NCT02097030

Brief Summary

The objective of the study is to compare the overall subjective preference of filcon II 3 daily disposable silicone hyrogel contact lenses compared to etafilcon A and nelfilcon A daily disposable conventional hydrogel contact lenses.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
35

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2014

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2014

Completed
23 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 24, 2014

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 26, 2014

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 1, 2014

Completed
1.9 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 15, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

July 31, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

March 24, 2014

Results QC Date

August 6, 2015

Last Update Submit

July 19, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Overall Lens Preference - All Study Lenses

    Participant's subjective response for overall lens preference after 3 days of daily disposable wear of each pair of lenses. Surveyed at exit. (4 possible ratings: Strongly prefer pair#1, Slightly prefer pair #1, Slightly prefer pair #2, Strongly prefer pair #2).

    Study Exit

  • Overall Lens Preference - Hydrogel vs. Filcon II 3

    Participant's subjective response for overall lens preference after 3 days of daily disposable wear of each pair. Surveyed at exit. (4 possible ratings: Strongly prefer pair#1, Slightly prefer pair #1, Slightly prefer pair #2, Strongly prefer pair #2).

    Study Exit

Secondary Outcomes (17)

  • Subjective Response for Comfort

    Baseline and 3 day follow-up

  • Subjective Response for Vision

    Baseline and 3 day follow-up

  • Subjective Response for Insertion

    Baseline

  • Subjective Response for Handling (Insertion and Removal)

    3 days follow-up

  • Subjective Response for Dryness

    3 Days Follow-up

  • +12 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (3)

etafilcon A lens

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants were randomized to either the etafilcon A or the nelfilcon A lens for three days and then both groups wore the filcon II 3 lens for three days, without washout period between lens types.

Device: etafilcon A

nelfilcon A lens

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants were randomized to either the etafilcon A or the nelfilcon A lens for three days and then both groups wore the filcon II 3 lens for three days, without washout period between lens types.

Device: nelfilcon A

filcon II 3 lens

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants were randomized to either the etafilcon A or the nelfilcon A lens for three days and then both groups wore the filcon II 3 lens for three days, without washout period between lens types.

Device: filcon II 3

Interventions

Participants wear a first pair of lenses for three days and then crossover and wear a second pair of lenses for three days.

Also known as: Silicone Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lens
filcon II 3 lens

Participants wear a first pair of lenses for three days and then crossover and wear a second pair of lenses for three days.

Also known as: Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lens
etafilcon A lens

Participants wear a first pair of lenses for three days and then crossover and wear a second pair of lenses for three days.

Also known as: Hydrogel Daily Disposable Contact Lens
nelfilcon A lens

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 40 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive)
  • Has had a self-reported visual exam in the last two years
  • Is an adapted soft CL wearer
  • Must be able to wear their lenses at least 3 full days, 10 hours per day, assuming there are no contraindications for doing so
  • Has a CL spherical prescription between - 1.00 and - 6.00 (inclusive)
  • Has less than 1.25 D spectacle cylinder in each eye.
  • Baseline vision of 20/40 or better (in each eye) with their habitual vision correction or 20/20 best-corrected.
  • Is correctable to at least 20/25 distance visual acuity with study contact lenses in each eye
  • Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease
  • Has read, understood and signed the information consent letter
  • Is willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least 3 full days)
  • Is willing to comply with the visit schedule

You may not qualify if:

  • Has never worn contact lenses before.
  • Currently wears rigid gas permeable contact lenses.
  • Has a history of not achieving comfortable CL wear (3 days per week; \> 8 hours/day)
  • Has a CL prescription outside the range of - 1.00 to -6.00D
  • Has a spectacle cylinder greater than -1.25D of cylinder in either eye.
  • Has best corrected spectacle distance vision worse then 20/25 in either eye.
  • Has any systemic disease affecting ocular health.
  • Is using any systemic or topical medications, (includes rewetting drops, artificial tears and allergy drops), that will affect ocular health. Occasional use is acceptable but not during the trial.
  • Has any ocular pathology or severe insufficiency of lacrimal secretion
  • Has persistent, clinically significant corneal or conjunctival staining
  • Has active neovascularization or any central corneal scars.
  • Is aphakic.
  • Is presbyopic.
  • Has undergone corneal refractive surgery.
  • Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of California, Berkeley Clinical Research Center (UCB-CRC)

Berkeley, California, 94720-2020, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Refractive ErrorsEye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Jose A. Vega, OD, Sr. Manager Global Medical Scientific Affairs
Organization
CooperVision

Study Officials

  • Meng C Lin, OD, PhD

    University of California, Berkeley

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 24, 2014

First Posted

March 26, 2014

Study Start

March 1, 2014

Primary Completion

April 1, 2014

Study Completion

April 1, 2014

Last Updated

July 31, 2020

Results First Posted

February 15, 2016

Record last verified: 2020-07

Locations