A Long-term Safety Study of Esketamine Nasal Spray in Treatment-resistant Depression
SUSTAIN-3
An Open-label Long-term Extension Safety Study of Esketamine Nasal Spray in Treatment-resistant Depression
3 other identifiers
interventional
1,148
24 countries
170
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess the safety and tolerability of esketamine nasal spray in participants with treatment-resistant depression (TRD).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3
Started Jun 2016
Longer than P75 for phase_3
170 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 29, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 25, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 9, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 20, 2024
CompletedApril 29, 2025
April 1, 2025
6.6 years
April 29, 2016
December 29, 2023
April 25, 2025
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (12)
Change From Study Baseline in Computerized Cognitive Battery Domain Score: Detection Test (DET) Score
This battery is a series of computerized cognition tests (detection, identification, one card learning, one back and groton maze learning) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and memory, and executive function/sequencing. The DET is a measure of psychomotor function and uses a well-validated simple reaction time. In this outcome measure, speed of performance of subjects (calculated as mean of the logarithmic base 10 transformed reaction times) for correct responses was reported. Total score ranged from 2 to 3.3 log 10 milliseconds (msec). Lower score indicated better performance. Higher change from baseline indicated better performance.
IND Phase: Baseline up to 4 weeks; OP/MA Phase: Baseline up to 78 months
Change From Study Baseline in Computerized Cognitive Battery Domain Score: Identification Test (IDN) Score
This battery is a series of computerized cognition tests (detection, identification, one card learning, one back and groton maze learning) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and memory, and executive function/sequencing. IDN test is a measure of visual attention (choice reaction time) and scored for speed of response (mean of the log10 transformed reaction times for correct responses). Total score ranged from 2 to 3.3 log 10 msec. Lower score indicated better performance. Higher change from baseline indicated better performance.
IND Phase: Baseline up to 4 weeks; OP/MA Phase: Baseline up to 78 months
Change From Study Baseline in Computerized Cognitive Battery Domain Score: One Card Learning Test (OCL) Score
This battery is a series of computerized cognition tests (detection, identification, one card learning, one back and groton maze learning) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and memory, and executive function/sequencing. OCL test is a measure of visual episodic memory and visual recall test scored using arcsine transformation of the percentage of correct responses (CR). The range for OCL is 0 to 100 percent (%) accuracy; presented as an arcsin transformation, the range is 0 to 1.57. Higher score indicated better performance. Higher change from baseline indicated better performance.
IND Phase: Baseline up to 4 weeks; OP/MA Phase: Baseline up to 78 months
Change From Study Baseline in Computerized Cognitive Battery Domain Score: One Back Test (ONB) Score
The ONB is a measure of working memory and scored for speed of correct response (mean of the log10-transformed reaction times for correct responses). Total score ranged from 2 to 3.54 log10 msec. Lower score indicated better performance. Higher change from baseline indicated better performance.
IND Phase: Baseline up to 4 weeks; OP/MA Phase: Baseline up to 78 months
Change From Study Baseline in Computerized Cognitive Battery Domain Score: Groton Maze Learning Test (GMLT) Score
This battery is a series of computerized cognition tests (detection, identification, one card learning, one back and groton maze learning) designed to measure reaction time, visual learning and memory, and executive function/sequencing. GMLT measures executive function; maze/sequencing test, scored for total number of errors. Total score ranged from 0 to 999 number of errors. Lower score indicated better performance. Higher change from baseline indicated better performance.
IND Phase: Baseline up to 4 weeks; OP/MA Phase: Baseline up to 78 months
Change From Study Baseline in Hopkins Verbal Learning Test-Revised (HVLT-R) Score
The HVLT-R measures performance in verbal memory, learning, and long-term recall in which a list of words is read up to three times. Approximately 20-25 minutes later, a delayed recall trial and a recognition trial are completed. The delayed recall requires free recall of any words remembered. The recognition trial is composed of 24 words, including the 12 target words and 12 false-positives. When scoring the HVLT, the three learning trials are combined to calculate a total recall score (0-36); the delayed recall trial creates the delayed recall score (0-12); the total number of true-positive errors (0-12); and the range of recognition discrimination index is comprised by subtracting the total number of false positives from the total number of true positives. A higher total recall score indicated higher cognition. The range of the recognition discrimination index is -12 to 12. Higher score indicated better performance and higher change from baseline indicated better performance.
