Evaluation of Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics
An Evaluation of the Effectiveness and Tolerability of Tapentadol Hydrochloride Prolonged Release, and Tapentadol Hydrochloride Immediate Release on Demand, in Subjects With Uncontrolled Severe Chronic Nociceptive, Mixed or Neuropathic Low Back Pain Taking Either WHO Step I or Step II Analgesics or no Regular Analgesics.
3 other identifiers
interventional
208
9 countries
46
Brief Summary
The main objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of tapentadol hydrochloride prolonged release in subjects suffering from severe chronic low back pain (LBP) who are taking either WHO Step I or Step II analgesics or no regular analgesics. This is a clinical effectiveness trial designed to establish a link between anticipated clinical outcomes and the clinical practice by means of selected measures of clinical and subject-reported outcome. The trial will compare the effectiveness of previous analgesic treatment (either WHO Step I or Step II analgesics or no regular analgesics) with that of tapentadol hydrochloride prolonged release (PR) treatment during defined periods of evaluation.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 chronic-pain
Started Sep 2009
Shorter than P25 for phase_3 chronic-pain
46 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 23, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 24, 2009
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 30, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 6, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 17, 2012
CompletedJanuary 15, 2019
December 1, 2018
7 months
September 23, 2009
August 2, 2011
December 18, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The Primary Endpoint is Defined as the Change of the Average Pain Intensity Score on an 11-point NRS-3 at Week 6 From Week -1 (Baseline).
For this pain assessment, the participant was to indicate the level of average pain experienced over the previous 3 days on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine". The value indicates the change from the baseline participant assessment on the 0 to 10 scale. A negative value indicates a reduction in pain intensity.
Baseline; End of Week 6 (6 Weeks)
Secondary Outcomes (35)
Patient Global Impression of Change at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period
Baseline; End of Week 6 (6 Weeks)
Patient Global Impression of Change at End of the Maintenance Period
Baseline; End of Week 12 (12 weeks)
Change in the Health Survey Scores Form (SF-36) at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period
Baseline; End of Week 6 (6 weeks)
Change in the Health Survey Scores Form (SF-36) at End of Maintenance Period
Baseline; End of Week 12 (12 weeks)
painDETECT Assessment at Baseline
Baseline
- +30 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (1)
Tapentadol
EXPERIMENTALTapentadol PR was given orally twice a day. A maximum of 2 oral Tapentadol immediate release (IR) tablets per day, with a minimum of a 4 hour interval between doses, were taken if there were acute pain episodes. The total daily dose of Tapentadol PR and IR were not permitted to exceed 500 mg per day.
Interventions
Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) Titration and Optimal Dose Period: Starting at 50 mg Tapentadol PR twice daily, adjusted with 50 mg PR steps (upwards or downwards) as necessary to achieve a balance between pain relief and a satisfactory level of tolerability. Participants were not permitted to exceed a dose of 500 mg of Tapentadol per day.
Eligibility assessment period to characterize the baseline over a one week period (week -1). Participants continued their previous treatment prior to allocation to tapentadol, if eligible.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Participants must have signed an Informed Consent Form.
- Participants were men or non-pregnant, non-lactating women. Female participants must be postmenopausal, surgically sterile, or practicing an effective method of birth control. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at screening.
- Participants must be appropriately communicative to verbalize and to differentiate with regard to location and intensity of the pain.
- Participants must be at least 18 years of age.
- Participants must have a diagnosis of chronic low back pain; chronic pain defined as pain lasting for at least 3 months.
- If the participant has radicular pain, this must have been present for at least 3 months and stable for the 4 weeks before enrollment.
- Participants's pain must require a strong analgesic (defined as WHO Step III) as judged by the Investigator.
- Participants must report a rate of satisfaction with their previous analgesic regimen not exceeding "fair" on a subject satisfaction with treatment scale (5-point VRS).
- If under regular, daily pretreatment:
- Participants must be taking a WHO Step I or Step II analgesic medication on a daily basis for at least 2 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.
- The Investigator considers dose increase of WHO Step I analgesics (as mono- or combination therapy) and/or continuation with or dose increase of WHO Step II analgesics inadequate for the individual participant, whatever applicable.
