Goal Achievement After Utilizing an Anti-PCSK9 Antibody in Statin Intolerant Subjects -2
GAUSS-2
A Double-blind, Randomized, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Safety and Efficacy of AMG 145, Compared With Ezetimibe, in Hypercholesterolemic Subjects Unable to Tolerate an Effective Dose of a HMG-CoA Reductase Inhibitor
2 other identifiers
interventional
307
14 countries
58
Brief Summary
The primary objective was to evaluate the effect of 12 weeks of subcutaneous (SC) evolocumab every 2 weeks (Q2W) and monthly (QM), compared with ezetimibe, on percent change from baseline in low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) in hypercholesterolemic adults unable to tolerate an effective dose of a statin (HMG-CoA (5-hydroxy-3-methylglutaryl-coenzyme A) reductase inhibitors).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Jan 2013
Shorter than P25 for phase_3
58 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 7, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
January 9, 2013
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 24, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 19, 2013
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 19, 2013
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 22, 2015
CompletedJuly 20, 2020
July 1, 2020
10 months
January 7, 2013
September 2, 2015
July 1, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 12
Baseline and Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in LDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12
Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12
Secondary Outcomes (20)
Change From Baseline in LDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12
Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12
Change From Baseline in LDL-C at Week 12
Baseline and Week 12
Percentage of Participants With Mean LDL-C at Weeks 10 and 12 of Less Than 70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L)
Weeks 10 and 12
Percentage of Participants With LDL-C < 70 mg/dL (1.8 mmol/L) at Week 12
Week 12
Percent Change From Baseline in Non-HDL-C at the Mean of Weeks 10 and 12
Baseline and Weeks 10 and 12
- +15 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (4)
Ezetimibe (Q2W)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants received placebo subcutaneous injection once every 2 weeks and 10 mg ezetimibe orally once a day for up to 12 weeks.
Ezetimibe (QM)
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants received placebo subcutaneous injection once a month and 10 mg ezetimibe orally once a day for up to 12 weeks.
Evolocumab Q2W
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received 140 mg evolocumab by subcutaneous injection once every 2 weeks and placebo tablets once a day for up to 12 weeks.
Evolocumab QM
EXPERIMENTALParticipants received 420 mg evolocumab by subcutaneous injection once a month and placebo tablets once a day for up to 12 weeks.
Interventions
Subcutaneous injection
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Male or female ≥ 18 to ≤ 80 years of age
- Not on a statin or on a low dose statin with stable dose for at least 4 weeks
- History of intolerance to at least 2 statins
- Subject not at LDL-C goal
- Lipid lowering therapy has been stable prior to enrolment for at least 4 weeks.
- Fasting triglycerides ≤ 400 mg/dL
You may not qualify if:
- New York Heart Association (NYHA) III or IV heart failure
- Uncontrolled cardiac arrhythmia
- Uncontrolled hypertension
- Type 1 diabetes, poorly controlled type 2 diabetes
- Uncontrolled hypothyroidism or hyperthyroidism
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Amgenlead
Study Sites (58)
Research Site
Carmichael, California, 95608, United States
Research Site
Los Angeles, California, 90048, United States
Research Site
Mission Viejo, California, 92691, United States
Research Site
Thousand Oaks, California, 91360, United States
Research Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30338, United States
Research Site
Atlanta, Georgia, 30342, United States
Research Site
Savannah, Georgia, 31406, United States
Research Site
Auburn, Maine, 04210, United States
Research Site
Traverse City, Michigan, 49684, United States
Research Site
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Research Site
Henderson, Nevada, 89052, United States
Research Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89117, United States
Research Site
Las Vegas, Nevada, 89148, United States
Research Site
New York, New York, 10029, United States
Research Site
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27609, United States
Research Site
Akron, Ohio, 44311, United States
Research Site
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45212, United States
Research Site
Cleveland, Ohio, 44195, United States
Research Site
Norman, Oklahoma, 73069, United States
Research Site
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Research Site
Camperdown, New South Wales, 2015, Australia
Research Site
Milton, Queensland, 4064, Australia
Research Site
Melbourne, Victoria, 3004, Australia
Research Site
Perth, Western Australia, 6000, Australia
Research Site
Brussels, 1200, Belgium
Research Site
Ghent, 9000, Belgium
Research Site
La Louvière, 7100, Belgium
Research Site
Newmarket, Ontario, L3Y 5G8, Canada
Research Site
Lachine, Quebec, H8S 2E4, Canada
Research Site
Pointe-Claire, Quebec, H9R 3J1, Canada
Research Site
Aalborg, 9000, Denmark
Research Site
Ballerup Municipality, 2750, Denmark
Research Site
Vejle, 7100, Denmark
Research Site
Lille, 59037, France
Research Site
Paris, 75651, France
Research Site
Vénissieux, 69200, France
Research Site
Bad Krozingen, 79189, Germany
Research Site
Dresden, 01307, Germany
Research Site
Heppenheim an der Bergstrasse, 64646, Germany
Research Site
Hong Kong, Hong Kong
Research Site
New Territories, Hong Kong
Research Site
Alkmaar, 1815 JD, Netherlands
Research Site
Amsterdam, 1105 AZ, Netherlands
Research Site
Groningen, 9713 GZ, Netherlands
Research Site
Lodz, 90-368, Poland
Research Site
Warsaw, 04-730, Poland
Research Site
Midrand, Gauteng, 1685, South Africa
Research Site
Observatory, Western Cape, 7925, South Africa
Research Site
Somerset West, Western Cape, 7130, South Africa
Research Site
Córdoba, Andalusia, 14004, Spain
Research Site
Zaragoza, Aragon, 50009, Spain
Research Site
Reus, Catalonia, 43204, Spain
Research Site
Lugano, 6900, Switzerland
Research Site
Reinach, 4153, Switzerland
Research Site
Liverpool, L22 0LG, United Kingdom
Research Site
London, NW3 2QG, United Kingdom
Research Site
Telford, TF1 6TF, United Kingdom
Research Site
West Bromwich, B71 4HJ, United Kingdom
Related Publications (11)
Toth PP, Descamps O, Genest J, Sattar N, Preiss D, Dent R, Djedjos C, Wu Y, Geller M, Uhart M, Somaratne R, Wasserman SM; PROFICIO Investigators. Pooled Safety Analysis of Evolocumab in Over 6000 Patients From Double-Blind and Open-Label Extension Studies. Circulation. 2017 May 9;135(19):1819-1831. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.116.025233. Epub 2017 Mar 1.
