Clinical Evaluation of a Multifocal Contact Lens on Symptomatic Patients
2 other identifiers
interventional
49
1 country
8
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to evaluate the effect of a multi-focal contact lens on symptomatic patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Oct 2009
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
8 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
October 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 18, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
November 19, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2009
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 23, 2014
CompletedJune 19, 2018
August 1, 2017
2 months
November 18, 2009
September 19, 2013
June 18, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Subject Reported Overall Vision Quality Using (CLUE)TM Questionnaire
The Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE) Questionnaire is a validated patient-reported outcomes questionnaire to assess patient-experience attributes of soft, disposable contact lenses in the US, ages 18-65. Scores follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response, with scores ranging from 0-120.
week 4
Monocular Amplitude of Accommodation
The amplitude of accommodation is a measure of the eyes ability to accommodate or focus on near objects. The method used was the push-up/push-down method performed monocularly. One eye was occluded and using the smallest print the subject was able to read, the reading chart was slowly moved towards the subject. The subject was asked them to indicate when the print first becomes blurred. The distance was noted and the amplitude of accommodation was calculated.
week 4
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Proportion of Subjects With Near Vision Symptoms as Assessed by the NVQ
week 4
Subject Reported Lens Comfort Using CLUE Questionnaire
week 4
Comfortable Wearing Time
week 4
Proportion of Subjects Benefiting From the Binocular +/-1.00D Accommodative Flipper
Baseline
Study Arms (2)
etafilcon A multifocal / etafilcon A sphere
OTHERperiod 1: etafilcon A multifocal worn, period 2: etafilcon A sphere worn.
etafilcon A sphere / etafilcon A multifocal
OTHERperiod 1: etafilcon A sphere worn, period 2: etafilcon A multifocal worn.
Interventions
low-add multifocal contact lens
standard sphere contact lens
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- To have signed an informed consent form (documented by the investigator in the Case Report Form \[CRF\]).
- Be existing daily wear spherical single-vision soft CL wearers (no extended wear in the last 3 months, but silicone hydrogels in daily wear are allowed).
- Between 35 and 47 years of age (inclusive).
- Have a CL spherical distance requirement between -1.00D and -6.00D (-6.50D refractive) in both eyes.
- Refractive astigmatism of 0.75D or less in both eyes.
- Visual symptoms associated with near vision
- Be correctable to a visual acuity of 6/9 (20/30) or better in each eye.
- Have normal eyes with no evidence of abnormality or disease. For the purpose of this study a normal eye is defined as one having:
- No amblyopia.
- No evidence of lid abnormality or infection.
- No conjunctival abnormality or infection.
- No clinically significant slit lamp findings (i.e. stromal haze, staining, scarring, Vascularization, infiltrates or abnormal opacities).
- No other active ocular disease.
You may not qualify if:
- Monovision user or multifocal CL wearer.
- Regular user of reading spectacles (i.e. daily usage).
- Requires concurrent ocular medication.
- Clinically significant (Grade 3 or 4) corneal stromal haze, corneal Vascularization, tarsal abnormalities, bulbar hyperemia, limbal hyperemia, or any other abnormality of the cornea that would contraindicate CL wear.
- Corneal staining Grade 3 in more than two regions.
- Has had any anterior ocular surgery. Has had any other ocular surgery or injury within 8 weeks immediately prior to enrollment for this study.
- Pre-existing ocular irritation that would preclude CL fitting.
- Keratoconus or other corneal irregularity.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Johnson & Johnson Vision Care, Inc.lead
- Visioncare Research Ltd.collaborator
Study Sites (8)
Unknown Facility
North Little Rock, Arkansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Blue Springs, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Lake Ozark, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Warren, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Kittanning, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Warwick, Rhode Island, United States
Unknown Facility
Chamberlain, South Dakota, United States
Unknown Facility
Burlington, Vermont, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Thomas R. Karkkainen OD, MS, FAAO Senior Principal Research Optometrist
- Organization
- Johnson & Johnson Vision Care
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 18, 2009
First Posted
November 19, 2009
Study Start
October 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2009
Study Completion
December 1, 2009
Last Updated
June 19, 2018
Results First Posted
January 23, 2014
Record last verified: 2017-08