Comparison of Increasing Doses of Tapentadol Versus a Combination of Tapentadol and Pregabalin
Evaluation of the Effectiveness, Safety, and Tolerability of Tapentadol PR Versus a Combination of Tapentadol PR and Pregabalin in Subjects With Severe Chronic Low Back Pain With a Neuropathic Pain Component
3 other identifiers
interventional
622
7 countries
59
Brief Summary
The main objective of the study is to evaluate the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of increasing doses of tapentadol prolonged release (PR) (500 mg per day) versus a combination of tapentadol PR (300 mg per day) and pregabalin (to 300 mg per day) in subjects requiring additional analgesia after titration to tapentadol PR 300 mg per day. This is a clinical effectiveness trial designed to establish a link between anticipated clinical outcomes and the clinical practice by means of selected measures of clinical and subject reported outcomes. Since, severe low back pain with a neuropathic component, the targeted study population, is frequently treated with a combination therapy (monotherapy is often not effective enough) it is of interest to determine if tapentadol alone (combining 2 mechanisms of action in a single molecule) could be as effective as a combination of tapentadol plus pregabalin. Furthermore, the tolerability profiles of monotherapy versus combination are of interest.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4 low-back-pain
Started Mar 2011
Shorter than P25 for phase_4 low-back-pain
59 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2011
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 12, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 12, 2011
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2012
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 12, 2016
CompletedOctober 28, 2019
October 1, 2019
10 months
April 12, 2011
May 10, 2016
October 9, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in the Average Pain Intensity Score for the Overall Low Back Pain on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-3)
The primary endpoint is defined as the comparison of tapentadol prolonged release (PR) 300 mg plus 200 mg per day and the combination of tapentadol PR 300 mg per day and pregabalin 300 mg per day regarding the change in NRS-3 pain intensity scores (recalled average pain intensity score during the last 3 days on 11-point NRS, where 0 is the no pain and 10 is pain as bad as you can imagine) from the randomization visit to the final evaluation visit. Theoretically a maximum decrease of -10 and an increase of +4 in the pain intensity would have been possible. A negative sign indicates a decrease in pain intensity from the start of treatment. The higher the absolute values, the greater the change since the start of treatment (Baseline visit).
Randomization (Day 22); Final Evaluation Visit (Day 77)
Secondary Outcomes (43)
Open-label Titration Period: Average Pain Intensity Score for the Overall Low Back Pain on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-3)
Enrollment (Day -14); Baseline Visit (Day 1); Randomization Visit (Day 22)
Open-label Continuation Period: Average Pain Intensity Score for the Overall Low Back Pain on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-3)
Enrollment (Day -14); Baseline Visit (Day 1); Randomization Visit (Day 22); Final Evaluation Visit (Day 77)
End of Open-label Pick-up Period: Average Pain Intensity Score for the Overall Low Back Pain on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-3)
Final Evaluation Visit (Day 77)
Open-label Titration Period: Radiating Pain
Enrollment Visit (Day -14); Baseline Visit (Day 1); Randomization Visit (Day 22)
Open-label Titration Period: Radiating Mean Pain Intensity Score for the Comparative Period Population
Enrollment Visit (Day -14); Baseline Visit (Day 1); Randomization Visit (Day 22)
- +38 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Tapentadol Prolonged Release
EXPERIMENTALTapentadol Prolonged Release (100 - 500 mg per day) Oral administration twice daily
Tapentadol Prolonged Release with Pregabalin
ACTIVE COMPARATORTapentadol Prolonged Release (100 - 300 mg per day) with Pregabalin (150 - 300 mg per day) Both administered orally twice a day.
Interventions
100 - 500 mg per day orally twice daily for a maximum of 12 weeks
Tapentadol Prolonged Release 100 - 300 mg per day with Pregabalin 150 - 300 mg per day orally twice daily for a maximum of 12 weeks
100 - 400 mg per day Tapentadol Prolonged Release orally administered twice daily
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects must have a diagnosis of chronic low back pain; chronic pain defined as pain lasting for at least 3 months.
- Subject's pain must require a strong analgesic (defined as World Health Organization (WHO) step III) as judged by the investigator.
- The painDETECT diagnostic screening questionnaire score must be:
- "positive" or
- "unclear".or If the subject is being treated with a stable regimen of centrally acting analgesics (opioids) and/or co-analgesics, even a "negative" painDETECT score (but of at least 9) at the enrollment visit will be acceptable.
- If under regular daily pretreatment with a WHO step II/step III opioid analgesic and/or a centrally acting co-analgesic:
- Subjects must be taking a WHO step II or step III analgesic or co- analgesic on a daily basis for at least 2 weeks prior to the enrollment visit.
