Filgotinib Versus Placebo in Adults With Active Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) Who Have an Inadequate Response to Biologic Disease-modifying Anti-rheumatic Drug(s) (DMARDs) Treatment
FINCH 2
A Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-controlled, Multicenter, Phase 3 Study to Assess the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib Administered for 24 Weeks in Combination With Conventional Synthetic Disease-modifying Anti-rheumatic Drug(s) (csDMARDs) to Subjects With Moderately to Severely Active Rheumatoid Arthritis Who Have an Inadequate Response to Biologic DMARD(s) Treatment
2 other identifiers
interventional
449
15 countries
104
Brief Summary
The primary objective of this study is to evaluate the effects of filgotinib versus placebo for the treatment of signs and symptoms of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) as measured by the percentage of participants achieving an American College of Rheumatology 20% improvement response (ACR20) at Week 12.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3 rheumatoid-arthritis
Started Jul 2016
104 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
July 27, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 17, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 22, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 20, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 26, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 15, 2021
CompletedMay 13, 2021
April 1, 2021
1.6 years
August 17, 2016
December 21, 2020
April 21, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved an American College of Rheumatology (ACR) 20% Improvement (ACR20) Response at Week 12
ACR20 response is achieved when the participant has: ≥20% improvement (reduction) from baseline in tender joint count based on 68 joints (TJC68), swollen joint count based on 66 joints (SJC66) and in at least 3 of the following 5 items: physician's global assessment of disease activity (PGA) and subject's global assessment of disease activity (SGA) assessed using visual analog scale (VAS) on a scale of 0-100 \[0 and 100 indicating no disease activity and maximum disease activity\]; subject's pain assessment using VAS on a scale of 0-100 \[0 and 100 indicating no pain and unbearable pain\]; health assessment questionnaire-disability index (HAQ-DI) score contains 20 questions, 8 components: dressing/grooming, arising, eating, walking, hygiene, reach, grip and activities and scored on a scale of 0-3 \[0 and 3 indicating without difficulty and unable to do\]; high-sensitivity C-reactive protein (hsCRP). Participants with missing outcomes were set as non-responders.
Week 12
Secondary Outcomes (40)
Change From Baseline in the Health Assessment Questionnaire-Disability Index (HAQ-DI) Score at Week 12
Baseline; Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved Disease Activity Score for 28 Joint Count Using C-Reactive Protein [DAS28 (CRP)] ≤ 3.2 at Week 12
Week 12
Change From Baseline in 36-Item Short Form Survey (SF-36) Physical Component Summary (PCS) Score at Week 12
Baseline; Week 12
Percentage of Participants Who Achieved DAS28 (CRP) < 2.6 at Week 24
Week 24
Change From Baseline in Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy (FACIT)-Fatigue Score at Week 12
Baseline; Week 12
- +35 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Filgotinib 200 mg
EXPERIMENTALFilgotinib 200 mg + placebo to match filgotinib 100 mg + stable dose of permitted csDMARD(s)
Filgotinib 100 mg
EXPERIMENTALFilgotinib 100 mg + placebo to match filgotinib 200 mg + stable dose of permitted csDMARD(s)
Placebo
PLACEBO COMPARATORPlacebo to match filgotinib 200 mg + placebo to match filgotinib 100 mg + stable dose of permitted csDMARD(s)
Interventions
Tablet(s) administered orally once daily
Tablet(s) administered orally once daily
csDMARDs may include one or two of the following: methotrexate (MTX), hydroxychloroquine or chloroquine, sulfasalazine, and/or leflunomide (combination of leflunomide and MTX is not allowed)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Have a diagnosis of RA (2010 American College of Rheumatology \[ACR\]/European League Against Rheumatism \[EULAR\] criteria for RA), and are ACR functional class I-III.
