NCT01352741

Brief Summary

The main objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of increasing doses of tapentadol prolonged release (PR) (500 mg per day) versus a combination of tapentadol PR (300 mg per day) and pregabalin (to 300 mg per day) in subjects requiring additional analgesia after titration to tapentadol PR 300 mg per day. This is a clinical effectiveness trial designed to establish a link between anticipated clinical outcomes and the clinical practice by means of selected measures of clinical and subject reported outcomes. Since, severe low back pain with a neuropathic component, the targeted study population, is frequently treated with a combination therapy (monotherapy is often not effective enough) it is of interest to determine if tapentadol alone (combining 2 mechanisms of action in a single molecule) could be as effective as a combination of tapentadol plus pregabalin. Furthermore, the tolerability profiles of monotherapy versus combination are of interest.

Trial Health

93
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
622

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4 low-back-pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2011

Shorter than P25 for phase_4 low-back-pain

Geographic Reach
7 countries

59 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 1, 2011

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 12, 2011

Completed
1 month until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 12, 2011

Completed
8 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2012

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

January 1, 2012

Completed
4.6 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

August 12, 2016

Completed
Last Updated

October 28, 2019

Status Verified

October 1, 2019

Enrollment Period

10 months

First QC Date

April 12, 2011

Results QC Date

May 10, 2016

Last Update Submit

October 9, 2019

Conditions

Keywords

low back painneuropathicpain assessmentcentrally acting tapentadol pregabalinsevere chronic

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Change in the Average Pain Intensity Score for the Overall Low Back Pain on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-3)

    The primary endpoint is defined as the comparison of tapentadol prolonged release (PR) 300 mg plus 200 mg per day and the combination of tapentadol PR 300 mg per day and pregabalin 300 mg per day regarding the change in NRS-3 pain intensity scores (recalled average pain intensity score during the last 3 days on 11-point NRS, where 0 is the no pain and 10 is pain as bad as you can imagine) from the randomization visit to the final evaluation visit. Theoretically a maximum decrease of -10 and an increase of +4 in the pain intensity would have been possible. A negative sign indicates a decrease in pain intensity from the start of treatment. The higher the absolute values, the greater the change since the start of treatment (Baseline visit).

    Randomization (Day 22); Final Evaluation Visit (Day 77)

Secondary Outcomes (43)

  • Open-label Titration Period: Average Pain Intensity Score for the Overall Low Back Pain on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-3)

    Enrollment (Day -14); Baseline Visit (Day 1); Randomization Visit (Day 22)

  • Open-label Continuation Period: Average Pain Intensity Score for the Overall Low Back Pain on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-3)

    Enrollment (Day -14); Baseline Visit (Day 1); Randomization Visit (Day 22); Final Evaluation Visit (Day 77)

  • End of Open-label Pick-up Period: Average Pain Intensity Score for the Overall Low Back Pain on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-3)

    Final Evaluation Visit (Day 77)

  • Open-label Titration Period: Radiating Pain

    Enrollment Visit (Day -14); Baseline Visit (Day 1); Randomization Visit (Day 22)

  • Open-label Titration Period: Radiating Mean Pain Intensity Score for the Comparative Period Population

    Enrollment Visit (Day -14); Baseline Visit (Day 1); Randomization Visit (Day 22)

  • +38 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Tapentadol Prolonged Release

EXPERIMENTAL

Tapentadol Prolonged Release (100 - 500 mg per day) Oral administration twice daily

Drug: Tapentadol Prolonged ReleaseDrug: Tapentadol Prolonged Release open label maintenance

Tapentadol Prolonged Release with Pregabalin

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Tapentadol Prolonged Release (100 - 300 mg per day) with Pregabalin (150 - 300 mg per day) Both administered orally twice a day.

Drug: Tapentadol Prolonged Release with PregabalinDrug: Tapentadol Prolonged Release open label maintenance

Interventions

100 - 500 mg per day orally twice daily for a maximum of 12 weeks

Tapentadol Prolonged Release

Tapentadol Prolonged Release 100 - 300 mg per day with Pregabalin 150 - 300 mg per day orally twice daily for a maximum of 12 weeks

Tapentadol Prolonged Release with Pregabalin

100 - 400 mg per day Tapentadol Prolonged Release orally administered twice daily

Tapentadol Prolonged ReleaseTapentadol Prolonged Release with Pregabalin

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects must have a diagnosis of chronic low back pain; chronic pain defined as pain lasting for at least 3 months.
  • Subject's pain must require a strong analgesic (defined as World Health Organization (WHO) step III) as judged by the investigator.
  • The painDETECT diagnostic screening questionnaire score must be:
  • "positive" or
  • "unclear".or If the subject is being treated with a stable regimen of centrally acting analgesics (opioids) and/or co-analgesics, even a "negative" painDETECT score (but of at least 9) at the enrollment visit will be acceptable.
  • If under regular daily pretreatment with a WHO step II/step III opioid analgesic and/or a centrally acting co-analgesic:
  • Subjects must be taking a WHO step II or step III analgesic or co- analgesic on a daily basis for at least 2 weeks prior to the enrollment visit.
  • Subjects pretreated with a WHO step II opioid analgesic and/or a centrally acting co-analgesic must have reported an average pain intensity score of at least 5 points (NRS-3≥5) during the last 3 days prior to the enrollment visit. or If under regular, daily pretreatment with a WHO step I analgesic monotherapy or if no regular analgesic pretreatment is reported:
  • Subjects must have an average pain intensity score of at least 6 points NRS-3≥6) in the last 3 days prior to the enrollment visit.