- Subjects pretreated with a WHO step II opioid analgesic and/or a centrally acting co-analgesic must have reported an average pain intensity score of at least 5 points (NRS-3≥5) during the last 3 days prior to the enrollment visit. or If under regular, daily pretreatment with a WHO step I analgesic monotherapy or if no regular analgesic pretreatment is reported:
- Subjects must have an average pain intensity score of at least 6 points NRS-3≥6) in the last 3 days prior to the enrollment visit.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of concomitant painful conditions other than low back pain that could confound the subject's trial assessments or self-evaluation of the index pain, e.g., syndromes with widespread pain such as fibromyalgia.
- Low back pain caused by cancer and/or metastatic diseases.
- Any painful procedures planned during the trial period (e.g., major surgery) that may, in the opinion of the investigator, affect the effectiveness or safety assessments of the Investigational Medicinal Product (IMP).
- Pending litigation or application for insurance/governmental benefits due to chronic pain or disability and, if granted, benefits might be influenced by a successful participation in the trial.
- Rare hereditary problems of galactose intolerance, Lapp lactase deficiency, or glucose-galactose malabsorption, lactose intolerance.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Grünenthal GmbHlead
Study Sites (59)
Site 506
Klagenfurt, Austria
Site 503
Senftenberg, Austria
Site 501
Vienna, Austria
Site 502
Vienna, Austria
Site 504
Vienna, Austria
Site 505
Vienna, Austria
Site 605
Dour, Belgium
Site 602
Genk, Belgium
Site 603
Gozée, Belgium
Site 604
Ham, Belgium
Site 601
Pellenberg, Belgium
Site 702
Copenhagen, Denmark
Site 704
Frederiksberg, Denmark
Site 701
Glostrup Municipality, Denmark
Site 703
Ringsted, Denmark
DE 118
Berlin, 10787, Germany
Site 107
Berlin, Germany
Site 111
Böhlen, Germany
Site 105
Cologne, Germany
Site 116
Cologne, Germany
Site 115
Cottbus, Germany
Site 103
Hamburg, Germany
Site 110
Hamburg, Germany
Site 101
Kiel, Germany
Site 114
Kiel, Germany
Site 113
Leipzig, Germany
Site 109
Lübeck, Germany
Site 106
Rendsburg, Germany
Site 108
Schönau, Germany
Site 117
Weimar, Germany
Site 112
Westerstede, Germany
Site 104
Wiesbaden, Germany
Site 803
Amsterdam, Netherlands
Site 804
Eindhoven, Netherlands
Site 805
Enschede, Netherlands
Site 802
Heerenveen, Netherlands
Site 801
Sliedrecht, Netherlands
Site 309
Bydgoszcz, Poland
Site 312
Gdansk, Poland
Site 303
Katowice, Poland
Site 308
Krakow, Poland
Site 310
Krakow, Poland
Site 311
Krakow, Poland
Site 307
Lublin, Poland
Site 306
Ostrów Mazowiecka, Poland
Site 304
Poznan, Poland
Site 301
Warsaw, Poland
Site 302
Warsaw, Poland
Site 305
Wroclaw, Poland
Site 904
A Coruña, Spain
Site 908
Alicante, Spain
Site 901
Badalona, Spain
Site 905
Barcelona, Spain
Site 902
Centelles, Spain
Site 907
Granada, Spain
Site 909
Madrid, Spain
Site 910
Madrid, Spain
Site 903
Oviedo, Spain
Site 911
Valencia, Spain
Related Publications (2)
Baron R, Martin-Mola E, Muller M, Dubois C, Falke D, Steigerwald I. Effectiveness and Safety of Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) Versus a Combination of Tapentadol PR and Pregabalin for the Management of Severe, Chronic Low Back Pain With a Neuropathic Component: A Randomized, Double-blind, Phase 3b Study. Pain Pract. 2015 Jun;15(5):455-70. doi: 10.1111/papr.12200. Epub 2014 Apr 17.
PMID: 24738609RESULTBaron R, Kern U, Muller M, Dubois C, Falke D, Steigerwald I. Effectiveness and Tolerability of a Moderate Dose of Tapentadol Prolonged Release for Managing Severe, Chronic Low Back Pain with a Neuropathic Component: An Open-label Continuation Arm of a Randomized Phase 3b Study. Pain Pract. 2015 Jun;15(5):471-86. doi: 10.1111/papr.12199. Epub 2014 Apr 18.
PMID: 24750558RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Director of Clinical Trials
- Organization
- Grünenthal GmbH
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ralf Baron, Prof. Dr.
Neurological pain research and therapy Clinic for Neurology Campus Kiel, University Clinic Schleswig-Holstein, Schittenhelmstr. 10, 24105 Kiel, Germany
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 12, 2011
First Posted
May 12, 2011
Study Start
March 1, 2011
Primary Completion
January 1, 2012
Study Completion
January 1, 2012
Last Updated
October 28, 2019
Results First Posted
August 12, 2016
Record last verified: 2019-10