Study to Assess if ABP798 is Safe & Effective in Treating Non Hodgkin Lymphoma Compared to Rituximab
JASMINE
A Randomized, Double-Blind Study Evaluating the Efficacy, Safety and Immunogenicity of ABP 798 Compared With Rituximab in Subjects With CD20 Positive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma (NHL)
2 other identifiers
interventional
256
20 countries
98
Brief Summary
This was a randomized, double-blind, active-controlled, multiple-dose, clinical similarity study to evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, safety, tolerability and immunogenicity of ABP 798 compared with rituximab in subjects with grade 1, 2, or 3a follicular B-cell NHL and low tumor burden. Subjects were randomized in a 1:1 ratio to receive a 375 mg/m\^2 intravenous infusion of either ABP 798 or rituximab once weekly for 4 weeks followed by dosing at weeks 12 and 20.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started May 2016
Typical duration for phase_3
98 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 19, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 21, 2016
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 25, 2016
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 28, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 28, 2019
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 18, 2020
CompletedSeptember 10, 2022
September 1, 2022
3.1 years
April 19, 2016
June 26, 2020
September 8, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Percentage of Participants Who Responded (Overall Response Rate - ORR) by Week 28 Based on Independent Central Assessment of Disease
Overall response within the first treatment cycle was assessed according to International Working Group - Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma criteria (IWG-NHL criteria \[Cheson et al, 1999\]) by a central reader. Response was evaluated using computerized tomography (CT) scans and positron emission tomography (PET) (to assess nodal disease/organ enlargement), and bone marrow biopsy (to assess bone marrow infiltration). ORR was the percentage of participants with a best overall response of complete response (CR), unconfirmed complete response (CRu) or partial response (PR). Participants that do not meet the criteria for response were considered non-responders. CR was defined as no evidence of disease. CRu showed nodes in the original sum of the products (SPD) regressed by \>75% and/or indeterminate bone marrow results. PR was a ≥ 50% decrease in SPD of the six largest dominant nodes; \>=50% decrease in liver and spleen nodes, and no increase in size of other nodes nor any new sites of disease.
Post treatment up to Week 28
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Percentage of Participants Who Responded (Overall Response Rate - ORR) at Week 12 Based on Independent Central Assessment of Disease
Week 12
Pharmacokinetic Serum Concentrations by Visit
Weeks 2, 3, 4, 12 and 20
Percentage of Participants With Complete Depletion of Clusters of Differentiation 19-Positive (CD19+) Cell Count From Baseline to Day 8
Baseline (Day 1), Study Day 8
Total Immunoglobulin G (IgG) Results by Visit
Baseline (Day 1), Day 8 (Week 2), Weeks 3, 4, 28
Total Immunoglobulin M (IgM) Results by Visit
Baseline (Day 1), Day 8 (Week 2), Weeks 3, 4, 28
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
ABP 798
EXPERIMENTALABP 798 was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m\^2 as an intravenous (IV) infusion once weekly for 4 weeks followed by dosing at weeks 12 and 20.
Rituximab
ACTIVE COMPARATORRituximab was administered at a dose of 375 mg/m\^2 as an IV infusion once weekly for 4 weeks followed by dosing at weeks 12 and 20.
Interventions
ABP 798 was supplied as a sterile, preservative-free liquid concentrate for IV infusion at a concentration of 10 mg/mL in either 100 mg/10 mL or 500 mg/50 mL single-dose vials. Subjects were to receive premedications before each infusion. Premedications were to be given according to local practice for administration of rituximab therapy.
Rituximab was procured from commercial supplies in the US and was supplied as a sterile, clear, colorless, preservative-free liquid concentrate for IV infusion at a concentration of 10 mg/mL in either 100-mg/10 mL or 500-mg/50 mL single-dose vials. Subjects were to receive premedications before each infusion. Premedications were to be given according to local practice for administration of rituximab therapy.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Males and females 18 years of age and older
- Histological confirmed (by lymph node or extranodal region biopsy), Grade 1, 2, or 3a follicular B-cell NHL expressing CD20 within 12 months before randomization
- Stage 2, 3, or 4 (per Cotswold's Modification of Ann Arbor Staging System) with measurable disease (per International Working Group)
- subjects must have a baseline scan (computed tomography \[CT\]) of the neck (if palpable lymph node \> 1.0 cm), chest, abdomen, and pelvis to assess disease burden within 6 weeks before randomization
- subjects must have had a baseline bone marrow biopsy within 12 months before randomization. Previously confirmed positive bone marrow involvement does not need to be repeated for purposes of screening.