IND Phase: Baseline up to 4 weeks; OP/MA Phase: Baseline up to 78 months
Percentage of Participants Based on Columbia-Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) Score
C-SSRS: interview-based instrument to systematically assess suicidal ideation (SI) and behavior, to assess whether participant experienced any of following: completed suicide, suicide attempt (response of "yes" on "actual attempt"), preparatory acts toward imminent suicidal behavior ("yes" on "preparatory acts or behavior", "aborted attempt" or "interrupted attempt"), suicidal ideation ("yes" on "wish to be dead", "non-specific active suicidal thoughts", "active SI with methods without intent to act or some intent to act, without or with specific plan and intent), any self-injurious behavior with no suicidal intent ("yes" on "has participant engaged in non-suicidal self-injurious behavior"). Here, percentage of participants with \>=1 positive behavior, participants with \>=1 positive ideations; no event were reported.
IND Phase: Baseline up to 4 weeks; OP/MA Phase: Baseline up to 78 months
Number of Participants With Treatment-emergent Adverse Events (TEAEs)
An adverse event (AE) was any untoward medical occurrence in a clinical study participant administered a pharmaceutical (investigational or non-investigational) product. An AE does not necessarily have a causal relationship with the intervention. Any AE occurring at or after the initial administration of study intervention up to end of study was considered as treatment-emergent.
IND Phase: up to 4 weeks; OP/MA Phase: up to 78 months
Change From Baseline in Heart Rate
Change from baseline (predose) in heart rate were reported.
IND Phase: Baseline up to 4 weeks; OP/MA Phase: Baseline up to 78 months
Change From Baseline in Systolic and Diastolic Blood Pressure
Change from baseline in systolic and diastolic blood pressure were reported.
IND Phase: Baseline up to 4 weeks; OP/MA Phase: Baseline up to 78 months
Change From Baseline in Respiratory Rate
Change from baseline in respiratory rate were reported.
IND Phase: Baseline up to 4 weeks; OP/MA Phase: Baseline up to 78 months
Change From Baseline in Blood Oxygen Saturation
Change from baseline in blood oxygen saturation (predose) were reported.
IND Phase: Baseline up to 4 weeks; OP/MA Phase: Baseline up to 78 months
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Change From Baseline in Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS) Total Score
IND Phase: Baseline up to 4 weeks; OP/MA Phase: Baseline up to 78 months
Change From Baseline in Participant-Reported Depressive Symptoms Using the Patient Health Questionnaire - 9 (PHQ-9) Total Score
IND Phase: Baseline up to 4 weeks; OP/MA Phase: Baseline up to 78 months
Change From Baseline in Clinical Global Impression-severity (CGI-S) Score
IND Phase: Baseline up to 4 weeks; OP/MA Phase: Baseline up to 78 months
Change From Baseline in Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS) Total Score
IND Phase: Baseline up to 4 weeks; OP/MA Phase: Baseline up to 78 months
Change From Baseline in Participant-Reported Health-related Quality of Life as Assessed by EuroQol-5 Dimension-5 Level (EQ-5D-5L) Valuation Index Score (VAS)
IND Phase: Baseline up to 4 weeks; OP/MA Phase: Baseline up to 78 months
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Esketamine Nasal Spray
EXPERIMENTALOpen-Label Induction Phase: Participants will self-administer with esketamine nasal spray twice per week for 4 weeks as a flexible dose regimen (56 milligram \[mg\] or 84 mg for those \< 65 years; 28 mg, 56 mg or 84 mg for those \>= 65 years). Participants \>= 65 years old will start at a dose of 28 mg on Day 1. Optimization/Maintenance Phase: Participants entering from studies ESKETINTRD3001 (NCT02417064), ESKETINTRD3002 (NCT02418585), ESKETINTRD3003 (NCT02493868), ESKETINTRD3004 (NCT02497287), or ESKETINTRD3006 (US sites only) will self-administer esketamine nasal spray (same dose) once weekly. Participants entering from study ESKETINTRD3005 (NCT02422186) will self-administer esketamine nasal spray (28 mg in week 1; 28 or 56 mg in week 2; and 28, 56 or 84 mg in week 3 and 4) once weekly. After Week 4 (starting at Week 5), based on the Investigator's clinical judgment, the dose of esketamine for all participants can be adjusted based upon efficacy and tolerability.
