Evaluation of Stenfilcon A Versus Etafilcon A
1 other identifier
interventional
46
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Evaluation of two contact lenses
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2012
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2012
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 17, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 13, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 27, 2014
CompletedJuly 28, 2020
July 1, 2020
3 months
January 17, 2013
March 24, 2014
July 19, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (6)
Participant's Subjective Rating of Comfort (Questionnaire)
Participants rated their comfort of lenses by subjective questionnaire (un-annotated scale, 0-100, 0=Poor comfort/intolerable, 100=Excellent comfort/cannot be felt) Change over time measured at insertion, After settling, 12-hours, 1-week
Insertion, After Lens settling, 12-hours, 1-week
Participant's Subjective Rating of Dryness (Questionnaire)
Participants rated dryness of the lenses by subjective questionnaire (annotated scale, 0-100, 0=cannot be worn / extremely dry, 100=no dryness experienced at any time) Change over time measured at 12-hours, 1-week
12-hours, 1-week
Participant's Subjective Rating of Lens Handling for Insertion (Questionnaire)
Participants rated their lens handling experience for lens insertion by questionnaire (un-annotated scale, 0-100, 0=could not place lens on eye, 100=always easy to place lens on eye) Measured at Dispensing
Dispense
Participant's Subjective Rating of Lens Handling for Removal (Questionnaire)
Participants rated their lens handling experience for the lens removal by questionnaire (un-annotated scale, 0-100, 0=could not remove lens from eye, 100=always easy to remove lens from eye) Change over time measured at 12-hours, 1-week
12-hours, 1-week
Participant's Subjective Rating of Visual Quality (Questionnaire)
Participants rated visual quality of the lenses by questionnaire (annotated scale, 0-100, 0=extremely poor vision all of the time. Cannot function, 100=excellent vision all of the time) Change over time measured at 12-hours, 1-week
12-hours, 1-week
Participant's Subjective Rating of Overall Preference (Questionnaire)
Participants rated their overall lens preference by questionnaire. (annotated scale, 0-100, scale normalized to 0=no preference, +50=strongly prefers test lens, -50=strongly prefers control lens). Change over time measured at 12-hours, 1-week
12-hours, 1-week
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Investigator's Objective Assessment of Lens Surface Wettability (Biomicroscopy)
Insertion, 12 hours, 1 week
Investigator's Objective Assessment of Overall Fit Acceptance (Biomicroscopy)
Insertion, 12 hours, 1 week
Investigator's Objective Assessment of Visual Acuity, High Contrast at High Illumination (Snellen)
Insertion
Investigator's Objective Assessment of Visual Acuity, High Contrast at Low Illumination (Snellen)
Insertion, 12-hours, 1-week
Investigator's Objective Assessment of Anterior Ocular Physiological Response, Cornea (Biomicroscopy)
Baseline, 12-hours, 1-week
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Etafilcon A
ACTIVE COMPARATOREach participant was randomized to wear the test lens in one eye and the control lens in the other simultaneously
Stenfilcon A
EXPERIMENTALEach participant was randomized to wear the test lens in one eye and the control lens in the other simultaneously
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Is at least 17 years of age and has full legal capacity to volunteer;
- Has read and signed an information consent letter;
- Is willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule;
- Is correctable to a visual acuity of 20/30 or better (in each eye) with their habitual correction and the assigned study lenses;
- Has astigmatism less than or equal to -1.00D;
- Is an adapted soft contact lens wearer;
- Demonstrates an acceptable fit with the study lenses;
- Has no active anterior segment disease or known ocular disease.
You may not qualify if:
- A person will be excluded from the study if he/she:
- Has never worn contact lenses before;
- Has any systemic disease affecting ocular health;
- Is using any systemic or topical medications that will affect ocular health;
- Has any ocular pathology or severe insufficiency of lacrimal secretion (moderate to severe dry eyes) that would affect the wearing of contact lenses;
- Has persistent, clinically significant corneal or conjunctival staining using sodium fluorescein dye;
- Has any clinically significant lid or conjunctival abnormalities, neovascularization, corneal scars or corneal opacities;
- Is aphakic;
- Has undergone corneal refractive surgery;
- Is participating in any other type of clinical or research study;
- Has known sensitivity to the diagnostic pharmaceuticals to be used in the study.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Center for Contact Lens Research, University of Waterloo
Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3G1, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
One participant temporarily discontinued after 12-hour visit. (Primary outcome 1 and 4,1-week visit, n=43)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Lyndon Jones, PhD, FCO
- Organization
- School of Optometry, University of Waterloo
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Lyndon Jones, PhD., FCO
Univeristy of Waterloo, Canada
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- LTE60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 17, 2013
First Posted
March 13, 2013
Study Start
November 1, 2012
Primary Completion
February 1, 2013
Study Completion
November 1, 2013
Last Updated
July 28, 2020
Results First Posted
June 27, 2014
Record last verified: 2020-07