NCT01809834

Brief Summary

Evaluation of two contact lenses

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
46

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2012

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2012

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

January 17, 2013

Completed
15 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2013

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 13, 2013

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2013

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 27, 2014

Completed
Last Updated

July 28, 2020

Status Verified

July 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

January 17, 2013

Results QC Date

March 24, 2014

Last Update Submit

July 19, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Participant's Subjective Rating of Comfort (Questionnaire)

    Participants rated their comfort of lenses by subjective questionnaire (un-annotated scale, 0-100, 0=Poor comfort/intolerable, 100=Excellent comfort/cannot be felt) Change over time measured at insertion, After settling, 12-hours, 1-week

    Insertion, After Lens settling, 12-hours, 1-week

  • Participant's Subjective Rating of Dryness (Questionnaire)

    Participants rated dryness of the lenses by subjective questionnaire (annotated scale, 0-100, 0=cannot be worn / extremely dry, 100=no dryness experienced at any time) Change over time measured at 12-hours, 1-week

    12-hours, 1-week

  • Participant's Subjective Rating of Lens Handling for Insertion (Questionnaire)

    Participants rated their lens handling experience for lens insertion by questionnaire (un-annotated scale, 0-100, 0=could not place lens on eye, 100=always easy to place lens on eye) Measured at Dispensing

    Dispense

  • Participant's Subjective Rating of Lens Handling for Removal (Questionnaire)

    Participants rated their lens handling experience for the lens removal by questionnaire (un-annotated scale, 0-100, 0=could not remove lens from eye, 100=always easy to remove lens from eye) Change over time measured at 12-hours, 1-week

    12-hours, 1-week

  • Participant's Subjective Rating of Visual Quality (Questionnaire)

    Participants rated visual quality of the lenses by questionnaire (annotated scale, 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. Cannot function, 100=excellent vision all of the time) Change over time measured at 12-hours, 1-week

    12-hours, 1-week

  • Participant's Subjective Rating of Overall Preference (Questionnaire)

    Participants rated their overall lens preference by questionnaire. (annotated scale, 0-100, scale normalized to 0=no preference, +50=strongly prefers test lens, -50=strongly prefers control lens). Change over time measured at 12-hours, 1-week

    12-hours, 1-week

Secondary Outcomes (6)

  • Investigator's Objective Assessment of Lens Surface Wettability (Biomicroscopy)

    Insertion, 12 hours, 1 week

  • Investigator's Objective Assessment of Overall Fit Acceptance (Biomicroscopy)

    Insertion, 12 hours, 1 week

  • Investigator's Objective Assessment of Visual Acuity, High Contrast at High Illumination (Snellen)

    Insertion

  • Investigator's Objective Assessment of Visual Acuity, High Contrast at Low Illumination (Snellen)

    Insertion, 12-hours, 1-week

  • Investigator's Objective Assessment of Anterior Ocular Physiological Response, Cornea (Biomicroscopy)

    Baseline, 12-hours, 1-week

  • +1 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Etafilcon A

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Each participant was randomized to wear the test lens in one eye and the control lens in the other simultaneously

Device: Stenfilcon A

Stenfilcon A

EXPERIMENTAL

Each participant was randomized to wear the test lens in one eye and the control lens in the other simultaneously

Device: Etafilcon A

Interventions

Stenfilcon A
Etafilcon A

Eligibility Criteria

Age17 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Is at least 17 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer;
  • Has read and signed an information consent letter;
  • Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule;
  • Is correctable to a visual acuity of 20/30 or better (in each eye) with their habitual correction and the assigned study lenses;
  • Has astigmatism less than or equal to -1.00D;
  • Is an adapted soft contact lens wearer;
  • Demonstrates an acceptable fit with the study lenses;
  • Has no active anterior segment disease or known ocular disease.

You may not qualify if:

  • A person will be excluded from the study if he/she:
  • Has never worn contact lenses before;
  • Has any systemic disease affecting ocular health;
  • Is using any systemic or topical medications that will affect ocular health;
  • Has any ocular pathology or severe insufficiency of lacrimal secretion (moderate to severe dry eyes) that would affect the wearing of contact lenses;
  • Has persistent, clinically significant corneal or conjunctival staining using sodium fluorescein dye;
  • Has any clinically significant lid or conjunctival abnormalities, neovascularization, corneal scars or corneal opacities;
  • Is aphakic;
  • Has undergone corneal refractive surgery;
  • Is participating in any other type of clinical or research study;
  • Has known sensitivity to the diagnostic pharmaceuticals to be used in the study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Center for Contact Lens Research, University of Waterloo

Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Myopia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Refractive ErrorsEye Diseases

Limitations and Caveats

One participant temporarily discontinued after 12-hour visit. (Primary outcome 1 and 4,1-week visit, n=43)

Results Point of Contact

Title
Lyndon Jones, PhD, FCO
Organization
School of Optometry, University of Waterloo

Study Officials

  • Lyndon Jones, PhD., FCO

    Univeristy of Waterloo, Canada

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
LTE60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

January 17, 2013

First Posted

March 13, 2013

Study Start

November 1, 2012

Primary Completion

February 1, 2013

Study Completion

November 1, 2013

Last Updated

July 28, 2020

Results First Posted

June 27, 2014

Record last verified: 2020-07

Locations