PMID: 28249876BACKGROUNDKuchimanchi M, Grover A, Emery MG, Somaratne R, Wasserman SM, Gibbs JP, Doshi S. Population pharmacokinetics and exposure-response modeling and simulation for evolocumab in healthy volunteers and patients with hypercholesterolemia. J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn. 2018 Jun;45(3):505-522. doi: 10.1007/s10928-018-9592-y. Epub 2018 May 7.
PMID: 29736889BACKGROUNDCho L, Dent R, Stroes ESG, Stein EA, Sullivan D, Ruzza A, Flower A, Somaratne R, Rosenson RS. Persistent Safety and Efficacy of Evolocumab in Patients with Statin Intolerance: a Subset Analysis of the OSLER Open-Label Extension Studies. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2018 Aug;32(4):365-372. doi: 10.1007/s10557-018-6817-7.
PMID: 30073585BACKGROUNDKasichayanula S, Grover A, Emery MG, Gibbs MA, Somaratne R, Wasserman SM, Gibbs JP. Clinical Pharmacokinetics and Pharmacodynamics of Evolocumab, a PCSK9 Inhibitor. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2018 Jul;57(7):769-779. doi: 10.1007/s40262-017-0620-7.
PMID: 29353350BACKGROUNDWasserman SM, Sabatine MS, Koren MJ, Giugliano RP, Legg JC, Emery MG, Doshi S, Liu T, Somaratne R, Gibbs JP. Comparison of LDL-C Reduction Using Different Evolocumab Doses and Intervals: Biological Insights and Treatment Implications. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2018 Sep;23(5):423-432. doi: 10.1177/1074248418774043. Epub 2018 May 16.
PMID: 29768954BACKGROUNDCho L, Rocco M, Colquhoun D, Sullivan D, Rosenson RS, Dent R, Xue A, Scott R, Wasserman SM, Stroes E. Design and rationale of the GAUSS-2 study trial: a double-blind, ezetimibe-controlled phase 3 study of the efficacy and tolerability of evolocumab (AMG 145) in subjects with hypercholesterolemia who are intolerant of statin therapy. Clin Cardiol. 2014 Mar;37(3):131-9. doi: 10.1002/clc.22248. Epub 2014 Jan 29.
PMID: 24477778BACKGROUNDStroes E, Colquhoun D, Sullivan D, Civeira F, Rosenson RS, Watts GF, Bruckert E, Cho L, Dent R, Knusel B, Xue A, Scott R, Wasserman SM, Rocco M; GAUSS-2 Investigators. Anti-PCSK9 antibody effectively lowers cholesterol in patients with statin intolerance: the GAUSS-2 randomized, placebo-controlled phase 3 clinical trial of evolocumab. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2014 Jun 17;63(23):2541-2548. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2014.03.019. Epub 2014 Mar 30.
PMID: 24694531BACKGROUNDShapiro MD, Minnier J, Tavori H, Kassahun H, Flower A, Somaratne R, Fazio S. Relationship Between Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol and Lipoprotein(a) Lowering in Response to PCSK9 Inhibition With Evolocumab. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019 Feb 19;8(4):e010932. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010932.
PMID: 30755061BACKGROUNDStroes E, Robinson JG, Raal FJ, Dufour R, Sullivan D, Kassahun H, Ma Y, Wasserman SM, Koren MJ. Consistent LDL-C response with evolocumab among patient subgroups in PROFICIO: A pooled analysis of 3146 patients from phase 3 studies. Clin Cardiol. 2018 Oct;41(10):1328-1335. doi: 10.1002/clc.23049. Epub 2018 Oct 21.
PMID: 30120772BACKGROUNDToth PP, Jones SR, Monsalvo ML, Elliott-Davey M, Lopez JAG, Banach M. Effect of Evolocumab on Non-High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol, Apolipoprotein B, and Lipoprotein(a): A Pooled Analysis of Phase 2 and Phase 3 Studies. J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Mar 3;9(5):e014129. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.014129. Epub 2020 Mar 2.
PMID: 32114889BACKGROUNDKoren MJ, Jones PH, Robinson JG, Sullivan D, Cho L, Hucko T, Lopez JAG, Fleishman AN, Somaratne R, Stroes E. A Comparison of Ezetimibe and Evolocumab for Atherogenic Lipid Reduction in Four Patient Populations: A Pooled Efficacy and Safety Analysis of Three Phase 3 Studies. Cardiol Ther. 2020 Dec;9(2):447-465. doi: 10.1007/s40119-020-00181-8. Epub 2020 Jun 20.
PMID: 32564340BACKGROUND
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Amgen Inc.
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
MD
Amgen
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 7, 2013
First Posted
January 9, 2013
Study Start
January 24, 2013
Primary Completion
November 19, 2013
Study Completion
November 19, 2013
Last Updated
July 20, 2020
Results First Posted
December 22, 2015
Record last verified: 2020-07