The Beneficial Effects of a Protein-rich Breakfast on Appetite Control & Cognition in Overweight and Obese Adolescents
1 other identifier
interventional
22
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to assess whether the daily addition of a protein-rich breakfast leads to beneficial changes in appetite control, food intake regulation,and cognitive function in overweight \& obese 'breakfast skipping' young women.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2010
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 27, 2010
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 31, 2010
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2010
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2011
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 3, 2020
CompletedApril 3, 2020
March 1, 2020
8 months
August 27, 2010
April 19, 2017
March 23, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Area Under the Curve (niAUC) of Perceived Hunger, Fullness, Desire to Eat, and Prospective Food Consumption
Computerized questionnaires, assessing perceived sensations of hunger and fullness were completed throughout the testing days beginning at baseline and about every 30 minutes for a total of 20 questionnaires (- 15 min, +0 min,+30 min, +60 min, +90 min, +120 min, +150 min, +180 min, +210 min, +240 min, +255 min, +270 min, +285 min, +300 min, +330 min, +360 min, +390 min, +420 min, +450 min, and +480 min). The questions are worded as "how strong is your feeling of" with anchors of "not at all" to "extremely." Each reported score can be a minimum of 0 and a maximum of 100 mm. niAUC was calculated by computing the summation of the average change from baseline score (mm) for each time point and the subsequent time point, multiplied by the difference in time (min) between the two measures. For reported feelings of hunger, a higher score can be interpreted as "feeling more hungry" throughout the day. This can be applied to the three other perceived sensations.
5 weeks
Area Under the Curve (AUC) of Plasma Total Ghrelin and Ln Peptide YY (PYY)
The samples were collected in test tubes containing ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid. Protease inhibitors (pefabloc SC and dipeptidyl peptidase) were added to some of the tubes to reduce protein degradation. The plasma was separated and stored in microcentrifuge tubes at -80°C for future analysis. Plasma total ghrelin and peptide YY (PYY) were measured for all time points using the Milliplex multi-analyte profiling magnetic bead-based multi-analyte, metabolic panel, 2-plex assay and Magpix Luminex technologies. AUC was calculated by computing the summation of the average change from baseline score (pg/ml) for each time point and the subsequent time point multiplied by the difference in time (min) between the two time instances for a total of 20 blood samples (- 15 min, +0 min,+30 min, +60 min, +90 min, +120 min, +150 min, +180 min, +210 min, +240 min, +255 min, +270 min, +285 min, +300 min, +330 min, +360 min, +390 min, +420 min, +450 min, and +480 min).
5 weeks
Brain Regions Displaying Differential Activation Prior to Dinner in Response to Food vs Nonfood Stimuli From Food Cue-stimulate fMRI Brain Scans
Participants viewed 3 categories of pictures including food, nonfood (animals), and blurred baseline images. The pictures from each category were presented in blocks of images. Animal pictures were used to control for visual richness and general interest (i.e., appealing but not appetizing). To determine the effects of breakfast/no breakfast on neural activity associated with food motivation, repeated measures ANOVAs were performed on the brain activation maps within the Brain Voyager software with use of stimulus \[food (i.e., appetizing and appealing) vs. nonfood (i.e., animal, nonappetizing but appealing\]. To identify significant activations in a priori regions, a cluster level statistical threshold was applied to correct for multiple comparisons. By using this approach, significance was set at P = 0.01, with a cluster-level false-positive rate of a = 0.05
5 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Daily Energy Intake
5 weeks
Study Arms (3)
Breakfast Skipping
EXPERIMENTALBreakfast skipping serves as the baseline/control arm since the participants habitually skip breakfast (i.e., skip breakfast at least 5 times/week). Thus, during the week prior to and including the testing day, the participants will continue to skip breakfast each morning.
Normal Protein Breakfast Meals
EXPERIMENTALFor 7 days, the participants will consume normal protein breakfast meals each morning. These meals will consist of cereal-based foods and will be 350 kcal, which is approximately 18% of daily energy intake for overweight and obese adolescents ages 9-18 y. The macronutrient composition of these meals will contain 15% protein (13 g of dietary protein), 65% CHO, and 20% fat.
Protein-rich Breakfast Meals
EXPERIMENTALFor 7 days, the participants will consume protein-rich breakfast meals each morning. These meals will consist of home-cooked foods and will be 350 kcal, which is approximately 18% of daily energy intake for overweight and obese adolescents ages 9-18 y. The macronutrient composition of these meals will contain 40% protein (35 g of protein), 40% CHO, and 20% fat.
Interventions
Participants will continue to skip breakfast each morning.
Participants will consume normal protein breakfast meals each morning.
Participants will consume protein-rich breakfast meals each morning.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Female
- Age range 15-20 y
- Overweight to obese (85th -99th percentile for BMI for age; BMI: 25-39.9 kg/m2
- No metabolic, psychological, or neurological diseases/conditions
- Not currently/previously on a weight loss/other special diet
- Frequently eats lunch ( ≥ 5 eating occasions/wk)
- Consistently skips breakfast every week day (i.e., 5 week days/week)
- Right-handed (necessary for the fMRI analyses)
You may not qualify if:
- Male
- Age \>20 y and \<15 y
- Under Weight (\<5th percentile for BMI for age; BMI: \<18 kg/m2)
- Normal Weight (6th-84th percentile for BMI for age; BMI: 18-24.0 kg/m2)
- Morbidly Obese (BMI: \>40 kg/m2)
- Clinically diagnosed with diabetes (Type I or Type II), having an eating disorder, or having any other metabolic, psychological, or neurological diseases/conditions that would influence the study outcomes.
- Not currently/previously on a weight loss or other special diet (in the past 6 months)
- Skip lunch ( ≥ 2 eating occasions/wk)
- Consume breakfast (≥ 2 eating occasions/wk)
- Left-handed
- Claustrophobic (≥ 2 past bouts of claustrophobia when exposure to small spaces)
- Do not meet the fMRI criteria established by the MU-BIC (regarding metal implants, etc.)
- Pregnant
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
University of Missouri
Columbia, Missouri, 65211, United States
Related Publications (1)
Leidy HJ, Ortinau LC, Douglas SM, Hoertel HA. Beneficial effects of a higher-protein breakfast on the appetitive, hormonal, and neural signals controlling energy intake regulation in overweight/obese, "breakfast-skipping," late-adolescent girls. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Apr;97(4):677-88. doi: 10.3945/ajcn.112.053116. Epub 2013 Feb 27.
PMID: 23446906DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Heather Leidy
- Organization
- Purdue University
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Heather J Leidy, PhD
University of Missouri-Columbia
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 27, 2010
First Posted
August 31, 2010
Study Start
September 1, 2010
Primary Completion
May 1, 2011
Study Completion
August 1, 2011
Last Updated
April 3, 2020
Results First Posted
April 3, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share