Interventions
Open-Label Induction Phase: Participants will self-administer with esketamine nasal spray twice per week for 4 weeks as a flexible dose regimen (56 milligram \[mg\] or 84 mg for those \< 65 years; 28 mg, 56 mg or 84 mg for those \>= 65 years). Participants \>= 65 years old will start at a dose of 28 mg on Day 1. Optimization/Maintenance Phase: Participants entering from studies ESKETINTRD3001 (NCT02417064), ESKETINTRD3002 (NCT02418585) or ESKETINTRD3006 (US sites only) will self-administer esketamine nasal spray (same dose) once weekly. Participants entering from study ESKETINTRD3005 (NCT02422186) will self-administer esketamine nasal spray (28 mg in week 1; 28 or 56 mg in week 2; and 28, 56 or 84 mg in week 3 and 4) once weekly. After Week 4 (starting at Week 5), based on the Investigator's clinical judgment, the dose of esketamine for all participants can be adjusted based upon efficacy and tolerability.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Based on the prior study the participant is entering 54135419TRD3008 from: a) From ESKETINTRD3001 (NCT02417064) or ESKETINTRD3002 (NCT02418585) study: Participant has completed the induction phase and the 2-weeks follow up phase visit; or Participants completed the induction phase and was a responder and study ESKETINTRD3003 is terminated.; b) From ESKETINTRD3003 (NCT02493868) study: (1) Participant relapsed during the maintenance phase; or (2) Participant was in the induction phase of the ESKETINTRD3003 study when the study was terminated and, after completion of the induction phase, was determined to be a responder; or (3) Participant was in the optimization or maintenance phases at the time the study was terminated; or (4) or (5) Participants was in the induction phase and after completion of induction phase was determined to not meet response criteria (1) Participant completed ESKETINTRD3004 study (optimization/maintenance phase); or (2) Participant was in the induction phase of the ESKETINTRD3004 study when the study was terminated and, after completion of the induction phase, was determined to be a responder; or (3) Participant was in the optimization/maintenance phase at the time the study was terminated; (4) Participant was in the induction phase and did not meet criteria for response may be eligible for to be rolled over into 54135419TRD3008. d) From ESKETINTRD3005 (NCT02422186) study: Participant was in the induction phase of the ESKETINTRD3005 study at the time enrollment into the ESKETINTRD3004 study was closed and, after completion of the induction phase, was determined to be a responder or did not meet the criteria for response. e) From ESKETINTRD3006 study (US Study sites only) (1) Participant completed the induction phase and was a responder.
You may not qualify if:
- Participant must be medically stable according to the investigator's judgment and knowledge of the subject's medical stability in the parent study. This determination must be documented.
- A woman of childbearing potential must have a negative serum (beta-human chorionic gonadotropin \[b-hCG\]) predose on the day of the first intranasal treatment session
- During the study (that is, from the first intranasal treatment session) and for a minimum of 1 spermatogenesis cycle (defined as approximately 90 days) after receiving the last dose of intranasal study medication, a man who is sexually active with a woman of childbearing potential must be practicing a highly effective method of contraception with his female partner c) must agree not to donate sperm.
