Focused Cardiac and Lung Ultrasound in Anesthesia/Critical Care - The Role of Self-directed Simulation-assisted Training Compared to a Traditional Supervised Approach
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine whether a self-directed and simulation-based lung ultrasound (LUS) and focused cardiac ultrasound (FCU) curriculum is efficacious on anesthesia trainees' image acquisition skills and diagnostic acumen. The investigators hypothesize that a self-directed and ultrasound-assisted LUS and FCU curriculum that includes video lectures, online teaching modules, an ultrasound simulator, and self-directed hands-on sessions on critically ill mechanically ventilated patients is effective in training novice ultrasonographers to obtain good quality images, to correctly interpret them, and to support clinical decision-making in critically ill patients. Trainees will be randomized to fully supervised FCU hands-on sessions on healthy models and critically ill mechanically ventilated patients (control group - traditional apprenticeship model) or to a completely self-directed and simulation-based approach (intervention group). To assess if this new self-directed and simulation-based ultrasound curriculum leads to adequate acquisition of competences (adequate image acquisition and interpretation) in novice ultrasonographers, trainees will have to perform a focused lung and cardiac assessment on a critically ill mechanically ventilated patient.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2014
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 24, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
October 30, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2018
CompletedDecember 6, 2016
December 1, 2016
3.6 years
October 24, 2013
December 5, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Difference between pre- and post-intervention image acquisition and interpretation skill (as compared to the benchmark exam).
The quality of the images will be scored from 1 (worst) to 5 (best). The score will be based on the assessment of the quality of the image as well as an assessment of relevant cardiac structures included in each view. Difference between pre- and post-intervention image acquisition skills and knowledge as measured by: * Scanning time (total and per view) * Anatomy recognition * Items completion (%) * Image interpretation (Y/N for lung sliding, interstitial syndrome, pleural effusion, consolidation, pericardial fluid, LV global function, RV global function, intravascular volume assessment; total and per objective accuracy) * MCQs results (%) (Indication \& Image interpretation assessment) * Video-interpretation of cases results (%) (Image interpretation \& Clinical decision-making assessment) * Qualitative and quantitative analysis of survey results (dichotomic questions; graded criteria; e.g.10-point Likert scale)
~4-5 months post-study enrolment, after completion of ultrasound training
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Differences between self-directed and simulation-assisted training and traditional apprenticeship training
~4-5 months post-study enrolment, after completion of ultrasound training
Other Outcomes (2)
Assessment of baseline visuo-spatial skill
~4-5 months post-study enrolment, after completion of ultrasound training
Knowledge and skills retention at 3 months
~4-5 months post-study enrolment, after completion of ultrasound training
Study Arms (2)
Self-directed and simulation-assisted training
EXPERIMENTALTraditional apprenticeship training
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
All participants will attend an ultrasound introductory course (lectures and illustrative interactive cases). Participants randomized to the intervention group will undergo a completely self-directed lung and focused cardiac ultrasound curriculum. * A set of video-lectures on how to perform US on a critically ill patient (video-tutorials on image acquisition, troubleshooting, and pitfalls) will be provided. * Participant will have access to an ultrasound simulator. * Finally, participants in the intervention group will be asked to perform self-directed lung and focused cardiac ultrasound examinations on critically ill patients. An investigator will supervise the sessions but will not interfere with the self-learning process. \- To support their learning, trainees will have access to on-line virtual FCU and LUS modules created by the Toronto General Hospital Department of Anesthesia Perioperative Interactive Education (http://pie.med.utoronto.ca/TTE/index.htm).
