A Trial of Temsirolimus With Etoposide and Cyclophosphamide in Children With Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma
A Phase I Trial of Temsirolimus (CCI-779, Pfizer, Inc.) in Combination With Etoposide and Cyclophosphamide in Children With Relapsed Acute Lymphoblastic Leukemia and Non-Hodgkins Lymphoma
1 other identifier
interventional
16
3 countries
32
Brief Summary
This is a phase I study of temsirolimus (Torisel) combined with dexamethasone, cyclophosphamide and etoposide in patients with relapsed acute lymphoblastic leukemia (ALL), lymphoblastic lymphoma (LL) or peripheral T-cell lymphoma (PTL).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_1
Started Jul 2015
Longer than P75 for phase_1
32 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 18, 2012
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
June 7, 2012
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 3, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 15, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 4, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
July 27, 2023
CompletedJuly 27, 2023
July 1, 2023
4.5 years
May 18, 2012
August 11, 2022
July 25, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Patients That Experienced DLT During Cycle 1 of Therapy
The incidence of dose limiting toxicity (DLT) will be measured. The maximum tolerated dose will be the highest study dose at which 1 or fewer of six patients experience DLT during cycle 1 of therapy. All these analyses will be descriptive and exploratory and hypotheses generating in nature.
Cycle 1 (a minimum of 4 weeks and a max of 8 weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Response Rate at the Completion of 1 Cycle of Study Treatment
Cycle 1 (a minimum of 4 weeks and a max of 8 weeks)
Minimum Residual Disease (MRD) Levels Present at End of Cycle 1 Therapy in Patients
Cycle 1 (a minimum of 4 weeks and a max of 8 weeks)
Study Arms (4)
Dose Level 1
EXPERIMENTALThis is the starting dose of temsirolimus at 7.5 mg/m\^2 given IV. First dose of temsirolimus will be administered on Day 1, followed immediately by the first dose of IV etoposide and IV cyclophosphamide. Etoposide (100mg/m\^2) and cyclophosphamide (440 mg/m\^2) are continued for the next four days (Day 1-5). A second dose of temsirolimus is given on Day 8.
Dose Level 2
EXPERIMENTALIf Dose Level 1 is tolerated, the study will escalate to Dose Level 2 following the dose escalation schedule. Dose Level 2 will be administered via IV at 10 mg/m\^2. First dose of temsirolimus will be administered on Day 1, followed immediately by the first dose of IV etoposide and IV cyclophosphamide. Etoposide (100mg/m\^2) and cyclophosphamide (440 mg/m\^2) are continued for the next four days (Day 1-5). A second dose of temsirolimus is given on Day 8.
Dose Level 3
EXPERIMENTALIf Dose Level 2 is tolerated, the study will escalate to Dose Level 3 following the dose escalation schedule. Dose Level 3 will be administered via IV at 15 mg/m\^2. First dose of temsirolimus will be administered on Day 1, followed immediately by the first dose of IV etoposide and IV cyclophosphamide. Etoposide (100mg/m\^2) and cyclophosphamide (440 mg/m\^2) are continued for the next four days (Day 1-5). A second dose of temsirolimus is given on Day 8.
Dose Level 4
EXPERIMENTALIf Dose Level 3 is tolerated, the study will escalate to Dose Level 4 following the dose escalation schedule. Dose Level 4 will be administered via IV at 25 mg/m\^2. First dose of temsirolimus will be administered on Day 1, followed immediately by the first dose of IV etoposide and IV cyclophosphamide. Etoposide (100mg/m\^2) and cyclophosphamide (440 mg/m\^2) are continued for the next four days (Day 1-5). A second dose of temsirolimus is given on Day 8. Temsirolimus will not be escalated beyond Dose Level 4.
Interventions
Dose will be assigned at study entry. Give IV over 30 minutes on days 1 and 8.
100 mg/m2 IV over 1-2 hours daily x 5 on Days 1-5.
440 mg/m2 IV daily x 5 on Days 1-5 given over 30-60 minutes.