- The evaluation of the benefit versus risk of continued esketamine nasal spray treatment is not favorable for the participant in the opinion of the investigator
- Since the last study visit in the participant's prior study, participant has suicidal ideation with intent to act per the investigator's clinical judgment or based on the Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS) \[corresponding to a response of "Yes" on Item 4 (active suicidal ideation with some intent to act, without specific plan) or Item 5 (active suicidal ideation with specific plan and intent) in the suicidal ideation module of the C-SSRS\] or suicidal behavior per the investigator's clinical judgment or based on the C-SSRS (corresponding to any score higher than 0 in the suicidal behavior module of the C-SSRS)
- Participant has positive test result(s) for drugs of abuse (including barbiturates, methadone, opiates, cocaine, phencyclidine, and amphetamine/methamphetamine) predose on the day of the first intranasal treatment session
- Participant has any anatomical or medical condition that, per the investigator's clinical judgment based on assessment, may impede delivery or absorption of intranasal study drug
- Participant has taken any prohibited therapies that would not permit administration of the first intranasal treatment session
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (173)
Unknown Facility
Birmingham, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Garden Grove, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Glendale, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Oakland, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Orange, California, United States
Unknown Facility
San Diego, California, United States
Unknown Facility
San Rafael, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Hartford, Connecticut, United States
Unknown Facility
New Haven, Connecticut, United States
Unknown Facility
Gainesville, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Orlando, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Hoffman Estates, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Joliet, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Maywood, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Skokie, Illinois, United States
Unknown Facility
Iowa City, Iowa, United States
Unknown Facility
Wichita, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Lake Charles, Louisiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Shreveport, Louisiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Baltimore, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Gaithersburg, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Boston, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
New Bedford, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
Watertown, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
Rochester Hills, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
O'Fallon, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Saint Charles, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Omaha, Nebraska, United States
Unknown Facility
Cedarhurst, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
New York, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Staten Island, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Hickory, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Allentown, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Media, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Lincoln, Rhode Island, United States
Unknown Facility
Providence, Rhode Island, United States
Unknown Facility
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Austin, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Dallas, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Wichita Falls, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlottesville, Virginia, United States
Unknown Facility
Waukesha, Wisconsin, United States
Unknown Facility
Banfield, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Córdoba, Argentina
Unknown Facility
La Plata, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Mendoza, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Rosario, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Caulfield, Australia
Unknown Facility
Elizabeth Vale, Australia
Unknown Facility
Frankston, Australia
Unknown Facility
Vienna, Austria
Unknown Facility
Aalst, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Bruges, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Brussels, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Heusden-Zolder, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Liège, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Yvoir, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Belo Horizonte, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Curitiba, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Fortaleza, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Passo Fundo, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Porto Alegre, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Recife, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Rio de Janeiro, Brazil
Unknown Facility
São Bernardo do Campo, Brazil
Unknown Facility
São Paulo, Brazil
Unknown Facility
Burgas, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Kardzhali, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Pazardzhik, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Pleven, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Plovdiv, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Rousse, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Sofia, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Varna, Bulgaria
Unknown Facility
Vancouver, British Columbia, Canada
Unknown Facility
Kingston, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Ottawa, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Unknown Facility
