NCT00983385

Brief Summary

The main objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness, tolerability, and safety of tapentadol hydrochloride prolonged release in subjects suffering from severe chronic low back pain (LBP) who are taking either WHO Step I or Step II analgesics or no regular analgesics. This is a clinical effectiveness trial designed to establish a link between anticipated clinical outcomes and the clinical practice by means of selected measures of clinical and subject-reported outcome. The trial will compare the effectiveness of previous analgesic treatment (either WHO Step I or Step II analgesics or no regular analgesics) with that of tapentadol hydrochloride prolonged release (PR) treatment during defined periods of evaluation.

Trial Health

93
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
208

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_3 chronic-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2009

Shorter than P25 for phase_3 chronic-pain

Geographic Reach
9 countries

46 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 23, 2009

Completed
1 day until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 24, 2009

Completed
6 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 30, 2009

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2010

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 6, 2010

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

April 17, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

January 15, 2019

Status Verified

December 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

September 23, 2009

Results QC Date

August 2, 2011

Last Update Submit

December 18, 2018

Conditions

Keywords

low back painpainassessmenttapentadolcentrally acting analgesic

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • The Primary Endpoint is Defined as the Change of the Average Pain Intensity Score on an 11-point NRS-3 at Week 6 From Week -1 (Baseline).

    For this pain assessment, the participant was to indicate the level of average pain experienced over the previous 3 days on an 11-point Numerical Rating Scale(NRS) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine". The value indicates the change from the baseline participant assessment on the 0 to 10 scale. A negative value indicates a reduction in pain intensity.

    Baseline; End of Week 6 (6 Weeks)

Secondary Outcomes (35)

  • Patient Global Impression of Change at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period

    Baseline; End of Week 6 (6 Weeks)

  • Patient Global Impression of Change at End of the Maintenance Period

    Baseline; End of Week 12 (12 weeks)

  • Change in the Health Survey Scores Form (SF-36) at End of Titration and Optimal Dose Period

    Baseline; End of Week 6 (6 weeks)

  • Change in the Health Survey Scores Form (SF-36) at End of Maintenance Period

    Baseline; End of Week 12 (12 weeks)

  • painDETECT Assessment at Baseline

    Baseline

  • +30 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (1)

Tapentadol

EXPERIMENTAL

Tapentadol PR was given orally twice a day. A maximum of 2 oral Tapentadol immediate release (IR) tablets per day, with a minimum of a 4 hour interval between doses, were taken if there were acute pain episodes. The total daily dose of Tapentadol PR and IR were not permitted to exceed 500 mg per day.

Drug: Tapentadol PROther: Observation period

Interventions

Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) Titration and Optimal Dose Period: Starting at 50 mg Tapentadol PR twice daily, adjusted with 50 mg PR steps (upwards or downwards) as necessary to achieve a balance between pain relief and a satisfactory level of tolerability. Participants were not permitted to exceed a dose of 500 mg of Tapentadol per day.

Also known as: Palexia®, Nucynta®
Tapentadol

Eligibility assessment period to characterize the baseline over a one week period (week -1). Participants continued their previous treatment prior to allocation to tapentadol, if eligible.

Tapentadol

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Participants must have signed an Informed Consent Form.
  • Participants were men or non-pregnant, non-lactating women. Female participants must be postmenopausal, surgically sterile, or practicing an effective method of birth control. Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at screening.
  • Participants must be appropriately communicative to verbalize and to differentiate with regard to location and intensity of the pain.
  • Participants must be at least 18 years of age.
  • Participants must have a diagnosis of chronic low back pain; chronic pain defined as pain lasting for at least 3 months.
  • If the participant has radicular pain, this must have been present for at least 3 months and stable for the 4 weeks before enrollment.
  • Participants's pain must require a strong analgesic (defined as WHO Step III) as judged by the Investigator.
  • Participants must report a rate of satisfaction with their previous analgesic regimen not exceeding "fair" on a subject satisfaction with treatment scale (5-point VRS).
  • If under regular, daily pretreatment:
  • Participants must be taking a WHO Step I or Step II analgesic medication on a daily basis for at least 2 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.
  • The Investigator considers dose increase of WHO Step I analgesics (as mono- or combination therapy) and/or continuation with or dose increase of WHO Step II analgesics inadequate for the individual participant, whatever applicable.
  • Participants must have an average pain intensity score (NRS 3) greater than 5 points during the last 3 days prior to the Screening Visit. or
  • If no regular analgesic pretreatment is reported:
  • Participants must have an average pain intensity score (NRS-3) greater than 6 points in the last 3 days prior to the Screening Visit and related to low back pain.