PATIENTS WITH CNS 1 COURSES 2, 4, 6, 8: Give intrathecally to patients who were CNS1 at study entry day 1 of each course at the doses listed below. * Age 1 - 1.99 give 8 mg of methotrexate * Age 2 - 2.99 give10 mg of methotrexate * Age 3 - 8.99 give 12 mg of methotrexate * Age ≥ 9 give 15 mg of methotrexate PATIENTS WITH CNS 2 or 3 DISEASE -COURSE 1: Give intrathecally to patients with CNS 2 or 3 disease at the doses defined by age below on day 6 and then weekly until the patient is CNS 1. COURSES 2-8: Give intrathecally to patients who were CNS 3 at study entry on day 1 of each course. * 8 mg for patients age 1-1.99 * 10 mg for patients age 2-2.99 * 12 mg for patients 3-8.99 years of age * 15 mg for patients \>9 years of age
Given with Methotrexate and Cytarabine for patients with CNS 2 or 3 disease. COURSE 1: Give intrathecally to patients with CNS 2 or 3 disease at the doses defined by age below on day 6 and then weekly until the patient is CNS 1. COURSES 2-8: Give intrathecally to patients who were CNS 3 at study entry on day 1 of each course. * 8 mg for patients age 1-1.99 * 10 mg for patients age 2-2.99 * 12 mg for patients 3-8.99 years of age * 15 mg for patients \>9 years of age
For Patients who are CNS1 COURSE 1: Give intrathecally to patients with CNS1 disease at the dose defined by age below on day 1 of course 1 if no other IT was given within 1 week of day 1 of course 1 * Age 1 - 1.99 give 30 mg of Cytarabine * Age 2 - 2.99 give 50mg of Cytarabine * Age ≥ 3 give 70 mg of Cytabine For Patients with CNS 2 or 3 Disease COURSE 1: Give intrathecally to patients with CNS 2 or 3 disease at the doses defined by age below on day 1 if no other IT chemotherapy given within 1 week of day 1 of course 1. Then give weekly until the patient is CNS 1 or 2 (investigator discretion). No more than 5 weekly doses to be given in cycle 1. COURSES 2-8: Give intrathecally to patients who were CNS 2or 3 at study entry on day 1 of each course. * 16 mg for patients age 1-1.99 * 20 mg for patients age 2-2.99 * 24 mg for patients 3-8.99 years of age * 30 mg for patients \>9 years of age
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients must be greater than or equal to 12 months and ≤ 21 years of age at the time of study enrollment.
- Patients must have one of the following:
- Leukemia
- Bone marrow involvement defined as ALL ≥ 25% blasts (M2 or M3) with or without extramedullary involvement.
- Refractory bone marrow involvement defined as MRD ≥ 0.1% blasts done at a COG-approved MRD testing lab after most recent treatment regimen. in the bone marrow (M23) and any CNS status. OR
- Newly diagnosed patients (T or B-cell ALL) with refractory bone marrow involvement after Consolidation therapy are eligible.
- First relapse B-cell ALL patients are eligible with refractory disease.
- Second or greater relapse B-cell patients are eligible at time of relapse or with refractory disease.
- First or greater relapse T-cell ALL patients are eligible at time of relapse or with refractory disease.
- Isolated CNS 2 or 3 patients with \< 0.1% MRD bone marrow involvement are not eligible.
- Lymphoma
- Patient must have relapsed or refractory lymphoblastic lymphoma or peripheral T-cell lymphoma.
- Patient must have histologic verification of disease at original diagnosis.
- Patient must have evaluable or measurable disease documented by clinical or radiographic criteria or bone marrow disease present at study entry.
- Patients may have CNS 2 or 3 disease
- +7 more criteria
You may not qualify if:
- XRT: At least 14 days after local palliative XRT (small port); At least 84 days must have elapsed if prior TBI, craniospinal XRT or if greater than or equal to 50% radiation of pelvis; At least 42 days must have elapsed if other substantial marrow radiation.
