Multi-center Clinical Evaluation of PC 1-Day vs 1-Day Acuvue Moist
1 other identifier
interventional
43
1 country
4
Brief Summary
The objective of this study is to compare the clinical performance of ProClear 1-Day versus 1-Day Acuvue Moist each for one week of daily disposable wear.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 27, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 31, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 20, 2016
CompletedJuly 30, 2020
July 1, 2020
Same day
December 27, 2013
February 24, 2016
July 19, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (11)
Comfort (Subjective Assessment)
Subjective Assessment of comfort on insertion at baseline for each pair using questionnaire and rated on subjective response scale. (0-10; 0= very uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel)
Baseline
Comfort (Subjective Assessment)
Subjective Assessment: Insertion Comfort, Comfort During Day, Comfort Prior to Removal, Comfort Overall for each pair using questionnaire and rated on subjective response scale. (0-10; 0= very uncomfortable, 10=cannot feel)
1 Week
Hydration (Subjective Assessment)
Subjective Assessment of hydration on insertion at baseline for each pair using questionnaire and rated on subjective response scale. (0-10; 0= very dehydrated, not hydrophilic, very dry, 10=very hydrated, ultra hydrophilic)
Baseline
Hydration (Subjective Assessment)
Subjective Assessment: Initial Hydration, Hydration During Day, Hydration Prior to Removal for each pair using questionnaire and rated on subjective response scale. (0-10; 0= very dehydrated, not hydrophilic, very dry, 10=very hydrated, ultra hydrophilic)
1 Week
Vision Quality (Subjective Assessment)
Subjective Assessment: Visual quality on insertion at baseline for each pair using questionnaire and rated on subjective response scale (0-10; 0= clear vision, 10=perfectly sharp)
Baseline
Vision Satisfaction (Subjective Assessment)
Subjective Assessment: Vision Satisfaction for each pair using questionnaire and rated on subjective response scale. (0-10; 0= very unsatisfied, 10=very satisfied)
1 Week
Dryness (Subjective Assessment)
Subjective Assessment: Dryness During Day, Dryness Prior to Removal, Overall Dryness for each pair using questionnaire and rated on subjective response scale. (0-10; 0= very dry, 10=no dryness)
1 Week
Handling (Subjective Assessment)
Subjective Assessment: Handling on Insertion and Removal, Overall Handling for each pair using questionnaire and rated on subjective response scale. (0-10; 0= very difficult, 10=very easy)
1 Week
Eye Whiteness/Redness (Subjective Assessment)
Subjective Assessment: Eye Whiteness/Redness for each pair using questionnaire and rated on subjective response scale. (0-10; 0= significant redness, 10=totally white)
1 Week
Overall Sensation of Smoothness (Subjective Assessment)
Subjective Assessment: Overall sensation of smoothness at 1 week wear for each pair when asked "How would you rate the overall sensation of smoothness (deposit resistance) of the first study lenses, over the last week of wear?" (Likert 1-5; 1=excellent, 2=good, 3=average, 4=below average, 5=poor)
1 Week
Overall Satisfaction for Lens
Subjective Assessment: Satisfaction overall at 1 Week wear for each pair when asked "Overall, how satisfied was the subject with the study lenses, during the last week, with regards to: Overall?" (Likert 1-4; 1=completely satisfied, 2=somewhat satisfied, 3=somewhat dissatisfied, 4=completely dissatisfied)
1 Week
Study Arms (2)
omafilcon A
ACTIVE COMPARATORStudy participants are randomized to wear omafilcon A lenses.
etafilcon A
ACTIVE COMPARATORStudy participants are randomized to wear etafilcon A lenses.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Is between 18 and 40 years of age (inclusive)
- Have the use of a mobile phone to send and receive text messages throughout the day for the duration of the study.
- Has had a self-reported visual exam in the last two years
- Is an adapted soft CL (Contact Lens) wearer
- Must be able to wear their lenses at least 6 full days over the 7 days; 14 hours per day, assuming there are no contraindications for doing so
- Has a CL spherical prescription between - 1.00 and - 6.00 (inclusive)
- Has less than 0.75D (Diopters) spectacle cylinder in each eye.
- Is correctable to a visual acuity of 20/25 or better in both eyes
- Has clear corneas and no active ocular disease
- Has read, understood and signed the information consent letter.
- Is willing to comply with the wear schedule (at least 40 hrs per week)
- Is willing to comply with the visit schedule
You may not qualify if:
- A person will be excluded from the study if he/she:
- Has never worn contact lenses before.
- Currently wears rigid gas permeable contact lenses.
- Has a history of not achieving comfortable CL wear (5 days per week; \> 8 hours/day)
- Has a CL prescription outside the range of - 1.00 to -6.00D
- Has a spectacle cylinder greater than -0.50D of cylinder in either eye.
- Has best corrected spectacle distance vision worse then 20/25 in either eye.
- Has any systemic disease affecting ocular health.
- Is using any systemic or topical medications that will affect ocular health.
- Has any ocular pathology or severe insufficiency of lacrimal secretion
- Has persistent, clinically significant corneal or conjunctival staining
- Has active neovascularization or any central corneal scars.
- Is aphakic.
- Is presbyopic.
- Has undergone corneal refractive surgery.
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
Phoenix Eye Care, PLLC
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032, United States
Lake Zurich Eye Care
Lake Zurich, Illinois, 60047, United States
Drs. Quinn, Foster & Assoc.
Athens, Ohio, 45701, United States
Vision Professionals
New Albany, Ohio, 43054, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Manager Global Medical/Scientific Affairs
- Organization
- CooperVision, Inc.
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Donald Siegel, OD
Sun City West Eye Care
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 27, 2013
First Posted
December 31, 2013
Study Start
January 1, 2014
Primary Completion
January 1, 2014
Study Completion
March 1, 2014
Last Updated
July 30, 2020
Results First Posted
April 20, 2016
Record last verified: 2020-07