- Low tumor burden based on the Groupe d'Etudes des Lymphomes Folliculaires (GELF) criteria
- largest nodal or extranodal mass ≤ 7 cm
- no more than 3 nodal sites with diameter \> 3 cm
- no splenomegaly \> 16cm by CT scan and no symptomatic splenomegaly
- no significant pleural or peritoneal serous effusions by CT
- lactate dehydrogenase ≤ upper limit of normal (ULN)
- no B symptoms (night sweats, fever \[temperature \> 38°C\], weight loss \> 10% in the previous 6 months)
You may not qualify if:
- Diffuse large cell component and/or Grade 3b follicular NHL
- History or known presence of central nervous system metastases
- Malignancy other than NHL within 5 years (except treated in-situ cervical cancer, or squamous or basal cell carcinoma of the skin)
- Recent infection requiring a course of systemic anti-infective agents that was completed ≤ 7 days before randomization (with the exception of uncomplicated urinary tract infection)
- Other investigational procedures that can impact the study data, results, or patient safety while participating in this study are excluded; participation in observational studies is allowed.
- Subject is currently enrolled in or has not yet completed at least 30 days or 5 half-lives (whichever is longer) since ending other investigational device or drug study(s), including vaccines, or subject is receiving other investigational agent(s)
- Previous use of either commercially available or investigational chemotherapy, biological, or immunological therapy for NHL (including rituximab or biosimilar rituximab, or other anti-CD20 treatments)
- Systemic corticosteroid use within 3 months before randomization (inhaled are allowable)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Amgenlead
Study Sites (98)
Research Site
Encinitas, California, 92024-1332, United States
Research Site
Mount Sterling, Kentucky, 40353, United States
Research Site
Billings, Montana, 59102, United States
Research Site
Zanesville, Ohio, 43701, United States
Research Site
Roanoke, Virginia, 24014, United States
Research Site
Gosford, New South Wales, 2250, Australia
Research Site
Frankston, Victoria, 3199, Australia
Research Site
Perth, Western Australia, 6000, Australia
Research Site
Plovdiv, 4002, Bulgaria
Research Site
Stara Zagora, 6000, Bulgaria
Research Site
Windsor, Ontario, N8W 2X3, Canada
Research Site
Medellín, Antioquia, 050034, Colombia
Research Site
Bogota, Cundinamarca, 110111, Colombia
Research Site
Prague, Prague, 150 06, Czechia
Research Site
Ostrava - Poruba, Severomoravsky KRAJ, 708 52, Czechia
Research Site
Bordeaux, Aquitaine, 33077, France
Research Site
Clermont-Ferrand, Auvergne, 63050, France
Research Site
Cesson-Sévigné, Brittany Region, 35576, France
Research Site
Boulogne-sur-Mer, Hauts-de-France, 62321, France
Research Site
La Rochelle, Poitou-charentes, 17000, France
Research Site
Poitiers, Poitou-charentes, 86021, France
Research Site
Batumi, 6000, Georgia
Research Site
Tbilisi, 0112, Georgia
Research Site
Tbilisi, 0160, Georgia
Research Site
Tbilisi, 0186, Georgia
Research Site
Freiburg im Breisgau, Baden-Wurttemberg, 79110, Germany
Research Site
Augsburg, Bavaria, 86156, Germany
Research Site
Würzburg, Bavaria, 97080, Germany
Research Site
Kassel, Hesse, 34125, Germany
Research Site
Münster, North Rhine-Westphalia, 48149, Germany
Research Site
Leipzig, Saxony, 04103, Germany
Research Site
Flensburg, Schleswig-Holstein, 24939, Germany
Research Site
Athens, Attica, 11525, Greece
Research Site
Athens, Attica, 11527, Greece
Research Site
Patra, Peloponnese, 26504, Greece
Research Site
Surat, Gujarat, 395010, India
Research Site
Vadodara, Gujarat, 390001, India
Research Site
Bangalore, Karnataka, 560068, India
Research Site
Mangalore, Karnataka, 575001, India
Research Site
Nashik, Maharashtra, 422004, India
Research Site
Pune, Maharashtra, 411 001, India
Research Site
Bikaner, Rajasthan, 334 003, India
Research Site
Be’er Ya‘aqov, Rehoboth, 7030000, Israel
Research Site
San Giovanni Rotondo, Foggia, 71013, Italy
Research Site
Bergamo, Lombardy, 24127, Italy
Research Site
Pesaro, Pesaro E Urbino, 61100, Italy
Research Site
Aviano, Pordenone, 33081, Italy
Research Site
Candiolo, Torino, 10060, Italy
Research Site
Brescia, 25123, Italy
Research Site
Milan, 20141, Italy
Research Site
Milan, 20153, Italy
Research Site
Padua, 35128, Italy
Research Site
Parma, 43126, Italy
Research Site
Ravenna, 48100, Italy
Research Site
Rimini, 47900, Italy
Research Site
