership NHS Trustcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology and Neuroscience, King's College London
London, SE5 8AF, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Marwood L, Taylor R, Goldsmith K, Romeo R, Holland R, Pickles A, Hutchinson J, Dietch D, Cipriani A, Nair R, Attenburrow MJ, Young AH, Geddes J, McAllister-Williams RH, Cleare AJ. Study protocol for a randomised pragmatic trial comparing the clinical and cost effectiveness of lithium and quetiapine augmentation in treatment resistant depression (the LQD study). BMC Psychiatry. 2017 Jun 26;17(1):231. doi: 10.1186/s12888-017-1393-0.
PMID: 28651526DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Anothony Cleare
Professor of Psychiatry
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 17, 2016
First Posted
December 29, 2016
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion
April 1, 2021
Study Completion
August 1, 2021
Last Updated
March 5, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
The decision to share IPD to other researchers will be made by the CI on a case by case basis.