Evaluating the Burst Pressure of Simulated Bowel Anastomosis Constructed Using the Reverse Half-Hitch Alternating Post Knots
1 other identifier
interventional
20
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Square knots are the gold standard for hand-tied surgical knots; however, they are difficult to reproduce in deep body cavities and can inadvertently result in slipped knots. The investigators have shown in previous work that the reversing half-hitch alternating post (RHAP) surgical knot is a non-inferior alternative to the square surgical knot based on its tensile strength and performance in limited working spaces. Prior to introducing RHAP knot in routine surgical practice, it is important to objectively demonstrate similar physical characteristics of anastomosis created using RHAP and standard square knots. This study aims to compare the burst pressure of cadaveric porcine small bowel anastomosis constructed using RHAP and standard square knots on a flat surface and in a simulated deep body cavity. The investigators are conducting a prospective randomized controlled study of novice medical students allocated to proficiency-based training in RHAP and square surgical knots. Knot tying proficiency will be assessed using a knot-tying checklist. Number of repetitions and time required to achieve proficiency will be tracked for each group. Once proficiency has been achieved by participants in RHAP and square knots group, each participant will perform two-hand sewn small bowel anastomosis using cadaveric porcine small bowel. One anastomosis will be performed on a flat surface and the other will be formed in a simulated deep body cavity. Burst pressure of the anastomoses will be tested using a column of water, and results will be compared between groups. Simple descriptive statistics will be performed for both groups. Between group comparisons of knot-tying proficiency and burst pressure will be performed using t-test. Learning curves within each group will be analyzed using paired 1-way ANOVA. SPSS Statistics (v. 21, IBM, New York, USA) will be used for all statistical analysis, with significance set to p\<0.05. The investigators hypothesize that burst pressure of cadaveric porcine small bowel anastomosis will be equivalent for anastomosis constructed using RHAP and standard square knots. The results of this study will provide further validity evidence in support of RHAP as suitable alternative to the square surgical knots.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2018
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2018
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
October 12, 2018
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 15, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2018
CompletedFebruary 11, 2019
February 1, 2019
5 months
October 12, 2018
February 8, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Burst pressure (mm Hg) of repaired enterotomies
Once the enterotomy in the porcine small bowel has been repaired by participants with knots according to the randomized intervention arm, blinded evaluators will tie off one end of the bowel and fill the other end with normal saline. Pressure will be applied the bag of normal saline and the pressure at which the repaired enterotomy leaks will be recorded. The pressure will be recorded in mm Hg.
One session ~2-4 hours
Study Arms (2)
Square Knot
ACTIVE COMPARATORReversing Half-Hitch Alternating Post Knot
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Undergraduate first or second year medical/non-medical student
You may not qualify if:
- Third year or greater undergraduate medical student
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Queen's Unviersity
Kingston, Ontario, K7L 3N6, Canada
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
October 12, 2018
First Posted
November 15, 2018
Study Start
August 1, 2018
Primary Completion
December 30, 2018
Study Completion
December 30, 2018
Last Updated
February 11, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-02
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share