NCT00600080

Brief Summary

This study seeks to evaluate the clinical performance of a recently improved daily disposable contact lens to an established daily disposable contact lens that contains a wetting agent.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2007

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 1, 2007

Completed
20 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 21, 2007

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 24, 2008

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

March 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2008

Completed
4.5 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 23, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

May 21, 2015

Status Verified

May 1, 2015

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

December 21, 2007

Results QC Date

October 20, 2011

Last Update Submit

May 5, 2015

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Visual Acuity

    Measured using high contrast and low contrast vision charts without the use of spectacles (glasses) or refraction equipment (for contact lens wearers). Values are on the logMar scale where lower values (\< 0) refer to 'better' values of sight. These scores are converted from a Snellen eye chart examination.

    2-week

  • Subjective Lens Comfort

    Subjects were asked to rate lens performance on a scale of 0 to 100 point scale (0= "Extremely poor" or "Cannot use lenses" and 100= "Excellent" or "Highly impressed with these lenses overall"). The average score is reported. A factor analysis was used to identify the questions pertaining to product performance, a factor loading of 0.4 or greater was used.

    2-week

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Subject-reported Overall Product Performance

    2-week

  • Optimum Lens Fit

    Baseline, 1-week, 2-week

Study Arms (2)

etafilcon A first nelfilcon A second

OTHER

etafilcon A worn daily during week 1, nelfilcon A worn daily for week 2

Device: etafilcon ADevice: nelfilcon A

nelfilcon A first, etafilcon A second

OTHER

nelfilcon A worn daily during week 1, etafilcon A worn daily for week 2

Device: etafilcon ADevice: nelfilcon A

Interventions

contact lens worn daily for one week (first or second week depending on arm)

Also known as: 1-DAY ACUVUE MOIST
etafilcon A first nelfilcon A secondnelfilcon A first, etafilcon A second

Contact lens worn daily for one week (first or second week depending on arm)

Also known as: DAILIES AquaComfort Plus
etafilcon A first nelfilcon A secondnelfilcon A first, etafilcon A second

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • They are of legal age (18 years) and capacity to volunteer.
  • They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing to sign a Statement of Informed Consent.
  • They are willing and able to follow the protocol.
  • They would be expected to attain at least 6/9 (20/30) in each eye with the study lenses.
  • They are able to wear contact lenses with a back vertex power of -1.00 to -6.00DS.
  • They have a maximum of 1.00D of refractive astigmatism (i.e. ≤ 1.00 DC).
  • They have successfully worn contact lenses within six months of starting the study. -

You may not qualify if:

  • They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
  • They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
  • They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment.
  • They are aphakic.
  • They have had corneal refractive surgery.
  • They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or has keratoconus.
  • They are pregnant or lactating.
  • They have grade 2 or greater of any of the following ocular surface signs: corneal oedema, corneal vascularisation, corneal staining, tarsal conjunctival changes or any other abnormality which would normally contraindicate contact lens wear.
  • They have any infectious disease (e.g. hepatitis) or any immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV).
  • They have diabetes.
  • They have taken part in any other clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Eurolens Research, The University of Manchester Dpt. of Optometry & Neuroscience

Manchester, M60 1QD, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Refractive ErrorsEye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Kurt Moody, OD
Organization
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 21, 2007

First Posted

January 24, 2008

Study Start

December 1, 2007

Primary Completion

March 1, 2008

Study Completion

March 1, 2008

Last Updated

May 21, 2015

Results First Posted

August 23, 2012

Record last verified: 2015-05

Locations