Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) Versus Oxycodone/Naloxone Prolonged Release in Severe Chronic Low Back Pain With a Neuropathic Component.
Evaluation of the Effectiveness, Safety, and Tolerability of Tapentadol PR Versus Oxycodone/Naloxone PR in Non-opioid Pre-treated Subjects With Uncontrolled Severe Chronic Low Back Pain With a Neuropathic Pain Component.
2 other identifiers
interventional
367
4 countries
50
Brief Summary
This was a clinical effectiveness trial designed to compare the effectiveness, safety, and tolerability of treatment with tapentadol prolonged release with that of oxycodone/naloxone prolonged release in non-opioid pre-treated subjects with severe chronic low back pain with a neuropathic pain component. Both tapentadol and the opioid oxycodone are effective in chronic severe pain and tapentadol and oxycodone/naloxone have shown advantages in gastrointestinal tolerability versus oxycodone. Therefore, it was of high scientific interest to compare the latter 2 analgesics with respect to gastrointestinal tolerability. Tapentadol may have advantages regarding the neuropathic pain-related symptoms of low back pain due to its 2 mechanisms of action.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Apr 2013
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
50 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2013
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 19, 2013
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 24, 2013
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 1, 2014
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
June 8, 2015
CompletedFebruary 24, 2016
January 1, 2016
9 months
April 19, 2013
April 28, 2015
January 25, 2016
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change in the Average Pain Intensity Score on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-3)
For this pain assessment, the participant indicated the level of average pain experienced over the previous 3 days on an 11-point Numeric Rating Scale (NRS-3) where a score of 0 indicated "no pain" and a score of 10 indicated "pain as bad as you can imagine". The value reported represents the change from the randomization visit (i.e., the last 3 days in the washout period prior to Investigational Medicinal Product initiation and titration) to the end of the continuation period (i.e., up to 9 weeks on the stable dose). The theoretical values range from -10 to 10. A negative sign indicates a decrease in pain from the start of treatment. The higher the absolute values, the greater the change since the start of treatment (Baseline Visit).
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Change in the Patient Assessment of Constipation Symptoms (PAC-SYM) Total Score
The Constipation Assessment (PAC-SYM) is a 12-item self-report questionnaire that assessed the severity of symptoms of constipation. Participants were asked "How severe have each of these symptoms been in the last two weeks?" e.g. "Pain in your stomach". There are 3 subscales: 4 questions on abdominal symptoms, 3 on rectal symptoms and 5 on stool symptoms. Responses were rated on a 5-point Likert scale ranging from 0 (absence of symptom) to 4 (very severe symptoms). If the changes in the overall or subscale scores are positive then there is a worsening in symptoms associated with constipation. The change in the assessment of constipation symptoms (PAC-SYM) total score from the Randomization Visit to the Final Evaluation Visit. The PAC-SYM overall score is the sum of scores of all non-missing items divided by the number of non-missing items (if at least 6 items were non-missing).
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Secondary Outcomes (29)
Recalled Average Pain Intensity
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Change in Recalled Average Pain Intensity at the End of Treatment
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Average Pain Intensity Over Three Days for Pain Radiating Towards or Into the Leg
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Change of Average Pain Intensity Over Three Days for Pain Radiating Towards or Into the Leg at the End of Treatment
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
Worst Pain Intensity Over the Past 24 Hours
Baseline (Randomization Visit); End of Continuation Period (Week 12)
- +24 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR)
EXPERIMENTALOxycodone/Naloxone Prolonged Release
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
All participants started with 50 mg tapentadol hydrochloride prolonged release (twice daily). The dose of tapentadol hydrochloride prolonged release will be adjusted in increments of 50 mg to a level that provided adequate analgesia. Titration will be after a minimum of 3 days on a dose. Participants are permitted a maximum dose of 250 mg twice a day (500 mg total daily dose). After titration participants will remain on the stable dose for 9 weeks.
All participants start with 10 mg/5 mg oxycodone/naloxone (twice daily). The dose of oxycodone/naloxone may be adjusted in increments of 10mg/ 5 mg oxycodone/naloxone to a level that provide adequate analgesia. Titration will be after a minimum of 3 days on a dose. Participants will be permitted a maximum dose of 50 mg/ 20 mg oxycodone/naloxone twice daily a day (100 mg/40 mg total daily dose). After titration participants will remain on the stable dose for 9 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Informed consent signed.
- Male or female 18 years of age or older.
- Women of childbearing potential must have a negative pregnancy test at the Enrollment Visit.
- Women of childbearing potential must practice medically acceptable methods of birth control during the trial.
- Participant must be appropriately communicative and able to differentiate with regard to location and intensity of the pain, and to complete the questionnaires used in this trial.
- Participants must have a diagnosis of chronic low back pain; chronic pain defined as pain lasting for at least 3 months prior to enrollment.
- Participant's pain must require a strong analgesic (defined as World Health Organization Step III) as judged by the investigator.
- Participants who require a washout of co-analgesics at enrolment must have an average pain score (NRS-3) of 5 points or higher. Participants who do not require a washout of co-analgesics at enrollment must have an average pain intensity score (NRS-3) during the last 3 days of 6 points or higher.
- The painDETECT diagnostic screening questionnaire must be either "positive" (score of 19 to 38 inclusive) or "unclear" (score of 13 to 18 inclusive). If the participant is being treated with a stable regimen of centrally acting co-analgesics, a "negative" painDETECT score (score 9 points or higher).
