Evaluation of an Investigational Multifocal Lens
1 other identifier
interventional
371
1 country
20
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to test the performance of an investigational multifocal test soft contact lens.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Aug 2014
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
20 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 20, 2014
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 22, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 31, 2016
CompletedJune 19, 2018
July 1, 2016
3 months
August 20, 2014
June 8, 2016
June 18, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Overall Quality of Vision Using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE) TM Questionnaire
CLUE Overall Quality of Vision is assessed using the Contact Lens User Experience (CLUE)TM questionnaire. CLUE is a validated patient-reported outcomes questionnaire to assess patient experience attributes of soft, disposable contact lenses (comfort, vision, handling, and packaging) in a contact-lens wearing population in the US, ages 18-65. Scores follow a normal distribution with a population average score of 60 (SD 20), where higher scores indicate a more favorable/positive response. 97% of the scores fall within 0 and 120 (mean +/-3XSD).
8 -12 days post wear
Distance Binocular Visual Acuity (LogMAR)
Distance time controlled LogMAR Visual Acuity was carried out binocularly with high luminance and high contrast.
8- 12 Days post wear
Intermediate Binocular Visual Acuity (LogMAR)
Intermediate time controlled LogMAR Visual Acuity was carried out binocularly using High lumiance and High Contrast.
8-12 days post wear
Near Binocular Visual Acuity (LogMAR)
Near time controlled LogMAR Visual Acuity was carried out binocularly using High lumiance and High Contrast.
8-12 days post wear
Corneal Staining
Corneal staining is evaluated using Sodium Fluorescein strips. The Fluorescien strip was lightly placed on the subject's inferior palpebral conjunctiva. The corneal Staining was graded using the scale Grade 0: No Staining, Grade 1: Trace(Minimal superficial staining or stippling), Grade 2: Mild (Regional or diffuse punctate staining), Grade 3:Moderate(Significant dense coalesced staining, corneal abrasion or foreign body tracks.), Grade 4 Severe(Severe abrasions greater than 2 mm in diameter, ulcerations, epithelial loss, or full thickness abrasion.). The data was dichotomized into two group subjects with grade 3 or higher staining, and those subjects with less than Grade 3. Below the percentage of subject eyes with grade 3 or higher is reported for each lens.
8 - 12 Days post wear
Bulbar Conjunctival Injection
The bulbar is the scelra. Bulbar Conjunctival Injection was assessed using an Efron Grading scale by 1 unit increments. Grade 0: Normal, Grade 1: Trace, Grade 2: Mild, Grade 3: Moderate, Grade 4:Severe. The data was dichotomized into two group subjects with grade 3 or higher Conjunctival injection, and those subjects with less than Grade 3. Below the percentage of subject eyes with grade 3 or higher is reported for each lens.
8- 12 Days post wear
Limbal Conjunctival Injection
The Limbus is the 1 to 2mm wide zone of conjunctiva and underlying tissue adjacent to where the cornea joins the sclera. Limbal Conjunctival Injection was assesed using the Efron grading scale in 1 unit increments. Grade 0: Normal, Grade 1: Trace, Grade 2: Mild, Grade 3: Moderate, Grade 4:Severe. The data was dichotomized into two group subjects with grade 3 or higher Conjunctival injection, and those subjects with less than Grade 3. Below the percentage of subject eyes with grade 3 or higher is reported for each lens.
8- 12 Days post wear
Contact Lens Fitting
Contact Lens fitting is reported as a binary response. Yes- acceptable lens fit, No- unacceptable lens fit. The percentage of subject eyes with acceptable fit is reported.
8- 12 Days post wear
Study Arms (2)
lotrafilcon B / etafilcon A
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubject randomized to this sequence will first be dispensed the lotrafilcon B contact lens and then the etafilcon A contact lens.
etafilcon A / lotrafilcon B
EXPERIMENTALSubject randomized to this sequence will first be dispensed the etafilcon A contact lens and then the lotrafilcon B contact lens.
