Study Comparing ABVD vs BEACOPP in Advanced Hodgkin's Lymphoma
Prospective Randomized Comparison of ABVD Versus BEACOPP Chemotherapy With or Without Radiotherapy for Advanced Stage or Unfavorable Hodgkin's Lymphoma (HL)
1 other identifier
interventional
331
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The choice of a preferred first-line treatment requires balancing the desire for optimal disease control with the occurrence of early and late treatment-related effects. To fully assess this balance, the treatment decision process should ideally take into account the outcome following a consistent second-line therapy, in particular when tolerated, widely applicable and highly effective salvage regimens exist, like in Hodgkin lymphoma failing initial chemotherapy.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_3
Started Mar 2000
Longer than P75 for phase_3
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2000
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 1, 2009
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
November 26, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
December 1, 2010
CompletedAugust 13, 2015
February 1, 2011
9.7 years
November 26, 2010
August 11, 2015
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Freedom from first progression at 5 years
After a median of 5 years from start of the study
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Freedom from second progression at 5 years
After a median of 5 years from start of protocol
Overall survival at 5 years
After a median of 5 years from start of the protocol
Number of participants with acute adverse events at initial therapy and at salvage therapy as a measure of safety and tolerability
After 3 months from last intervention
Number of participants long term sequelae
After a median of 10 years
Study Arms (2)
Arm B
EXPERIMENTALBEACOPP (Bleomycin, etoposide, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide, vincristine, procarbazine, prednisone) for 4 escalated cycles followed by 4 standard cycles
Arm A
ACTIVE COMPARATORABVD (doxorubicin, bleomycin, vinblastine, dacarbazine) for 6 to 8 cycles
Interventions
200 mg/m2 iv on days 1 to 3 during cycles 1 to 4; 100 mg/m2 iv on days 1 to 3 during cycles 5 to 8
35 mg/2 iv on day 1 during cycles 1 to 4; 25 mg/m2 iv on day 1 during cycles 5 to 8
1250 mg/m2 iv on day 1 during cycles 1 to 4; 650 mg/m2 iv on day 1 during cycles 5 to 8
1.4 mg/m2 iv (max 2 mg) on day 8 during cycles 1 to 8
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Histologically confirmed, newly diagnosed Hodgkin's lymphoma (pathological review diagnosis available)
- No prior treatment
- Stage II B, III A and B, IV A and B
- Normal hematopoietic function as measured by leucocytes equal to or greater than 3500/mm3, neutrophils equal to or greater than 1500/mm3, platelets equal to or greater than 100000/mm3
- Normal renal function (serum creatinine \< 1,5x ULN) and normal liver function (SGOT/SGPT equal to or lower than 2.5x ULN; bilirubin equal to or lower than 1.5x ULN)
- No significant history or current evidence of cardiovascular disease, or major respiratory disease
- No severe neurologic or psychiatric disease
- No other malignancy except basal cell carcinoma of the skin and/or in situ cervical carcinoma of the uterus
- Serological negativity for hepatitis B or C or HIV infection
- ECOG performance status equal to or lower than 2
- Life expectancy of at least three months
- Effective contraception in all patients and a negative pregnancy test for women of childbearing potential
- Written informed consent and consent to a regular follow-up in the outpatient clinic
You may not qualify if:
- Sever central nervous system or psychiatric disease
- History or current evidence of clinically significant cardiac disease (congestive heart failure, uncontrolled hypertension, unstable coronary artery disease or myocardial infarction or severe arrhythmias. Left ventricular ejection fraction \< 50% at rest by echocardiography or \< 55% by isotopic measurement
- Serological positivity for HBV, HCV or HIV
- History or current evidence of malignancy other than basal cell carcinoma of the skin, carcinoma in situ of the cervix
- Lactating or pregnant women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale di Tumori di Milano
Milan, Italy
Related Publications (1)
Viviani S, Zinzani PL, Rambaldi A, Brusamolino E, Levis A, Bonfante V, Vitolo U, Pulsoni A, Liberati AM, Specchia G, Valagussa P, Rossi A, Zaja F, Pogliani EM, Pregno P, Gotti M, Gallamini A, Rota Scalabrini D, Bonadonna G, Gianni AM; Michelangelo Foundation; Gruppo Italiano di Terapie Innovative nei Linfomi; Intergruppo Italiano Linfomi. ABVD versus BEACOPP for Hodgkin's lymphoma when high-dose salvage is planned. N Engl J Med. 2011 Jul 21;365(3):203-12. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1100340.
PMID: 21774708DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Alessandro M Gianni, MD
Fondazione IRCCS Istituto Nazionale Tumori di Milano
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
November 26, 2010
First Posted
December 1, 2010
Study Start
March 1, 2000
Primary Completion
November 1, 2009
Study Completion
November 1, 2009
Last Updated
August 13, 2015
Record last verified: 2011-02