- Participants must have an average pain intensity score (NRS 3) greater than 5 points during the last 3 days prior to the Screening Visit. or
- If no regular analgesic pretreatment is reported:
- Participants must have an average pain intensity score (NRS-3) greater than 6 points in the last 3 days prior to the Screening Visit and related to low back pain.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of a clinically significant disease or laboratory findings that in the Investigator's opinion may affect efficacy or safety assessments.
- Presence of active systemic or local infection that may, in the opinion of the Investigator, affect the efficacy, quality of life/function or safety assessments.
- History of alcohol or drug abuse, or suspicion of in Investigator's judgement.
- Presence of concomitant autoimmune inflammatory conditions.
- Known history of or laboratory values reflecting severe renal impairment.
- Known history of moderately or severely impaired hepatic function.
- History of or active hepatitis B or C within the past 3 months or history of HIV infection
- History of seizure disorder or epilepsy.
- Any of the following within 1 year: mild/moderate traumatic brain injury, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or brain neoplasm. Severe traumatic brain injury within 15 years (consisting of 1 or more of the following: brain contusion, intracranial hematoma, either unconsciousness or post-traumatic amnesia lasting more than 24 h) or residual sequelae suggesting transient changes in consciousness.
- Pregnant or breast-feeding.
- History of allergy to, or hypersensitivity to tapentadol hydrochloride or its excipients, or contraindications related to tapentadol hydrochloride including:
- Participants with acute or severe bronchial asthma or hypercapnia.
- Participants who have or are suspected of having paralytic ileus.
- Employees of the Investigator or trial site, with direct involvement in this trial or other trials under the direction of the Investigator or trial site, as well as family members of employees of the Investigator.
- Participation in another trial concurrently or within 4 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.
- +8 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Grünenthal GmbHlead
Study Sites (46)
Site 5
Graz, Austria
Site 1
Vienna, Austria
Site 2
Vienna, Austria
Site 3
Vienna, Austria
Site 4
Vienna, Austria
Site 3
Karlovac, Croatia
Site 2
Opatija, Croatia
Site 1
Sisak, Croatia
Site 2
Châteaugiron, France
Site 4
La Seyne-sur-Mer, France
Site 3
Murs Erigné, France
Site 1
Paris, France
Site 3
Berlin, Germany
Site 7
Böblingen, Germany
Site 4
Celle, Germany
Site 1
Dresden, Germany
Site 6
Hanover, Germany
Site 8
Leipzig, Germany
Site 5
Lünen, Germany
Site 2
Wiesbaden, Germany
Site 6
Bologna, Italy
Site 5
Catania, Italy
Site 2
Genova, Italy
Site 4
Parma, Italy
Site 3
Pavia, Italy
Site 1
Rome, Italy
Site 1
Lublin, Poland
Site 4
Tychy, Poland
Site 3
Wroclaw, Poland
Site 5
Alicante, Spain
Site 1
Badalona, Spain
Site 7
Guadalajara, Spain
Site 6
Madrid, Spain
Site 4
Oviedo, Spain
Site 8
Pamplona, Spain
Site 3
Valencia, Spain
Site 1
Morges, Switzerland
Site 2
Valens, Switzerland
Site 7
Belfast, United Kingdom
Site 2
Bristol, United Kingdom
Site 8
Chelmsford, United Kingdom
Site 6
Edinburgh, United Kingdom
Site 1
Glasgow, United Kingdom
Site 4
London, United Kingdom
Site 5
London, United Kingdom
Site 3
Plymouth, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Steigerwald I, Muller M, Davies A, Samper D, Sabatowski R, Baron R, Rozenberg S, Szczepanska-Szerej A, Gatti A, Kress HG. Effectiveness and safety of tapentadol prolonged release for severe, chronic low back pain with or without a neuropathic pain component: results of an open-label, phase 3b study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jun;28(6):911-36. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.679254. Epub 2012 May 9.
PMID: 22443293RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director of Clinical Trials
- Organization
- Grünenthal GmbH
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Hans Kress, Prof. MD
Medical University / AKH Vienna
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 23, 2009
First Posted
September 24, 2009
Study Start
September 30, 2009
Primary Completion
May 1, 2010
Study Completion
July 6, 2010
Last Updated
January 15, 2019
Results First Posted
April 17, 2012
Record last verified: 2018-12
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
Information available on the Grünenthal Web Site