All participants will attend an half-day ultrasound introductory course. * Participants randomized to the conventional group will initially attend 2-hour hands-on session on healthy volunteers, fully supervised by an expert critical care ultrasonographer (acquisition of basic knowledge with US machine settings and probe positioning and orientation, normal view acquisition, and identification of normal anatomical structures and landmarks). * Subsequently, participants will attend a 3-hours hands-on session on critically ill patients, fully supervised by an expert critical care ultrasonographer.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- PGY1 and PGY2 anesthesia resident at the University of Toronto
You may not qualify if:
- Previous training in lung ultrasound or FCU
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
St. Michael's Hospital
Toronto, Ontario, M5B 1W8, Canada
Related Publications (8)
Royse CF, Canty DJ, Faris J, Haji DL, Veltman M, Royse A. Core review: physician-performed ultrasound: the time has come for routine use in acute care medicine. Anesth Analg. 2012 Nov;115(5):1007-28. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e31826a79c1. Epub 2012 Sep 25.
PMID: 23011559BACKGROUNDLabovitz AJ, Noble VE, Bierig M, Goldstein SA, Jones R, Kort S, Porter TR, Spencer KT, Tayal VS, Wei K. Focused cardiac ultrasound in the emergent setting: a consensus statement of the American Society of Echocardiography and American College of Emergency Physicians. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2010 Dec;23(12):1225-30. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2010.10.005.
PMID: 21111923BACKGROUNDSpencer KT, Kimura BJ, Korcarz CE, Pellikka PA, Rahko PS, Siegel RJ. Focused cardiac ultrasound: recommendations from the American Society of Echocardiography. J Am Soc Echocardiogr. 2013 Jun;26(6):567-81. doi: 10.1016/j.echo.2013.04.001. No abstract available.
PMID: 23711341BACKGROUNDExpert Round Table on Ultrasound in ICU. International expert statement on training standards for critical care ultrasonography. Intensive Care Med. 2011 Jul;37(7):1077-83. doi: 10.1007/s00134-011-2246-9. Epub 2011 May 26.
PMID: 21614639BACKGROUNDMayo PH, Beaulieu Y, Doelken P, Feller-Kopman D, Harrod C, Kaplan A, Oropello J, Vieillard-Baron A, Axler O, Lichtenstein D, Maury E, Slama M, Vignon P. American College of Chest Physicians/La Societe de Reanimation de Langue Francaise statement on competence in critical care ultrasonography. Chest. 2009 Apr;135(4):1050-1060. doi: 10.1378/chest.08-2305. Epub 2009 Feb 2.
PMID: 19188546BACKGROUNDVolpicelli G, Elbarbary M, Blaivas M, Lichtenstein DA, Mathis G, Kirkpatrick AW, Melniker L, Gargani L, Noble VE, Via G, Dean A, Tsung JW, Soldati G, Copetti R, Bouhemad B, Reissig A, Agricola E, Rouby JJ, Arbelot C, Liteplo A, Sargsyan A, Silva F, Hoppmann R, Breitkreutz R, Seibel A, Neri L, Storti E, Petrovic T; International Liaison Committee on Lung Ultrasound (ILC-LUS) for International Consensus Conference on Lung Ultrasound (ICC-LUS). International evidence-based recommendations for point-of-care lung ultrasound. Intensive Care Med. 2012 Apr;38(4):577-91. doi: 10.1007/s00134-012-2513-4. Epub 2012 Mar 6.
PMID: 22392031BACKGROUNDSchmidt GA. ICU ultrasound. The coming boom. Chest. 2009 Jun;135(6):1407-1408. doi: 10.1378/chest.09-0502. No abstract available.
PMID: 19497889BACKGROUNDNeelankavil J, Howard-Quijano K, Hsieh TC, Ramsingh D, Scovotti JC, Chua JH, Ho JK, Mahajan A. Transthoracic echocardiography simulation is an efficient method to train anesthesiologists in basic transthoracic echocardiography skills. Anesth Analg. 2012 Nov;115(5):1042-51. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e318265408f. Epub 2012 Jul 19.
PMID: 22822190BACKGROUND
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Simon Abrahamson, MD
Unity Health Toronto
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Han Kim, MD
Unity Health Toronto
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Alberto Goffi, MD
University Health Network, Toronto
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 24, 2013
First Posted
October 30, 2013
Study Start
November 1, 2014
Primary Completion
June 1, 2018
Study Completion
June 1, 2018
Last Updated
December 6, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-12