- Stem Cell Infusion: No evidence of active graft vs. host disease and at least 84 days must have elapsed after transplant or stem cell infusion.
- Adequate Bone Marrow Function Defined as: Blood counts are not required to be normal prior to enrollment on trial. However, platelet count must be greater than or equal to 20,000/mm3 to initiate therapy (may receive platelet transfusions). Patients should not be known to be refractory to red blood cell or platelet transfusions.
- Adequate Renal Function Defined as:
- Creatinine clearance or radioisotope GFR greater than or equal to 70ml/min/1.73 m2 or
- Normal serum creatinine based on age and gender.
- Adequate Liver Function Defined as:
- Total bilirubin (sum of conjugated + unconjugated) must be less than or equal to 1.5 x normal per institutional normal values for age.
- SGPT (ALT) and SGOT (AST) must be less than 3 x institutional upper limit of normal (Grade 1 or less per CTCAE 4).
- GGT must be less than 2.5 x institutional upper limit of normal (Grade 1 or less per CTCAE 4).
- Serum albumin greater than or equal to 2 g/dL.
- The hepatic requirements may be waived for patients with elevations clearly due to leukemic infiltration after consultation with the Study Chair or Vice Chair.
- Fasting or non-fasting serum triglyceride level ≤ 300 mg/dL and serum cholesterol level ≤ 300 mg/dL.
- Adequate Cardiac Function Defined As:
- Shortening fraction of ≥ 27% by echocardiogram, or
- +29 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia Consortiumlead
- Pfizercollaborator
Study Sites (32)
Childrens Hospital Los Angeles
Los Angeles, California, 90027, United States
Children's Hospital Orange County
Orange, California, United States
UCSF School of Medicine
San Francisco, California, 94143-0106, United States
The Children's Hospital, University of Colorado
Aurora, Colorado, 80045, United States
Children's National Medical Center
Washington D.C., District of Columbia, United States
University of Miami Cancer Center
Miami, Florida, 33136, United States
Children's Healthcare of Atlanta, Emory University
Atlanta, Georgia, 30322, United States
Lurie Children's Hospital
Chicago, Illinois, United States
Johns Hopkins University
Baltimore, Maryland, 21231, United States
Dana Farber
Boston, Massachusetts, 02215, United States
C.S. Mott Children's Hospital
Ann Arbor, Michigan, 48109-0914, United States
Childrens Hospital & Clinics of Minnesota
Minneapolis, Minnesota, 55404-4597, United States
Children's Hospital New York-Presbyterian
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Levine Children's Hospital at Carolinas Medical Center
Charlotte, North Carolina, 28203, United States
Rainbow Babies
Cleveland, Ohio, 44106, United States
Nationwide Childrens Hospital
Columbus, Ohio, United States
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, United States
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, 19104, United States
St. Jude
Memphis, Tennessee, 38105-3678, United States
University of Texas at Southwestern
Dallas, Texas, 75235, United States
Cook Children's Medical Center
Fort Worth, Texas, 76104, United States
Texas Children's Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
Primary Children's
Salt Lake City, Utah, United States
Seattle Children's Hospital
Seattle, Washington, 98105, United States
Medical College of Wisconsin
Milwaukee, Wisconsin, United States
Children's Hospital at Westmead
Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
Royal Children's Hospital
Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
Royal Children's Hospital, Melbourne
Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
Sydney Children's Hospital
Sydney, Australia
Hospital for Sick Kids
Toronto, Ontario, Canada
Sainte Justine University Hospital
Montreal, Quebec, Canada
British Columbia Children's Hospital
Vancouver, Canada
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
All these analyses will be descriptive and exploratory and hypotheses generating in nature.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Roy Leong
- Organization
- Therapeutic Advances in Childhood Leukemia and Lymphoma (TACL)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Susan Rheingold, MD
Children's Hospital of Philadelphia
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 1
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 18, 2012
First Posted
June 7, 2012
Study Start
July 3, 2015
Primary Completion
December 15, 2019
Study Completion
September 4, 2020
Last Updated
July 27, 2023
Results First Posted
July 27, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-07
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share