Terni, 05100, Italy
Research Site
Chiba, Chiba, 260-8717, Japan
Research Site
Fukuoka, Fukuoka, 811-1395, Japan
Research Site
Maebashi, Gunma, 371-8511, Japan
Research Site
Kobe, Hyōgo, 650-0047, Japan
Research Site
Tsu, Mie-ken, 514-8507, Japan
Research Site
Utsunomiya, Tochigi, 320-0834, Japan
Research Site
Tachikawa, Tokyo, 190-0014, Japan
Research Site
Tokyo, 150-8935, Japan
Research Site
Mexico City, Mexico City, 01120, Mexico
Research Site
Chihuahua City, 31203, Mexico
Research Site
Torun, Kuyavian-Pomeranian Voivodeship, 87-100, Poland
Research Site
Krakow, Lesser Poland Voivodeship, 31-826, Poland
Research Site
Legnica, Lower Silesian Voivodeship, 59-220, Poland
Research Site
Gdansk, Pomeranian Voivodeship, 80-219, Poland
Research Site
Târgu Mureş, Mureș County, 540042, Romania
Research Site
Târgu Mureş, Mureș County, 540136, Romania
Research Site
Timișoara, Timiș County, 300021, Romania
Research Site
Bucharest, 030171, Romania
Research Site
Seoul, Gyeonggi-do, 135-710, South Korea
Research Site
Seoul, Gyeonggi-do, 158-710, South Korea
Research Site
Jinju, Gyeongsangnam-do, 52727, South Korea
Research Site
Pusan, Gyeongsangnam-do, 48108, South Korea
Research Site
Daegu, 41931, South Korea
Research Site
Daegu, 42415, South Korea
Research Site
Seoul, 03080, South Korea
Research Site
Seoul, 03181, South Korea
Research Site
Seoul, 03722, South Korea
Research Site
Ulsan, 44033, South Korea
Research Site
Sabadell, Barcelona, 08208, Spain
Research Site
Córdoba, Cordoba, 14004, Spain
Research Site
Majadahonda, Madrid, 28222, Spain
Research Site
La Laguna Tenerife, Santa CRUZ DE Tenerife, 38320, Spain
Research Site
Barcelona, 08003, Spain
Research Site
Cadiz, 11009, Spain
Research Site
Cáceres, 10003, Spain
Research Site
Madrid, 28046, Spain
Research Site
Salamanca, 37007, Spain
Research Site
Kyiv, Kyiv City, 03115, Ukraine
Research Site
Kyiv, Kyiv City, 04112, Ukraine
Research Site
Uzhhorod, Zakarpattia Oblast, 88014, Ukraine
Research Site
Chernivtsi, 58013, Ukraine
Research Site
Dnipropetrovsk, 49055, Ukraine
Related Publications (1)
Niederwieser D, Hamm C, Cobb P, Mo M, Forsyth C, Tucci A, Hanes V, Delwail V, Hajek R, Chien D. Efficacy and Safety of ABP 798: Results from the JASMINE Trial in Patients with Follicular Lymphoma in Comparison with Rituximab Reference Product. Target Oncol. 2020 Oct;15(5):599-611. doi: 10.1007/s11523-020-00748-4.
PMID: 33044684DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Amgen Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
MD
Amgen
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 19, 2016
First Posted
April 21, 2016
Study Start
May 25, 2016
Primary Completion
June 28, 2019
Study Completion
June 28, 2019
Last Updated
September 10, 2022
Results First Posted
August 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2022-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF, CSR
- Time Frame
- Data sharing requests relating to this study will be considered beginning 18 months after the study has ended and either 1) the product and indication (or other new use) have been granted marketing authorization in both the US and Europe or 2) clinical development for the product and/or indication discontinues and the data will not be submitted to regulatory authorities. There is no end date for eligibility to submit a data sharing request for this study.
- Access Criteria
- Qualified researchers may submit a request containing the research objectives, the Amgen product(s) and Amgen study/studies in scope, endpoints/outcomes of interest, statistical analysis plan, data requirements, publication plan, and qualifications of the researcher(s). In general, Amgen does not grant external requests for individual patient data for the purpose of re-evaluating safety and efficacy issues already addressed in the product labelling. Requests are reviewed by a committee of internal advisors, and if not approved, may be further arbitrated by a Data Sharing Independent Review Panel. Upon approval, information necessary to address the research question will be provided under the terms of a data sharing agreement. This may include anonymized individual patient data and/or available supporting documents, containing fragments of analysis code where provided in analysis specifications. Further details are available at the link below.
De-identified individual patient data for variables necessary to address the specific research question in an approved data sharing request