Brno, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Pilsen, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Prague, Czechia
Unknown Facility
Tallinn, Estonia
Unknown Facility
Tartu, Estonia
Unknown Facility
Kuopio, Finland
Unknown Facility
Clermont-Ferrand, France
Unknown Facility
Douai, France
Unknown Facility
Nantes, France
Unknown Facility
Nîmes, France
Unknown Facility
Paris, France
Unknown Facility
Poitiers, France
Unknown Facility
Toulon, France
Unknown Facility
Berlin, Germany
Unknown Facility
Bochum, Germany
Unknown Facility
Mainz, Germany
Unknown Facility
Mittweida, Germany
Unknown Facility
Oranienburg, Germany
Unknown Facility
Pfaffenhofen, Germany
Unknown Facility
Budapest, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Debrecen, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Győr, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Pécs, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Sopron, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Szekszárd, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Vác, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Kaunas, Lithuania
Unknown Facility
Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia
Unknown Facility
Guadalajara, Mexico
Unknown Facility
León, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Mexico City, Mexico
Unknown Facility
México, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Monterrey, Mexico
Unknown Facility
San Luis Potosí City, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Bełchatów, Poland
Unknown Facility
Bialystok, Poland
Unknown Facility
Bydgoszcz, Poland
Unknown Facility
Gdansk, Poland
Unknown Facility
Leszno, Poland
Unknown Facility
Lublin, Poland
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, Poland
Unknown Facility
Bratislava, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Liptovský Mikuláš, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Rimavská Sobota, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Rožňava, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Svidník, Slovakia
Unknown Facility
Cape Town, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Pretoria, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Welgemoed, South Africa
Unknown Facility
Gwangju, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Seoul, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Alcorcón, Spain
Unknown Facility
Barcelona, Spain
Unknown Facility
Bilbao, Spain
Unknown Facility
Madrid, Spain
Unknown Facility
Oviedo, Spain
Unknown Facility
Palma, Spain
Unknown Facility
Pamplona, Spain
Unknown Facility
Sabadell, Spain
Unknown Facility
Salamanca, Spain
Unknown Facility
Sant Boi de Llobregat, Spain
Unknown Facility
Torrevieja, Spain
Unknown Facility
Vitoria-Gasteiz, Spain
Unknown Facility
Zamora, Spain
Unknown Facility
Halmstad, Sweden
Unknown Facility
Lund, Sweden
Unknown Facility
Skövde, Sweden
Unknown Facility
Stockholm, Sweden
Unknown Facility
Kaohsiung City, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
New Taipei City, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Taichung, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Taipei, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Taoyuan District, Taiwan
Unknown Facility
Adana, Turkey (Türkiye)
Unknown Facility
Ankara, Turkey (Türkiye)
Unknown Facility
Bursa, Turkey (Türkiye)
Unknown Facility
Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Unknown Facility
Kucukcekmece/Istanbul, Turkey (Türkiye)
Unknown Facility
Oanakkale, Turkey (Türkiye)
Unknown Facility
Samsun, Turkey (Türkiye)
Unknown Facility
Chesterfield, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Derby, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
London, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Northampton, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Oxford, United Kingdom
Related Publications (4)
Zaki N, Chen LN, Lane R, Doherty T, Drevets WC, Morrison RL, Sanacora G, Wilkinson ST, Young AH, Lacerda ALT, Paik JW, Popova V, Fu DJ. Safety and efficacy with esketamine in treatment-resistant depression: long-term extension study. Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2025 Jun 6;28(6):pyaf027. doi: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaf027.
PMID: 40319349DERIVEDCastro M, Wilkinson ST, Al Jurdi RK, Petrillo MP, Zaki N, Borentain S, Fu DJ, Turkoz I, Sun L, Brown B, Cabrera P. Efficacy and Safety of Esketamine Nasal Spray in Patients with Treatment-Resistant Depression Who Completed a Second Induction Period: Analysis of the Ongoing SUSTAIN-3 Study. CNS Drugs. 2023 Aug;37(8):715-723. doi: 10.1007/s40263-023-01026-3. Epub 2023 Aug 9.
PMID: 37558912DERIVEDZaki N, Chen LN, Lane R, Doherty T, Drevets WC, Morrison RL, Sanacora G, Wilkinson ST, Popova V, Fu DJ. Long-term safety and maintenance of response with esketamine nasal spray in participants with treatment-resistant depression: interim results of the SUSTAIN-3 study. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2023 Jul;48(8):1225-1233. doi: 10.1038/s41386-023-01577-5. Epub 2023 May 12.
PMID: 37173512DERIVEDStarr HL, Abell J, Larish A, Lewis S, DeMuro C, Gogate J, Jamieson C, Daly E, Zaki N, Kramer M. Self-reported review of the value of esketamine in patients with treatment-resistant depression: Understanding the patient experience in the STRIVE Study. Psychiatry Res. 2020 Nov;293:113376. doi: 10.1016/j.psychres.2020.113376. Epub 2020 Aug 8.
PMID: 32818917DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Global Medical Head
- Organization
- Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Janssen Research & Development, LLC Clinical Trial
Janssen Research & Development, LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 29, 2016
First Posted
May 25, 2016
Study Start
June 9, 2016
Primary Completion
December 30, 2022
Study Completion
December 30, 2022
Last Updated
April 29, 2025
Results First Posted
February 20, 2024
Record last verified: 2025-04