- Have ≥ 6 swollen joints (from a swollen joint count based on 66 joints \[SJC66\]) and ≥6 tender joints (from a tender joint count based on 68 joints \[TJC68\]) at screening and Day 1
- Ongoing treatment with a stable prescription of 1 or 2 csDMARDs
- Have received at least one biologic disease modifying antirheumatic drug (bDMARD) for the treatment of RA to which they have had an inadequate response or intolerance
You may not qualify if:
- Previous treatment with any janus kinase (JAK) inhibitor
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Gilead Scienceslead
- Galapagos NVcollaborator
Study Sites (104)
Unknown Facility
Huntsville, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Gilbert, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Covina, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Hemet, California, United States
Unknown Facility
La Jolla, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Palm Desert, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Palo Alto, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Riverside, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Upland, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Victorville, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Whittier, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Aventura, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
DeBary, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Orlando, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Plantation, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Port Richey, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Decatur, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Kansas City, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Wichita, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Elizabethtown, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Cumberland, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Frederick, Maryland, United States
Unknown Facility
Worcester, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
Detroit, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Saint Clair Shores, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Hattiesburg, Mississippi, United States
Unknown Facility
Tupelo, Mississippi, United States
Unknown Facility
St Louis, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Lincoln, Nebraska, United States
Unknown Facility
Lebanon, New Hampshire, United States
Unknown Facility
Freehold, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Toms River, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Brooklyn, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Greenville, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Salisbury, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Middleburg Heights, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Tulsa, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Wyomissing, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Charleston, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Columbia, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Myrtle Beach, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Orangeburg, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Memphis, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Beaumont, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Corpus Christi, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Mesquite, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Plano, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Webster, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Buenos Aires, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Caba, Argentina
Unknown Facility
San Juan, Argentina
Unknown Facility
Victoria Park, Western Australia, Australia
Unknown Facility
Ghent, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Leuven, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Merksem, Belgium
Unknown Facility
Montpellier, France
Unknown Facility
Berlin, Germany
Unknown Facility
Hamburg, Germany
Unknown Facility
Ratingen, Germany
Unknown Facility
Budapest, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Gyula, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Székesfehérvár, Hungary
Unknown Facility
Haifa, Israel
Unknown Facility
Ramat Gan, Israel
Unknown Facility
Hiroshima, Japan
Unknown Facility
Izumo, Japan
Unknown Facility
Katō, Japan
Unknown Facility
Kawagoe, Japan
Unknown Facility
Kumamoto, Japan
Unknown Facility
Narashino, Japan
Unknown Facility
Okayama, Japan
Unknown Facility
Sagamihara, Japan
Unknown Facility
Sapporo, Japan
Unknown Facility
Shinjuku-Ku, Japan
Unknown Facility
Takaoka, Japan
Unknown Facility
Takasaki, Japan
Unknown Facility
Tokorozawa, Japan
Unknown Facility
Tokyo, Japan
Unknown Facility
Tomigusuku, Japan
Unknown Facility
Chihuahua City, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Distrito Federal, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Mérida, Mexico
Unknown Facility
Bialystok, Poland
Unknown Facility
Poznan, Poland
Unknown Facility
Warsaw, Poland
Unknown Facility
Wroclaw, Poland
Unknown Facility
Seoul, South Korea
Unknown Facility
Madrid, Spain
Unknown Facility
Málaga, Spain
Unknown Facility
Sabadell, Spain
Unknown Facility
Valencia, Spain
Unknown Facility
Sankt Gallen, Switzerland
Unknown Facility
Doncaster, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Goodmayes, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Harlow, United Kingdom
Unknown Facility
Newcastle upon Tyne, United Kingdom
Related Publications (8)
Genovese MC, Kalunian KC, Walker D, Gottenberg JE, De Vlam K, Mozaffarian N, et al. Safety and Efficacy of Filgotinib in a Phase 3 Trial of Patients with Active Rheumatoid Arthritis and Inadequate Response or Intolerance to Biologic Dmards [Abstract No. L06]. ACR/ARHP Annual Meeting; 2018 19-24 October; Chicago, IL, USA.
