Comparison of Three Soft Bifocal Contact Lenses
1 other identifier
interventional
37
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary purpose of the study is to compare the performance of three soft bifocal contact lenses in terms of the vision provided by the lenses.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2008
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2008
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2008
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 12, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 15, 2008
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 26, 2010
CompletedJune 19, 2018
August 1, 2017
1 month
December 12, 2008
July 30, 2010
June 18, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Distance Bright Illumination Binocular Visual Performance Reported as Visual Acuity
Tested with both eyes together in bright lighting, reading charts distant to the subject. This outcome is measured in logMAR units.LogMAR stands for the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution. Ideal is 0.0 and represents 20/20 Snellen acuity. logMAR values \> 0.00 indicate vision poorer than the ideal and values \<0.00 indicate vision greater than the ideal.
5 minutes after insertion
Near Bright Illumination Binocular Visual Performance Reported as Visual Acuity
Tested with both eyes together in bright lighting reading charts near to the subject. This outcome is measured in logMAR units.LogMAR stands for the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution. Ideal is 0.0 and represents 20/20 Snellen acuity. logMAR values \> 0.00 indicate vision poorer than the ideal and values \<0.00 indicate vision greater than the ideal.
5 minutes after insertion
Type of Corneal Staining
Investigator rated type of corneal staining as either 0=none, 1=micropunctate, 2=macropunctate, 3=coalesced, or 4=patch(\> or = to mm).
after 1 week of lens wear, for each lens type
Overall Subjective Vision
Subject rated the overall quality of vision with the study contact lenses. 5=excellent, 4=very good, 3=good, 2=fair, 1=poor.
after 1 week of lens wear, for each lens type
Study Arms (6)
senofilA test/senofilA prod/balafilconA
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects wear 3 multifocal contact lenses: senofilcon A test worn first, senofilcon A production worn second, and balafilcon A worn third.
senofilcon A test/balafilcon A/senofilcon A prod
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects wear 3 multifocal contact lenses: senofilcon A test worn first, balafilcon A worn second, and senofilcon A production worn third.
senofilcon A prod/senofilcon A test/balafilcon A
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects wear 3 multifocal contact lenses: senofilcon A production worn first, senofilcon A test worn second, and balafilcon A worn third.
senofilcon A prod/ balifilcon A/ senofilcon A test
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects wear 3 multifocal contact lenses: senofilcon A production worn first, balafilcon A worn second, and senofilcon A test worn third.
balafilcon A/senofilcon A test/senofilcon A prod
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects wear 3 multifocal contact lenses: balafilcon A worn first, senofilcon A test worn second, and senofilcon A production worn third.
balafilcon A/senofilcon A prod/senofilcon A test
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects wear 3 multifocal contact lenses: balafilcon A worn first, senofilcon A production worn second, senofilcon A test worn third.
Interventions
multifocal contact lens
multifocal contact lens
multifocal contact lens
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The subject must between 35 and 70 years of age.
- The subject must respond positively to at least one symptom on the "Presbyopic Symptoms Questionnaire" or be already wearing presbyopic contact lens correction ( e.g. reading spectacles over contact lenses, multifocal or monovision contact lenses etc.).
- The subject's spherical equivalent distance refraction must be in the range of -1.00 to -6.00 in each eye.
- Refractive cylinder must be less than or equal to -0.75 D in each eye.
- The subject must have an add power of +0.75D to +2.50D in each eye.
- The subject must have best corrected visual acuity of 20/20-3 or better in each eye.
- The subject's must have at least 20/30-distance vision with the study contact lenses.
- The subject must agree that they are comfortable with their vision prior to being dispensed the study lenses.
- The subject must be an adapted soft contact lens wearer in both eyes.
- The subject must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.
- The subject must read and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and be provided a copy of the form.
You may not qualify if:
- Ocular or systemic allergies or disease that may interfere with contact lens wear.
- Systemic disease, autoimmune disease or use of medication, which may interfere with contact lens wear.
- Clinically significant (grade 3 or 4) corneal edema, corneal vascularization, corneal staining or any other abnormality of the cornea, which may contraindicate contact lens wear.
- Clinically significant (grade 3 or 4) tarsal abnormalities that might interfere with contact lens wear.
- Any ocular infection.
- Any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid gas permeable contact lens wear.
- Pregnancy or lactation
- Any infectious disease (e.g., hepatitis, tuberculosis) or a contagious immunosuppressive disease (e.g., HIV).
- History of diabetes. History of binocular vision abnormality or strabismus.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Unknown Facility
Roanoke, Virginia, 24153, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Tom Karkkainen, OD
- Organization
- Vistakon
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 12, 2008
First Posted
December 15, 2008
Study Start
November 1, 2008
Primary Completion
December 1, 2008
Study Completion
December 1, 2008
Last Updated
June 19, 2018
Results First Posted
August 26, 2010
Record last verified: 2017-08