Study Stopped
This clinical trial was terminated early, due to slow recruitment and study drug shortages.
Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking WHO Step III Analgesics But Showing a Lack of Tolerability
An Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride Prolonged Release, and Tapentadol Hydrochloride Immediate Release on Demand, in Subjects With Severe Chronic Nociceptive, Mixed or Neuropathic Low Back Pain Taking WHO Step III Analgesics But Showing a Lack of Tolerability
3 other identifiers
interventional
136
8 countries
27
Brief Summary
The main objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of tapentadol hydrochloride prolonged release in subjects suffering from severe chronic low back pain (LBP) who are taking WHO Step III analgesics and show lack of tolerability. This is a clinical effectiveness trial designed to establish a link between anticipated clinical outcomes and the clinical practice by means of selected measures of clinical and subject-reported outcome. The trial will compare the effectiveness of previous analgesic treatment (WHO Step III) with that of tapentadol hydrochloride prolonged release treatment during defined periods of evaluation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 pain
Started Oct 2009
27 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 28, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 29, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
October 30, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2011
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
March 18, 2013
CompletedJanuary 9, 2019
December 1, 2018
1.1 years
September 28, 2009
May 31, 2012
December 20, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of Participants That Responded to Treatment
Participants were considered responders if they reported the same or less average pain intensity over a 3 day period (NRS-3) after 6 weeks of tapentadol prolonged release treatment compared to their previous analgesic treatment (over a 3 day period on the Numeric Rating Scale) at Week 6 compared with Week-1.
6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (18)
Average Pain Intensity Before the Start of Tapentadol Treatment
Baseline
Change in Average Pain Intensity After 6 Weeks of Tapentadol Prolonged Release Treatment.
Baseline; End of Week 6 (6 weeks)
Change in Average Pain Intensity After 12 Weeks of Tapentadol Prolonged Release Treatment.
Baseline; End of Week 12 (12 weeks)
Patient Global Impression of Change
Baseline; End of Week 6 (6 Weeks)
Patient Global Impression of Change
Baseline; End of Week 12 (12 Weeks)
- +13 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Tapentadol Prolonged Release
EXPERIMENTALOther Names: * Nucynta * Palexia
Interventions
Participants started with 50 mg, 100 mg or 150 mg tapentadol prolonged release (PR) twice daily. Opioid rotation to tapentadol was scheduled as follows: * if less than 100 mg morphine equivalent start with 50 mg tapentadol PR; * if on 101 to 160 mg morphine equivalent daily dose start with 100 mg tapentadol PR; * if above 161 mg morphine equivalent daily dose start with 150 mg tapentadol PR. Tapentadol doses were adjusted to a level that provided adequate analgesia (upwards or downwards on a weekly basis). After 5 weeks, the doses of tapentadol PR were kept stable (start of Maintenance phase). The tapentadol PR formulation was administered for up to 12 weeks. Tapentadol immediate release 50 mg (no more than twice daily; at least 4 hours apart) was considered as medication for acute pain episodes however, participants were not permitted to dose tapentadol immediate release any more when a daily dose of 500 mg tapentadol PR was reached.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants must have signed an Informed Consent Form indicating that they understand the purpose of and procedures required for the trial and are willing to participate in it.
- Participants are men or non-pregnant, non-lactating women. Sexually active women must be postmenopausal, surgically sterile, or practicing an effective method of birth control (e.g., prescription oral contraceptives, contraceptive injections, intrauterine device, double barrier method, contraceptive patch, male partner sterilization) before entry and throughout the trial. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at screening.
- Participants must be appropriately communicative to verbalize and to differentiate with regard to location and intensity of the pain.
- Participants must be at least 18 years of age.
- Participants must have a diagnosis of chronic low back pain; chronic pain defined as pain lasting for at least 3 months
- If the Participant has radicular pain, this must have been present for at least 3 months and stable for the 4 weeks before enrollment.
