Contingency Management for Meth in South Africa Methamphetamine Abuse in South Africa
Combating Craving With Contingency Management: Neuroplasticity and Methamphetamine Abuse in South Africa
1 other identifier
interventional
28
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will link findings from neuroscience with clinical outcomes using contingency management (CM) to identify changes in brain structure and function that emerge during purely behavioral therapy for methamphetamine (MA) use.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2015
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 13, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 20, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 15, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 15, 2018
CompletedMay 10, 2019
May 1, 2019
2.5 years
September 13, 2016
May 8, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Responses to Contingency Management
urine samples documenting methamphetamine abstinence
8 weeks
fMRI Measures
measures of resting state connectivity
Change b/w baseline and 8 Weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Stop Signal Task
Change b/w baseline and 8 Weeks
Continuous Performance Task
Change b/w baseline and 8 Weeks
Stroop
Change b/w baseline and 8 Weeks
Balloon Analog Risk Task
Change b/w baseline and 8 Weeks
Study Arms (1)
Contingency Management
EXPERIMENTALIn exchange for consecutive urine samples documenting methamphetamine abstinence, participants receive increasingly valuable reinforcers.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- provide voluntary informed consent
- meet DSM-5 criteria for MA or amphetamine use disorder
- provide at least one urine sample positive for MA/amphetamine metabolites during screening (i.e. prior to the commencement of the study).
- aged 18-45
- right-handed
- English-speaking
You may not qualify if:
- currently receiving treatment for stimulant addiction or needing more intensive treatment than outpatient care
- meet DSM-5 criteria for substance use disorder other than nicotine
- unable to attend 4+ visits during the 2-week screening period or to complete measures
- Physical or mental illness that would require intervention that would alter imaging or that would interfere with safe study participation
- pregnant, claustrophobic, or have metal prostheses, cardiac pacemakers, or metal clips that are incompatible with the scanner
- HIV positive status
- unable to comprehend written or spoken English
- currently taking psychiatric medication
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of California, Los Angeleslead
- University of Cape Towncollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Department of Psychiatry at Groote Schuur Hospital
Cape Town, 7925, South Africa
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 13, 2016
First Posted
September 20, 2016
Study Start
September 1, 2015
Primary Completion
February 15, 2018
Study Completion
February 15, 2018
Last Updated
May 10, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Data will be shared with other investigators following publication of the main paper or 2 years after the last subject completes participation, whichever comes first. Shared data will be stripped of all PHI and potentially personally identifying variables. Requests should briefly state the concept of interest, provide a brief timeline for analyzing the data and preparing a manuscript, and include a copy of the CV of the investigator making the request and documentation of proof of training in the ethical treatment of human subjects in research. The concept proposal will be evaluated based on three criteria, including the potential impact or contribution to the research in advancing knowledge; the feasibility of the proposed research; and that the aim of the proposed research will not overlap with any of the aims or planned analyses.