RESULTGenovese MC, Kalunian K, Gottenberg JE, Mozaffarian N, Bartok B, Matzkies F, Gao J, Guo Y, Tasset C, Sundy JS, de Vlam K, Walker D, Takeuchi T. Effect of Filgotinib vs Placebo on Clinical Response in Patients With Moderate to Severe Rheumatoid Arthritis Refractory to Disease-Modifying Antirheumatic Drug Therapy: The FINCH 2 Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2019 Jul 23;322(4):315-325. doi: 10.1001/jama.2019.9055.
PMID: 31334793RESULTTaylor PC, Downie B, Han L, Hawtin R, Hertz A, Moots RJ, Takeuchi T. Patients with High Baseline Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio Exhibit Better Response to Filgotinib as Treatment for Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Oct;11(5):1383-1392. doi: 10.1007/s40744-024-00695-w. Epub 2024 Jul 10.
PMID: 38985247DERIVEDCurtis JR, Emery P, Downie B, Zhong Y, Liu J, Han L, Hawtin RE, Burmester GR. Filgotinib Demonstrates Efficacy in Rheumatoid Arthritis Independent of Smoking Status: Post Hoc Analysis of Phase 3 Trials and Claims-Based Analysis. Rheumatol Ther. 2024 Feb;11(1):177-189. doi: 10.1007/s40744-023-00619-0. Epub 2023 Dec 6.
PMID: 38057656DERIVEDBalsa A, Wassenberg S, Tanaka Y, Tournadre A, Orzechowski HD, Rajendran V, Lendl U, Stiers PJ, Watson C, Caporali R, Galloway J, Verschueren P. Effect of Filgotinib on Body Mass Index (BMI) and Effect of Baseline BMI on the Efficacy and Safety of Filgotinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther. 2023 Dec;10(6):1555-1574. doi: 10.1007/s40744-023-00599-1. Epub 2023 Sep 25.
PMID: 37747626DERIVEDCombe B, Besuyen R, Gomez-Centeno A, Matsubara T, Sancho Jimenez JJ, Yin Z, Buch MH. Geographic Analysis of the Safety and Efficacy of Filgotinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis. Rheumatol Ther. 2023 Feb;10(1):35-51. doi: 10.1007/s40744-022-00494-1. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
PMID: 36205910DERIVEDBingham CO 3rd, Walker D, Nash P, Lee SJ, Ye L, Hu H, Khalid JM, Combe B. The impact of filgotinib on patient-reported outcomes and health-related quality of life for patients with active rheumatoid arthritis: a post hoc analysis of Phase 3 studies. Arthritis Res Ther. 2022 Jan 3;24(1):11. doi: 10.1186/s13075-021-02677-7.
PMID: 34980223DERIVEDTakeuchi T, Matsubara T, Atsumi T, Amano K, Ishiguro N, Sugiyama E, Yamaoka K, Genovese MC, Kalunian K, Walker D, Gottenberg JE, de Vlam K, Bartok B, Pechonkina A, Kondo A, Gao J, Guo Y, Tasset C, Sundy JS, Tanaka Y. Efficacy and safety of filgotinib in Japanese patients with refractory rheumatoid arthritis: Subgroup analyses of a global phase 3 study (FINCH 2). Mod Rheumatol. 2022 Jan 5;32(1):59-67. doi: 10.1080/14397595.2020.1859675.
PMID: 33274687DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Gilead Clinical Study Information Center
- Organization
- Gilead Sciences
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Gilead Study Director
Gilead Sciences
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 17, 2016
First Posted
August 22, 2016
Study Start
July 27, 2016
Primary Completion
March 20, 2018
Study Completion
June 26, 2018
Last Updated
May 13, 2021
Results First Posted
January 15, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share