NCT02754310

Brief Summary

Repeated exposure to simulated cases has been shown to improve performance, but repeating the same scenario may impair the ability of learners to transfer their knowledge and skills to slightly different situations. The objective of this study is to compare the use of repeated versus varied simulation cases for teaching the management of pediatric asthma exacerbation to 3rd year medical students.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
85

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2016

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 26, 2016

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 28, 2016

Completed
3 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2016

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

October 1, 2016

Completed
2.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 28, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

June 28, 2019

Status Verified

March 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

April 26, 2016

Results QC Date

December 16, 2017

Last Update Submit

March 9, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

Education, medicalSimulation Training

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Management Score on Transfer Scenario n°1

    The transfer scenario n°1 is a new scenario that learners face for the first time. It is a pediatric asthma exacerbation rapidly worsening. The scale "Asthma exacerbation rapidly worsening" includes different items related to the sequence, the dose, and the administration technique of the treatments. The score ranges between 0 and 10, 10 meaning perfect management of the medical condition. The detailed scale can be found in the supplementary material of the article published here: https://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s00431-017-3054-1.

    One week

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Management Score on Transfer Scenario n°2

    One week

  • Management Score on Evaluation Scenario n°1

    One week

  • Management Score on Evaluation Scenario n°2

    One week

  • Management Score on Transfer Scenario n°3

    4 months

  • Management Score on Transfer Scenario n°4

    4 months

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Repeated scenarios

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants in the repeated scenario group will learn the management of a pediatric asthma exacerbation on the same scenario repeated three times. The scenario is a pediatric moderate asthma exacerbation not responding to treatment, .

Other: Repeated scenarios

Varied scenarios

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants in the varied scenarios group will learn the management of a pediatric asthma exacerbation on three different scenarios: a moderate asthma exacerbation, a mild one, and a severe one, for the same length of time than the "repeated scenarios" group. In this group, there is a variation of scenarios.

Other: Variation of scenarios

Interventions

Three different scenarios of pediatric asthma exacerbations: a mild exacerbation, a moderate exacerbation, and a severe exacerbation.

Varied scenarios

The same scenario of a moderate pediatric asthma exacerbation is repeated three times.

Repeated scenarios

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Third year medical students from Paris Descartes and Paris Diderot medical faculties.
  • Who are not opposed to participated in the study

You may not qualify if:

  • Opposition to participate in the study

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Département de Simulation iLumens, Université Paris Descartes

Paris, 75006, France

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Tofil NM, Peterson DT, Wheeler JT, Youngblood A, Zinkan JL, Lara D, Jakaitis B, Niebauer J, White ML. Repeated versus varied case selection in pediatric resident simulation. J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Jun;6(2):275-9. doi: 10.4300/JGME-D-13-00099.1.

    PMID: 24949131BACKGROUND
  • Cook DA, Hamstra SJ, Brydges R, Zendejas B, Szostek JH, Wang AT, Erwin PJ, Hatala R. Comparative effectiveness of instructional design features in simulation-based education: systematic review and meta-analysis. Med Teach. 2013;35(1):e867-98. doi: 10.3109/0142159X.2012.714886. Epub 2012 Sep 3.

    PMID: 22938677BACKGROUND

Related Links

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr David Drummond
Organization
iLumens

Study Officials

  • David Drummond, MD

    University Paris René Descartes

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Dr David Drummond

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 26, 2016

First Posted

April 28, 2016

Study Start

May 1, 2016

Primary Completion

May 1, 2016

Study Completion

October 1, 2016

Last Updated

June 28, 2019

Results First Posted

June 28, 2019

Record last verified: 2019-03

Locations