NCT01763047

Brief Summary

The objective of this study is to evaluate the performance of a novel multifocal lens system.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
298

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2012

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

19 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2012

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 17, 2012

Completed
22 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

January 8, 2013

Completed
24 days until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2013

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2013

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

June 10, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

June 19, 2018

Status Verified

May 1, 2016

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

December 17, 2012

Results QC Date

March 1, 2016

Last Update Submit

June 18, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (6)

  • Binocular Distance Visual Acuity (LogMAR)

    Distance time controlled LogMAR Visual Acuity was carried out binocularly with high luminance and high contrast, at 4m under 250 cd/m\^2. The test was presented under the condition High luminance (250 cd/m\^2) High Contrast (90%)

    8-12 days post wear

  • Binocular Near Visual Acuity (logMAR)

    Near time controlled LogMAR Visual Acuity was carried out binocularly using High lumiance and High Contrast, at 40cm under 250 cd/m\^2. The test was presented under the condition High Luminance (250cd/m\^2) High Contrast (90%).

    8-12 days post wear

  • Percentage of Eyes With Corneal Staining Grade 3 or Higher

    Corneal staining was evaluated in 5 corneal regions (Central, Inferior, Nasal, Temporal and Superior) using Sodium Fluorescein strips. The Fluorescien strip was lightly placed on the subject's inferior palpebral conjunctiva. The corneal Staining was graded using the scale Grade 0: No Staining, Grade 1: Trace(Minimal superficial staining or stippling), Grade 2: Mild (Regional or diffuse punctate staining), Grade 3:Moderate(Significant dense coalesced staining, corneal abrasion or foreign body tracks.), Grade 4 Severe(Severe abrasions greater than 2 mm in diameter, ulcerations, epithelial loss, or full thickness abrasion.). The data was dichotomized into two group subjects with grade 3 or higher and those subjects with less than Grade 3 for the maximum grade of corneal staining across all 5 regions.

    8-12 days post wear

  • Percentage of Eyes With Limbal Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or Higher

    The Limbus refers to the 1 to 2mm wide zone of conjunctiva and underlying tissue adjacent to where the cornea joins the sclera. Limbal Conjuctival Redness was graded in 4 regions (Nasal, Temporal, Inferior and Superior) using the Efron Grading Scale in 1 unit increments. Grade 0: Normal, Grade 1: Trace, Grade 2: Mild, Grade 3: Moderate, Grade 4: Severe. The data was dichotomized into two group subjects with grade 3 or higher Limbal Conjuctival Redness, and those subjects with less than Grade 3 for the maximum grade of all 4 regions.

    8-12 days post wear

  • Percentage of Eyes With Bulbar Conjunctival Redness Grade 3 or Higher

    Bulbar Conjunctival Injection was assessed in 4 regions (Nasal, Temporal, Inferior and Superior) using an Efron Grading scale by 1 unit increments. Grade 0: Normal, Grade 1: Trace, Grade 2: Mild, Grade 3: Moderate, Grade 4:Severe. The data was dichotomized into two group subjects with grade 3 or higher Conjunctival injection, and those subjects with less than Grade 3 for the maximum grade of all 4 regions.

    8-12 days post wear

  • CLUE Overall Quality of Vision Using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE)TM Questionnaire

    CLUE Overall Quality of Vision is assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE)TM questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes questionnaire to assess patient experience attributes of soft, disposable contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Scores follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response. 97% of the scores fall within 0 and 120 (mean +/-3XSD).

    8-12 days post wear

Study Arms (2)

etafilcon A/lotrafilcon B

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects were randomized to one of two lens wear sequences. Subject randomized to this sequence first wore the etafilcon A lens and then wore the lotrafilcon B lens.

Device: etafilcon ADevice: lotrafilcon B

lotrafilcon B/etafilcon A

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects were randomized to one of two lens wear sequences. Subject randomized to this sequence first wore the lotrafilcon B lens and then wore the etafilcon A lens.

Device: etafilcon ADevice: lotrafilcon B

Interventions

To be worn in a daily wear modality for a minimum of 6 hours per day.

etafilcon A/lotrafilcon Blotrafilcon B/etafilcon A

Lenses will be worn in a reuseable modality; cleaned and disinfected each night.

Also known as: AirOptix Aqua Multifocal
etafilcon A/lotrafilcon Blotrafilcon B/etafilcon A

Eligibility Criteria

Age40 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects must read, understand, and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and receive a fully executed copy of the form.
  • Subjects must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in the clinical protocol.
  • Subjects must be between 40 and 70 years of age.
  • Subjects' spherical equivalent distance refraction must be in the range of -3.75 to +3.75 in each eye.
  • Subjects' refractive cylinder must be less than or equal to 0.75D in each eye.
  • Subjects' ADD power must be in the range of +0.75 to +2.50D in each eye.
  • Subjects' must have the best corrected visual acuity of 20/20-3 or better in each eye.
  • Subjects' should own a wearable pair of spectacles.
  • Subjects' must be an adapted soft contact lens wearer in both eyes (i.e. worn lenses a minimum of 2 days per week for at least 8 hours per wear day, for 1 month or more duration).
  • Subjects' must respond positively to at least on symptom on the "Presbyopis Symptoms Questionnaire" or already be wearing a presbyopic contact lens correction (e.g. reading spectacles over contact lenses, multifocal or monovision contact lenses, etc.).

You may not qualify if:

  • Currently pregnant or lactating (subjects who become pregnant during the study will be discontinued).
  • Any ocular or systemic allergies or diseases that may interfere with contact lens wear.
  • Any systemic disease, autoimmune disease, or use of medication, which may interfere with contact lens wear.
  • Any previous intraocular surgery (e.g. radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, etc.)
  • Any grade 3 or greater slit lamp findings (e.g. edema, corneal neovascularization, corneal staining, tarsal abnormalities, conjunctival injection) which may contraindicate contact lens wear.
  • Any ocular infection.
  • Any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid gas permeable contact lens wear.
  • History of binocular vision abnormality or strabismus.
  • Any infectious disease (e.g. hepatitis, tuberculosis) or contagious immunosuppressive disease (e.g. HIV).
  • History of diabetes.
  • Participation in any contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 7 days prior to study enrollment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (19)

Unknown Facility

Mission Viejo, California, United States

Location

RPS

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Saint Augustine, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tallahassee, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Winter Park, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Roswell, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lutherville, Maryland, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Closter, New Jersey, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New York, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Denver, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Athens, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Kingston, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Warwick, Rhode Island, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Memphis, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Amarillo, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tyler, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Salt Lake City, Utah, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Salem, Virginia, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Presbyopia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Refractive ErrorsEye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Thomas R. Karkkainen, OD., M.S., F.A.A.O- Senior Principal Research Optometrist
Organization
Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc.

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 17, 2012

First Posted

January 8, 2013

Study Start

November 1, 2012

Primary Completion

February 1, 2013

Study Completion

February 1, 2013

Last Updated

June 19, 2018

Results First Posted

June 10, 2016

Record last verified: 2016-05

Locations