- Participants must have an average pain intensity score (NRS-3) during the last 3 days of 6 points or higher.
- Participants must score either "positive" (score of 19 to 38 inclusive) or "unclear" (score of 13 to 18 inclusive) on the painDETECT diagnostic screening questionnaire.
You may not qualify if:
- Presence of a clinically significant disease or clinical laboratory values that in the investigator's opinion may affect effectiveness, quality of life, or safety/tolerability assessments.
- Presence of active systemic or local infections that may, in the opinion of the investigator, affect the effectiveness, quality of life, or safety/tolerability assessments.
- Employees of the investigator or trial site, with direct involvement in this trial or other trials under the direction of the investigator or trial site, as well as family members of employees of the investigator.
- Participation in another trial concurrently, or within 4 weeks prior to the Enrollment Visit.
- Known to or suspected of not being able to comply with the protocol and/or appropriate use of the Investigational Medicinal Products.
- Any painful procedures (e.g., major surgery) scheduled during the trial duration (Enrollment Visit until Final Evaluation Visit) that may, in the opinion of the investigator, affect the effectiveness, quality of life, or safety assessments.
- Pending litigation or application for insurance/governmental benefits due to chronic pain or disability and/or if the granted benefits might be influenced by a successful participation in the trial.
- Low back pain caused by cancer and/or metastatic diseases.
- History of alcohol or drug abuse, or suspicion thereof in the investigator's judgment.
- Presence of concomitant autoimmune inflammatory conditions.
- Participants with acute intoxication with alcohol, hypnotics, centrally acting analgesics, or psychotropic active substances.
- Participants with severe renal impairment, i.e., estimated glomerular filtration rate less than 30 mL/min (according to the National Kidney Foundation 2002).
- Known history of clinical laboratory values or current clinical laboratory values reflecting moderately or severely impaired hepatic function.
- History of seizure disorder or epilepsy.
- Any of the following within 1 year: mild/moderate traumatic brain injury, stroke, transient ischemic attack, or brain neoplasm (including brain metastases if present at the Enrollment Visit). Severe traumatic brain injury within 15 years (consisting of 1 or more of the following: brain contusion, intracranial hematoma, either unconsciousness or post traumatic amnesia lasting more than 24 hours) or residual sequelae suggesting transient changes in consciousness.
- +9 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Grünenthal GmbHlead
Study Sites (50)
AT001
Senftenberg, 3541, Austria
AT002
Vienna, 1100, Austria
DE005
Bad Saarow, 15526, Germany
DE007
Berlin, 10435, Germany
DE021
Berlin, 10787, Germany
DE009
Berlin, 12627, Germany
DE030
Berlin, 13125, Germany
DE020
Bochum, 44787, Germany
DE023
Böhlen, 04564, Germany
DE029
Cologne, 50924, Germany
DE008
Cologne, 51069, Germany
DE028
Cottbus, 03050, Germany
DE012
Dresden, 01067, Germany
DE032
Essen, 45355, Germany
DE017
Frankfurt, 60313, Germany
DE003
Frankfurt, 60596, Germany
DE011
Görlitz, 02826, Germany
DE031
Hamburg, 20253, Germany
DE013
Hanover, 30159, Germany
DE001
Kiel, 24105, Germany
DE027
Kiel, 24106, Germany
DE014
Kiel, 24119, Germany
DE004
Leipzig, 04103, Germany
DE034
Leipzig, 04107, Germany
DE018
Leipzig, 04109, Germany
DE015
Magdeburg, 39104, Germany
DE006
Mainz, 55116, Germany
DE002
Mittweida, 09648, Germany
DE010
Rudolstadt, 07407, Germany
DE025
Schwerin, 19055, Germany
DE019
Stadtroda, 07646, Germany
DE016
Weinheim, 69469, Germany
DE024
Westerstede, 26655, Germany
DE026
Wiesbaden, 65185, Germany
DE022
Wiesbaden, 65187, Germany
IT003
Catania, 95125, Italy
IT001
Genova, 16132, Italy
IT002
Parma, 43126, Italy
IT004
Pavia, 27100, Italy
IT005
Varese, 21046, Italy
ES006
A Coruña, 15006, Spain
ES007
Barcelona, 08006, Spain
ES001
Barcelona, 08916, Spain
ES003
Centelles, 08540, Spain
ES008
Guadix, 18500, Spain
ES002
Madrid, 28046, Spain
ES010
Madrid, 28050, Spain
ES009
Madrid, 28850, Spain
ES004
Oviedo, 33009, Spain
ES005
Santiago de Compostela, 15705, Spain
Related Publications (1)
Baron R, Likar R, Martin-Mola E, Blanco FJ, Kennes L, Muller M, Falke D, Steigerwald I. Effectiveness of Tapentadol Prolonged Release (PR) Compared with Oxycodone/Naloxone PR for the Management of Severe Chronic Low Back Pain with a Neuropathic Component: A Randomized, Controlled, Open-Label, Phase 3b/4 Study. Pain Pract. 2016 Jun;16(5):580-99. doi: 10.1111/papr.12308. Epub 2015 Jun 12.
PMID: 26095455RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Study Director
- Organization
- Grünenthal GmbH
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Director Clinical Trials
Grünenthal GmbH
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 19, 2013
First Posted
April 24, 2013
Study Start
April 1, 2013
Primary Completion
January 1, 2014
Study Completion
January 1, 2014
Last Updated
February 24, 2016
Results First Posted
June 8, 2015
Record last verified: 2016-01