Interventions
Soft contact lens to be worn as daily wear, monthly replacement modality.
Soft contact lens to be worn as daily wear, daily disposable modality.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- The subjects were required to have read, understand, and signed the Statement of Informed Consent and receive a fully executed copy of the form.
- The subject must appear able and willing to adhere to the instructions set forth in this clinical protocol.
- Between 40 and 70 years of age.
- Subjects must own a wearable pair of spectacles, if required for their distance vision.
- Be an adapted soft contact lens wearer in both eyes (i.e. worn lenses a minimum of 2 days per week for at least 8 hours per wear day, for 1 month of more duration)
- Already be wearing a presbyopic contact lens correction (e.g., reading spectacles over contact lenses, multifocal or monovision contact lenses, etc.) or if not respond positively to at least one symptom on the "Presbyopic Symptoms Questionnaire"\*
- The subject's vertex corrected spherical equivalent distance refraction was required to be in the range +3.50 to -5.75 in each eye.
- Refractive cylinder ≤ -0.75 D in each eye.
- ADD power in the range +0.75 D to +2.50 D in each eye.
- Best corrected visual acuity of 20/20-3 or better in each eye.
You may not qualify if:
- Currently pregnant or lactating (subjects who became pregnant during the study were discontinued).
- Any ocular or systemic allergies that may have contraindicated contact lens wear.
- Any ocular or systemic disease, autoimmune disease, or use of medication, that may have contraindicated contact lens wear.
- Any ocular abnormality that may have interfered with contact lens wear.
- Use of any ocular medication, with the exception of rewetting drops.
- Any previous intraocular surgery (e.g., radial keratotomy, PRK, LASIK, etc.).
- History of herpetic keratitis.
- History of binocular vision abnormality or strabismus.
- Any infectious disease (e.g., hepatitis, tuberculosis) or a contagious immunosuppressive disease (e.g., HIV).
- History of diabetes.
- Participation in any contact lens or lens care product clinical trial within 30 days prior to study enrollment.
- Any Grade 3 or greater slit lamp findings (e.g., edema, corneal neovascularization, corneal staining, tarsal abnormalities, conjunctival injection) which may contraindicate contact lens wear.
- Any ocular infection or inflammation.
- Any corneal distortion or irregular cornea.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (20)
Unknown Facility
Montgomery, Alabama, 36109, United States
Unknown Facility
Mission Viejo, California, 92691, United States
Unknown Facility
Jacksonville, Florida, 32205, United States
Unknown Facility
Jacksonville, Florida, 32250, United States
Unknown Facility
Orange Park, Florida, 32065, United States
Unknown Facility
Saint Augustine, Florida, 32092, United States
Unknown Facility
Tallahassee, Florida, 32308, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, 33625, United States
Unknown Facility
Winter Park, Florida, 32792, United States
Unknown Facility
Roswell, Georgia, 30076, United States
Unknown Facility
Pittsburg, Kansas, 66762, United States
Unknown Facility
East Lansing, Michigan, 48823, United States
Unknown Facility
Vestal, New York, 13850, United States
Unknown Facility
Denver, North Carolina, 28037, United States
Unknown Facility
Powell, Ohio, 43065, United States
Unknown Facility
Springfield, Ohio, 45503, United States
Unknown Facility
Warwick, Rhode Island, 02888, United States
Unknown Facility
Memphis, Tennessee, 38119, United States
Unknown Facility
Tyler, Texas, 75701, United States
Unknown Facility
Salem, Virginia, 24153, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Thomas R. Karkkainen, O.D., M.S., F.A.A.O., Sr. Principal Research Optemtrist
- Organization
- Johnson & Johnson Vision Care Inc.
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 20, 2014
First Posted
August 22, 2014
Study Start
August 1, 2014
Primary Completion
November 1, 2014
Study Completion
November 1, 2014
Last Updated
June 19, 2018
Results First Posted
August 31, 2016
Record last verified: 2016-07