You may not qualify if:

  • Presence of concomitant painful conditions other than low back pain that could confound the subject's trial assessments or self-evaluation of the index pain, e.g., syndromes with widespread pain such as fibromyalgia.
  • Low back pain caused by cancer and/or metastatic diseases.
  • Any painful procedures planned during the trial period (e.g., major surgery) that may, in the opinion of the investigator, affect the effectiveness or safety assessments of the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP).
  • Pending litigation or application for insurance/governmental benefits due to chronic pain or disability and, if granted, benefits might be influenced by a successful participation in the trial.
  • Rare hereditary problems of galactose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency, or glucose-galactose malabsorption, lactose intolerance.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (59)

Site 506

Klagenfurt, Austria

Location

Site 503

Senftenberg, Austria

Location

Site 501

Vienna, Austria

Location

Site 502

Vienna, Austria

Location

Site 504

Vienna, Austria

Location

Site 505

Vienna, Austria

Location

Site 605

Dour, Belgium

Location

Site 602

Genk, Belgium

Location

Site 603

Gozée, Belgium

Location

Site 604

Ham, Belgium

Location

Site 601

Pellenberg, Belgium

Location

Site 702

Copenhagen, Denmark

Location

Site 704

Frederiksberg, Denmark

Location

Site 701

Glostrup Municipality, Denmark

Location

Site 703

Ringsted, Denmark

Location

DE 118

Berlin, 10787, Germany

Location

Site 107

Berlin, Germany

Location

Site 111

Böhlen, Germany

Location

Site 105

Cologne, Germany

Location

Site 116

Cologne, Germany

Location

Site 115

Cottbus, Germany

Location

Site 103

Hamburg, Germany

Location

Site 110

Hamburg, Germany

Location

Site 101

Kiel, Germany

Location

Site 114

Kiel, Germany

Location

Site 113

Leipzig, Germany

Location

Site 109

Lübeck, Germany

Location

Site 106

Rendsburg, Germany

Location

Site 108

Schönau, Germany

Location

Site 117

Weimar, Germany

Location

Site 112

Westerstede, Germany

Location

Site 104

Wiesbaden, Germany

Location

Site 803

Amsterdam, Netherlands

Location

Site 804

Eindhoven, Netherlands

Location

Site 805

Enschede, Netherlands

Location

Site 802

Heerenveen, Netherlands

Location

Site 801

Sliedrecht, Netherlands

Location

Site 309

Bydgoszcz, Poland

Location

Site 312

Gdansk, Poland

Location

Site 303

Katowice, Poland

Location

Site 308

Krakow, Poland

Location

Site 310

Krakow, Poland

Location

Site 311

Krakow, Poland

Location

Site 307

Lublin, Poland

Location

Site 306

Ostrów Mazowiecka, Poland

Location

Site 304

Poznan, Poland

Location

Site 301

Warsaw, Poland

Location

Site 302

Warsaw, Poland

Location

Site 305

Wroclaw, Poland

Location

Site 904

A Coruña, Spain

Location

Site 908

Alicante, Spain

Location

Site 901

Badalona, Spain

Location

Site 905

Barcelona, Spain

Location

Site 902

Centelles, Spain

Location

Site 907

Granada, Spain

Location

Site 909

Madrid, Spain

Location

Site 910

Madrid, Spain

Location

Site 903

Oviedo, Spain

Location

Site 911

Valencia, Spain

Location

Related Publications (2)

  • Baron R, Martin-Mola E, Muller M, Dubois C, Falke D, Steigerwald I. Effectiveness and Safety of Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) Versus a Combination of Tapentadol PR and Pregabalin for the Management of Severe, Chronic Low Back Pain With a Neuropathic Component: A Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3b Study. Pain Pract. 2015 Jun;15(5):455-70. doi: 10.1111/papr.12200. Epub 2014 Apr 17.

  • Baron R, Kern U, Muller M, Dubois C, Falke D, Steigerwald I. Effectiveness and Tolerability of a Moderate Dose of Tapentadol Prolonged Release for Managing Severe, Chronic Low Back Pain with a Neuropathic Component: An Open-label Continuation Arm of a Randomized Phase 3b Study. Pain Pract. 2015 Jun;15(5):471-86. doi: 10.1111/papr.12199. Epub 2014 Apr 18.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Low Back PainNeuralgiaBronchiolitis Obliterans Syndrome

Interventions

Pregabalin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Back PainPainNeurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesOrganizing PneumoniaBronchiolitis ObliteransBronchiolitisBronchitisBronchial DiseasesRespiratory Tract DiseasesLung Diseases, ObstructiveLung DiseasesGraft vs Host DiseaseImmune System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

gamma-Aminobutyric AcidAminobutyratesButyratesAcids, AcyclicCarboxylic AcidsOrganic ChemicalsAmino AcidsAmino Acids, Peptides, and Proteins

Results Point of Contact

Title
Director of Clinical Trials
Organization
Grünenthal GmbH

Study Officials

  • Ralf Baron, Prof. Dr.

    Neurological pain research and therapy Clinic for Neurology Campus Kiel, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Schittenhelmstr. 10, 24105 Kiel, Germany

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 12, 2011

First Posted

May 12, 2011

Study Start

March 1, 2011

Primary Completion

January 1, 2012

Study Completion

January 1, 2012

Last Updated

October 28, 2019

Results First Posted

August 12, 2016

Record last verified: 2019-10

Locations