Clinical Evaluation of Daily Disposable Contact Lenses
Single-Center Clinical Evaluation of Daily Disposable Contact Lenses
1 other identifier
interventional
35
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The objective of the study is to compare the overall subjective preference of filcon II 3 daily disposable silicone hyrogel contact lenses compared to etafilcon A and nelfilcon A daily disposable conventional hydrogel contact lenses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 24, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 26, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 15, 2016
CompletedJuly 31, 2020
July 1, 2020
1 month
March 24, 2014
August 6, 2015
July 19, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Overall Lens Preference - All Study Lenses
Participant's subjective response for overall lens preference after 3 days of daily disposable wear of each pair of lenses. Surveyed at exit. (4 possible ratings: Strongly prefer pair#1, Slightly prefer pair #1, Slightly prefer pair #2, Strongly prefer pair #2).
Study Exit
Overall Lens Preference - Hydrogel vs. Filcon II 3
Participant's subjective response for overall lens preference after 3 days of daily disposable wear of each pair. Surveyed at exit. (4 possible ratings: Strongly prefer pair#1, Slightly prefer pair #1, Slightly prefer pair #2, Strongly prefer pair #2).
Study Exit
Secondary Outcomes (17)
Subjective Response for Comfort
Baseline and 3 day follow-up
Subjective Response for Vision
Baseline and 3 day follow-up
Subjective Response for Insertion
Baseline
Subjective Response for Handling (Insertion and Removal)
3 days follow-up
Subjective Response for Dryness
3 Days Follow-up
- +12 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
etafilcon A lens
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants were randomized to either the etafilcon A or the nelfilcon A lens for three days and then both groups wore the filcon II 3 lens for three days, without washout period between lens types.
nelfilcon A lens
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants were randomized to either the etafilcon A or the nelfilcon A lens for three days and then both groups wore the filcon II 3 lens for three days, without washout period between lens types.
filcon II 3 lens
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants were randomized to either the etafilcon A or the nelfilcon A lens for three days and then both groups wore the filcon II 3 lens for three days, without washout period between lens types.
Interventions
Participants wear a first pair of lenses for three days and then crossover and wear a second pair of lenses for three days.
Participants wear a first pair of lenses for three days and then crossover and wear a second pair of lenses for three days.
Participants wear a first pair of lenses for three days and then crossover and wear a second pair of lenses for three days.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive)
- Has had a self-reported visual exam in the last two years
- Is an adapted soft CL wearer
- Must be able to wear their lenses at least 3 full days, 10 hours per day, assuming there are no contraindications for doing so
- Has a CL spherical prescription between - 1.00 and - 6.00 (inclusive)
- Has less than 1.25 D spectacle cylinder in each eye.
- Baseline vision of 20/40 or better (in each eye) with their habitual vision correction or 20/20 best-corrected.
- Is correctable to at least 20/25 distance visual acuity with study contact lenses in each eye
- Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease
- Has read, understood and signed the information consent letter
- Is willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least 3 full days)
- Is willing to comply with the visit schedule
You may not qualify if:
- Has never worn contact lenses before.
- Currently wears rigid gas permeable contact lenses.
- Has a history of not achieving comfortable CL wear (3 days per week; \> 8 hours/day)
- Has a CL prescription outside the range of - 1.00 to -6.00D
- Has a spectacle cylinder greater than -1.25D of cylinder in either eye.
- Has best corrected spectacle distance vision worse then 20/25 in either eye.
- Has any systemic disease affecting ocular health.
- Is using any systemic or topical medications, (includes rewetting drops, artificial tears and allergy drops), that will affect ocular health. Occasional use is acceptable but not during the trial.
- Has any ocular pathology or severe insufficiency of lacrimal secretion
- Has persistent, clinically significant corneal or conjunctival staining
- Has active neovascularization or any central corneal scars.
- Is aphakic.
- Is presbyopic.
- Has undergone corneal refractive surgery.
- Is participating in any other type of eye related clinical or research study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of California, Berkeley Clinical Research Center (UCB-CRC)
Berkeley, California, 94720-2020, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Jose A. Vega, OD, Sr. Manager Global Medical Scientific Affairs
- Organization
- CooperVision
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Meng C Lin, OD, PhD
University of California, Berkeley
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 24, 2014
First Posted
March 26, 2014
Study Start
March 1, 2014
Primary Completion
April 1, 2014
Study Completion
April 1, 2014
Last Updated
July 31, 2020
Results First Posted
February 15, 2016
Record last verified: 2020-07