- Participant's pain must require a strong analgesic (defined as WHO Step III) as judged by the Investigator.
- Participants must be taking a WHO Step III analgesic on a daily basis for at least 3 months prior to the Screening Visit.
- Participants must have responded to the WHO Step III analgesic, i.e., participants must have a confirmed average pain intensity score (NRS 3) of ≤5 points during the last 3 days prior to the Screening Visit.
- Participants must report opioid-related side effects as the reason to change their analgesic.
- Participants must report a rate of satisfaction with their previous analgesic regimen not exceeding "fair" on a subject satisfaction with treatment scale (5-point VRS).
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of a clinically significant disease or laboratory findings that in the Investigator's opinion may affect efficacy or safety assessments.
- Presence of active systemic or local infection that may, in the opinion of the Investigator, affect the efficacy, quality of life/function or safety assessments.
- History of alcohol or drug abuse, or suspicion of in Investigator's judgement.
- Presence of concomitant autoimmune inflammatory conditions.
- Known history of or laboratory values reflecting severe renal impairment.
- Known history of moderately or severely impaired hepatic function.
- History of or active hepatitis B or C within the past 3 months or history of HIV infection.
- History of seizure disorder or epilepsy.
- Any of the following within 1 year: mild/moderate traumatic brain injury, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or brain neoplasm. Severe traumatic brain injury within 15 years (consisting of 1 or more of the following: brain contusion, intracranial hematoma, either unconsciousness or post traumatic amnesia lasting more than 24 h) or residual sequelae suggesting transient changes in consciousness.
- Pregnant or breast-feeding.
- History of allergy to, or hypersensitivity to tapentadol hydrochloride or its excipients, or contraindications related to tapentadol hydrochloride including:
- Subjects with acute or severe bronchial asthma or hypercapnia.
- Subjects who have or are suspected of having paralytic ileus.
- Employees of the Investigator or trial site, with direct involvement in this trial or other trials under the direction of the Investigator or trial site, as well as family members of employees of the Investigator.
- Participation in another trial concurrently or within 4 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.
- +6 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Grünenthal GmbHlead
Study Sites (27)
BE004
Bruges, Belgium
BE003
Charleroi, Belgium
BE002
Edegem, Belgium
BE001
Liège, Belgium
CZ001
Brno, Czechia
FR004
Thionville, France
FR001
Toulouse, France
DE005
Albstadt, Germany
DE001
Berlin, Germany
DE003
Berlin, Germany
DE006
Kiel, Germany
DE004
Leipzig, Germany
DE008
Leipzig, Germany
DE007
Stuttgart, Germany
NL002
Alkmaar, Netherlands
NL004
Doetinchem, Netherlands
NL003
Eindhoven, Netherlands
NL001
Tiel, Netherlands
PL002
Krakow, Poland
PL001
Poznan, Poland
ES006
Cadiz, Spain
ES001
Granada, Spain
ES003
Málaga, Spain
ES004
Seville, Spain
ES005
Valencia, Spain
CH001
Basel, Switzerland
CH002
Sankt Gallen, Switzerland
Related Publications (1)
Galvez R, Schafer M, Hans G, Falke D, Steigerwald I. Tapentadol prolonged release versus strong opioids for severe, chronic low back pain: results of an open-label, phase 3b study. Adv Ther. 2013 Mar;30(3):229-59. doi: 10.1007/s12325-013-0015-6. Epub 2013 Mar 7.
PMID: 23475406RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
The results of this trial have to be interpreted under the consideration that it was an open-label trial which was prematurely terminated.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director of Clinical Trials
- Organization
- Grünenthal GmbH
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael Schäfer, Prof. MD
Charité University Berlin, Campus Virchow Klinikum
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 28, 2009
First Posted
September 29, 2009
Study Start
October 30, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2010
Study Completion
January 1, 2011
Last Updated
January 9, 2019
Results First Posted
March 18, 2013
Record last verified: 2018-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
Information available on the Grünenthal Web Site.