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of a clinically significant disease or laboratory findings that in the Investigator's opinion may affect efficacy or safety assessments.
  • Presence of active systemic or local infection that may, in the opinion of the Investigator, affect the efficacy, quality of life/function or safety assessments.
  • History of alcohol or drug abuse, or suspicion of in Investigator's judgement.
  • Presence of concomitant autoimmune inflammatory conditions.
  • Known history of or laboratory values reflecting severe renal impairment.
  • Known history of moderately or severely impaired hepatic function.
  • History of or active hepatitis B or C within the past 3 months or history of HIV infection
  • History of seizure disorder or epilepsy.
  • Any of the following within 1 year: mild/moderate traumatic brain injury, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or brain neoplasm. Severe traumatic brain injury within 15 years (consisting of 1 or more of the following: brain contusion, intracranial hematoma, either unconsciousness or post-traumatic amnesia lasting more than 24 h) or residual sequelae suggesting transient changes in consciousness.
  • Pregnant or breast-feeding.
  • History of allergy to, or hypersensitivity to tapentadol hydrochloride or its excipients, or contraindications related to tapentadol hydrochloride including:
  • Participants with acute or severe bronchial asthma or hypercapnia.
  • Participants who have or are suspected of having paralytic ileus.
  • Employees of the Investigator or trial site, with direct involvement in this trial or other trials under the direction of the Investigator or trial site, as well as family members of employees of the Investigator.
  • Participation in another trial concurrently or within 4 weeks prior to the Screening Visit.
  • +8 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (46)

Site 5

Graz, Austria

Location

Site 1

Vienna, Austria

Location

Site 2

Vienna, Austria

Location

Site 3

Vienna, Austria

Location

Site 4

Vienna, Austria

Location

Site 3

Karlovac, Croatia

Location

Site 2

Opatija, Croatia

Location

Site 1

Sisak, Croatia

Location

Site 2

Châteaugiron, France

Location

Site 4

La Seyne-sur-Mer, France

Location

Site 3

Murs Erigné, France

Location

Site 1

Paris, France

Location

Site 3

Berlin, Germany

Location

Site 7

Böblingen, Germany

Location

Site 4

Celle, Germany

Location

Site 1

Dresden, Germany

Location

Site 6

Hanover, Germany

Location

Site 8

Leipzig, Germany

Location

Site 5

Lünen, Germany

Location

Site 2

Wiesbaden, Germany

Location

Site 6

Bologna, Italy

Location

Site 5

Catania, Italy

Location

Site 2

Genova, Italy

Location

Site 4

Parma, Italy

Location

Site 3

Pavia, Italy

Location

Site 1

Rome, Italy

Location

Site 1

Lublin, Poland

Location

Site 4

Tychy, Poland

Location

Site 3

Wroclaw, Poland

Location

Site 5

Alicante, Spain

Location

Site 1

Badalona, Spain

Location

Site 7

Guadalajara, Spain

Location

Site 6

Madrid, Spain

Location

Site 4

Oviedo, Spain

Location

Site 8

Pamplona, Spain

Location

Site 3

Valencia, Spain

Location

Site 1

Morges, Switzerland

Location

Site 2

Valens, Switzerland

Location

Site 7

Belfast, United Kingdom

Location

Site 2

Bristol, United Kingdom

Location

Site 8

Chelmsford, United Kingdom

Location

Site 6

Edinburgh, United Kingdom

Location

Site 1

Glasgow, United Kingdom

Location

Site 4

London, United Kingdom

Location

Site 5

London, United Kingdom

Location

Site 3

Plymouth, United Kingdom

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Steigerwald I, Muller M, Davies A, Samper D, Sabatowski R, Baron R, Rozenberg S, Szczepanska-Szerej A, Gatti A, Kress HG. Effectiveness and safety of tapentadol prolonged release for severe, chronic low back pain with or without a neuropathic pain component: results of an open-label, phase 3b study. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Jun;28(6):911-36. doi: 10.1185/03007995.2012.679254. Epub 2012 May 9.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Chronic PainLow Back PainPain

Interventions

Tapentadol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBack Pain

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic Chemicals

Results Point of Contact

Title
Director of Clinical Trials
Organization
Grünenthal GmbH

Study Officials

  • Hans Kress, Prof. MD

    Medical University / AKH Vienna

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
NA
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 23, 2009

First Posted

September 24, 2009

Study Start

September 30, 2009

Primary Completion

May 1, 2010

Study Completion

July 6, 2010

Last Updated

January 15, 2019

Results First Posted

April 17, 2012

Record last verified: 2018-12

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Information available on the Grünenthal Web Site

Shared Documents
STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, CSR
More information

Locations