NCT00808340

Brief Summary

The primary purpose of the study is to compare the performance of three soft bifocal contact lenses in terms of the vision provided by the lenses.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
37

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2008

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2008

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2008

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 12, 2008

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

December 15, 2008

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 26, 2010

Completed
Last Updated

June 19, 2018

Status Verified

August 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

December 12, 2008

Results QC Date

July 30, 2010

Last Update Submit

June 18, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Distance Bright Illumination Binocular Visual Performance Reported as Visual Acuity

    Tested with both eyes together in bright lighting, reading charts distant to the subject. This outcome is measured in logMAR units.LogMAR stands for the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution. Ideal is 0.0 and represents 20/20 Snellen acuity. logMAR values \> 0.00 indicate vision poorer than the ideal and values \<0.00 indicate vision greater than the ideal.

    5 minutes after insertion

  • Near Bright Illumination Binocular Visual Performance Reported as Visual Acuity

    Tested with both eyes together in bright lighting reading charts near to the subject. This outcome is measured in logMAR units.LogMAR stands for the logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution. Ideal is 0.0 and represents 20/20 Snellen acuity. logMAR values \> 0.00 indicate vision poorer than the ideal and values \<0.00 indicate vision greater than the ideal.

    5 minutes after insertion

  • Type of Corneal Staining

    Investigator rated type of corneal staining as either 0=none, 1=micropunctate, 2=macropunctate, 3=coalesced, or 4=patch(\> or = to mm).

    after 1 week of lens wear, for each lens type

  • Overall Subjective Vision

    Subject rated the overall quality of vision with the study contact lenses. 5=excellent, 4=very good, 3=good, 2=fair, 1=poor.

    after 1 week of lens wear, for each lens type

Study Arms (6)

senofilA test/senofilA prod/balafilconA

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects wear 3 multifocal contact lenses: senofilcon A test worn first, senofilcon A production worn second, and balafilcon A worn third.

Device: balafilcon ADevice: senofilcon A productionDevice: senofilcon A test

senofilcon A test/balafilcon A/senofilcon A prod

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects wear 3 multifocal contact lenses: senofilcon A test worn first, balafilcon A worn second, and senofilcon A production worn third.

Device: balafilcon ADevice: senofilcon A productionDevice: senofilcon A test

senofilcon A prod/senofilcon A test/balafilcon A

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects wear 3 multifocal contact lenses: senofilcon A production worn first, senofilcon A test worn second, and balafilcon A worn third.

Device: balafilcon ADevice: senofilcon A productionDevice: senofilcon A test

senofilcon A prod/ balifilcon A/ senofilcon A test

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects wear 3 multifocal contact lenses: senofilcon A production worn first, balafilcon A worn second, and senofilcon A test worn third.

Device: balafilcon ADevice: senofilcon A productionDevice: senofilcon A test

balafilcon A/senofilcon A test/senofilcon A prod

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects wear 3 multifocal contact lenses: balafilcon A worn first, senofilcon A test worn second, and senofilcon A production worn third.

Device: balafilcon ADevice: senofilcon A productionDevice: senofilcon A test

balafilcon A/senofilcon A prod/senofilcon A test

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Subjects wear 3 multifocal contact lenses: balafilcon A worn first, senofilcon A production worn second, senofilcon A test worn third.

Device: balafilcon ADevice: senofilcon A productionDevice: senofilcon A test

Interventions

multifocal contact lens

balafilcon A/senofilcon A prod/senofilcon A testbalafilcon A/senofilcon A test/senofilcon A prodsenofilA test/senofilA prod/balafilconAsenofilcon A prod/ balifilcon A/ senofilcon A testsenofilcon A prod/senofilcon A test/balafilcon Asenofilcon A test/balafilcon A/senofilcon A prod

multifocal contact lens

balafilcon A/senofilcon A prod/senofilcon A testbalafilcon A/senofilcon A test/senofilcon A prodsenofilA test/senofilA prod/balafilconAsenofilcon A prod/ balifilcon A/ senofilcon A testsenofilcon A prod/senofilcon A test/balafilcon Asenofilcon A test/balafilcon A/senofilcon A prod

multifocal contact lens

balafilcon A/senofilcon A prod/senofilcon A testbalafilcon A/senofilcon A test/senofilcon A prodsenofilA test/senofilA prod/balafilconAsenofilcon A prod/ balifilcon A/ senofilcon A testsenofilcon A prod/senofilcon A test/balafilcon Asenofilcon A test/balafilcon A/senofilcon A prod

Eligibility Criteria

Age35 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • The subject must between 35 and 70 years of age.
  • The subject must respond positively to at least one symptom on the "Presbyopic Symptoms Questionnaire" or be already wearing presbyopic contact lens correction ( e.g. reading spectacles over contact lenses, multifocal or monovision contact lenses etc.).
  • The subject's spherical equivalent distance refraction must be in the range of -1.00 to -6.00 in each eye.
  • Refractive cylinder must be less than or equal to -0.75 D in each eye.
  • The subject must have an add power of +0.75D to +2.50D in each eye.
  • The subject must have best corrected visual acuity of 20/20-3 or better in each eye.
  • The subject's must have at least 20/30-distance vision with the study contact lenses.
  • The subject must agree that they are comfortable with their vision prior to being dispensed the study lenses.
  • The subject must be an adapted soft contact lens wearer in both eyes.
  • The subject must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.
  • The subject must read and sign the STATEMENT OF INFORMED CONSENT and be provided a copy of the form.

You may not qualify if:

  • Ocular or systemic allergies or disease that may interfere with contact lens wear.
  • Systemic disease, autoimmune disease or use of medication, which may interfere with contact lens wear.
  • Clinically significant (grade 3 or 4) corneal edema, corneal vascularization, corneal staining or any other abnormality of the cornea, which may contraindicate contact lens wear.
  • Clinically significant (grade 3 or 4) tarsal abnormalities that might interfere with contact lens wear.
  • Any ocular infection.
  • Any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid gas permeable contact lens wear.
  • Pregnancy or lactation
  • Any infectious disease (e.g., hepatitis, tuberculosis) or a contagious immunosuppressive disease (e.g., HIV).
  • History of diabetes. History of binocular vision abnormality or strabismus.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Unknown Facility

Roanoke, Virginia, 24153, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Presbyopia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Refractive ErrorsEye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Tom Karkkainen, OD
Organization
Vistakon

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 12, 2008

First Posted

December 15, 2008

Study Start

November 1, 2008

Primary Completion

December 1, 2008

Study Completion

December 1, 2008

Last Updated

June 19, 2018

Results First Posted

August 26, 2010

Record last verified: 2017-08

Locations