NCT01292382

Brief Summary

Memory is constituted by a set of mental abilities of information processing that will be available at a later time. Flawless performance depends on several brain systems and other cognitive domains. Normal aging is characterized by cognitive deficits that may worsen the production capacity and quality of life. Such deficits represent variations of normal , and may stabilize,or even better progress. Include multiple cognitive domains, such as working and episodic memory, and attention. Despite the heterogeneity of the nature and severity of these deficits, common characteristics were observed in neuropsychological assessment of that population, for example, reduction in processing speed. There is an important gap in the therapeutic approach of these individuals. Transcranial magnetic stimulation (TMS) is a noninvasive and promising intervention, with potential to improve memory and cognition activating networks that operate on memory or other networks that interfere with cognitive performance. The technique relies on generating a variable magnetic field originated from an alternating electric current applied to the human skull reaching focal cortical regions. This study is a sham-controlled clinical trial, randomized, double-blind study. It will be evaluated the effects of repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (rTMS) on global cognition (memory, attention, language, executive functions, planning, logical reasoning, calculation and visual-spatial perception), especially memory, of elderly individuals with mild cognitive impairment, included in the domain of cognitive impairment no dementia (CIND).

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
34

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2010

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 5, 2010

Completed
27 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2010

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

February 9, 2011

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 1, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

April 21, 2011

Status Verified

August 1, 2010

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

October 5, 2010

Last Update Submit

April 20, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

ElderlyMemoryCognitionRepetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves memory in elderly with memory complaints

    Neuropsychological tests - RBMT (Rivermead Behavioral and Memory Test)

    Neuropsychological tests: T1 - effects after rTMS, and T2: 4 weeks after rTMS

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation improves global cognition of elderly with memory complaints

    Neuropsychological tests: T1 - effects after rTMS, and T2: 4 weeks after rTMS

Study Arms (2)

rTMS versus Sham

SHAM COMPARATOR

rTMS: active coil Sham: inactive coil

Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

rTMS versus sham

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

rTMS group: active coil Sham group: inactive coil

Device: Repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation

Interventions

Intensity: 110% of motor threshold Frequency: 10 Hz Number of trains: 40 trains Duration of trains: 5 seconds Interval: 25 seconds Number of sessions: 10 sessions Duration of intervention: two consecutive weeks

Also known as: Active rTMS group, Sham rTMS group
rTMS versus ShamrTMS versus sham

Eligibility Criteria

Age60 Years - 74 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants of both sexes
  • Aged between 60 and 74 years
  • Schooling ≥ 4 years
  • Performance on neuropsychological tests of up to 1.5 standard deviations below normal for age and education
  • Signing an informed consent by the participant or his guardian.

You may not qualify if:

  • Prior diagnosis of dementia.
  • Any psychiatric disorder, except for mild depression for at least six months.
  • Shall be excluded those with scores\> 12 on the Hamilton scale.
  • History of neurosurgery and implantation of metal clips, head trauma, implantation of cardiac pacemakers, stroke, transient ischemic attack, cardiac surgery
  • Clinical or neurological diseases with an impact on cognitive ability
  • Neurodegenerative central nervous system (eg Parkinson's disease)
  • Alcohol and other drug dependency with abstinence for less than a year
  • Use of psychotropic medications (anticholinergic, mood stabilizers, neuroleptics), except for antidepressants
  • Chronic use of benzodiazepines with abstinence for less than six months
  • Use of vitamin supplements (multivitamins, folic acid, vitamin B12), ginkgo biloba
  • Severe uncontrolled organic disease that could interfere in the conduct of the study, such as cancer, heart disease, digestive disorders, diabetes mellitus type I or type II, uncontrolled dyslipidemia etc.
  • Sensory disabilities, intellectual, preventing them from adequately perform the necessary tests to assess cognitive function
  • Cerebrovascular disease based on Hachinsky score.
  • History of head trauma.
  • Worsening of the primary symptoms during the treatment.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

São Paulo, São Paulo, 05453-010, Brazil

RECRUITING

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cognitive Dysfunction

Interventions

Transcranial Magnetic Stimulation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Cognition DisordersNeurocognitive DisordersMental Disorders

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Magnetic Field TherapyTherapeutics

Study Officials

  • Marco Marcolin

    University of Sao Paulo General Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 5, 2010

First Posted

February 9, 2011

Study Start

November 1, 2010

Primary Completion

November 1, 2010

Study Completion

July 1, 2012

Last Updated

April 21, 2011

Record last verified: 2010-08

Locations