NCT00986180

Brief Summary

Evaluate how NUCYNTA (tapentadol) immediate release (IR) compares with oxycodone IR in the treatment of acute low back pain.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
667

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_3 pain

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2009

Geographic Reach
1 country

74 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2009

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 25, 2009

Completed
4 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 29, 2009

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2010

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2010

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

February 29, 2012

Completed
Last Updated

December 19, 2012

Status Verified

December 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

1.2 years

First QC Date

September 25, 2009

Results QC Date

November 23, 2011

Last Update Submit

December 17, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

Acute Low Back PainLow Back Pain With Leg Pain Below The KneeRadiculopathy, OxycodoneTapentadolNUCYNTA

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) for Low Back Pain - Summary Statistics at 120 Hours (With Imputation)

    Pain intensity is an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). 0=no pain, 10=Pain as bad as you can imagine. The pain intensity difference (PID) was to be calculated as baseline pain minus current pain at each assessment time point. SPID is a weighted sum of PID over a specified time period, say 120 hours.

    0 hour (prior to first dose) and 120 hours

Secondary Outcomes (32)

  • Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) for Low Back Pain - Summary Statistics at 2 Days (With Imputation)

    Day 0 and Day 2

  • SPID for Low Back Pain - Summary Statistics at 3 Days (With Imputation)

    Day 0 and Day 3

  • SPID for Low Back Pain - Summary Statistics at 10 Days (With Imputation)

    Day 0 and Day 10

  • SPID for Index Leg Pain - Summary Statistics at 2 Days (With Imputation)

    Day 0 and Day 2

  • SPID for Index Leg Pain - Summary Statistics at 3 Days (With Imputation)

    Day 0 and Day 3

  • +27 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

001

EXPERIMENTAL

NUCYNTA 50 75 or 100 mg every 4 to 6 hours for up to 10 days as needed for pain

Drug: NUCYNTA

002

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Oxycodone IR 5 10 or 15 mg every 4 to 6 hours for up to 10 days as needed for pain

Drug: Oxycodone IR

Interventions

50, 75, or 100 mg every 4 to 6 hours for up to 10 days as needed for pain

001

5, 10, or 15 mg every 4 to 6 hours for up to 10 days as needed for pain

002

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • At Visit 1 (study entry) patients must have a medical history and physical and neurological examinations that support a clinical diagnosis of acute low back pain that is felt down to the lower leg below the knee with the onset no longer than 30 days before Visit 1
  • At Visit 1 patients must report qualifying pain intensity scores
  • Patients must be appropriate candidates for treatment with oral opioid pain medication in the investigator's clinical judgment
  • Patients must be able to appropriately verbalize pain characteristics and to complete all protocol required measurements/assessments without assistance
  • Patients must be medically stable on the basis of physical examination, medical history, vital signs, and clinical laboratory tests performed at screening

You may not qualify if:

  • History of back (cervical, thoracic or lumbosacral) pain =50% of the time in the 1 year prior to the first visit
  • History of any low back pain episode, with the exception of the current acute low back pain episode, within 3 months prior to the first visit that was greater than mild in pain intensity, or was associated with disability (e.g., loss of time from work, family, or activities of daily living), or necessitated the use of an opioid (narcotic) analgesic including tramadol
  • Medical history or physical examination results that suggest the acute low back pain or any of the neurological symptoms or signs are caused by a serious medical condition (e.g., fever, chills, unexplained weight loss, bowel or urinary bladder dysfunction or incontinence, bilateral leg weakness, progressive weakness, paralysis)
  • There is a high probability for surgical intervention for the back pain during the projected time on the study or that there will be an increase in the severity of the leg pain or deficits
  • Had either a surgical procedure involving the spine or intervertebral discs in the lower back region within 1 year prior to Visit 1 or had \>1 surgical procedure(s) involving the spine or intervertebral discs in the lower back region
  • has any painful condition that could interfere with the study assessments or with the patient's ability to differentiate the pain associated with the acute low back pain episode from pain associated with another condition
  • History of severe lumbar spinal stenosis, fibromyalgia, or ankylosing spondylitis
  • history of epilepsy or recurrent seizures
  • Unable or unwilling to discontinue all prohibited medications at the time of randomization and during the time of their participation in the study
  • Known or suspected history of alcohol or drug abuse based on medical history, physical examination, urine drug screening, or the investigator's clinical judgment
  • History of cancer malignancy within 2 years prior to the first visit, with the exception of basal cell skin carcinoma
  • Have filed or plan to file a worker's compensation claim for any issue related to the current acute low back pain episode
  • Currently involved in litigation or plan to seek legal recourse for any issue related to their acute low back pain
  • Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to tapentadol or the comparator (oxycodone) or any excipients used in their manufacture
  • Had previously been enrolled in a tapentadol clinical study
  • +1 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (74)

Unknown Facility

Mobile, Alabama, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Phoenix, Arizona, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fresno, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Garden Grove, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Glendale, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Laguna Hills, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Palm Springs, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Pismo Beach, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Wildomar, California, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Denver, Colorado, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fairfield, Connecticut, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Boynton Beach, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Clearwater, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Edgewater, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Jacksonville, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lake Worth, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Miami, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Newport Richey, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Oldsmar, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Saint Cloud, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tampa, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

West Palm Beach, Florida, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Atlanta, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Savannah, Georgia, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Avon, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Evansville, Indiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Overland Park, Kansas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lexington, Kentucky, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Covington, Louisiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Mandeville, Louisiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Metairie, Louisiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

New Orleans, Louisiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Sunset, Louisiana, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Fall River, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Florissant, Missouri, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Springfield, Missouri, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Washington, Missouri, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Henderson, Nevada, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Pahrump, Nevada, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Atco, New Jersey, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Blackwood, New Jersey, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Cherry Hill, New Jersey, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

North Massapequa, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Williamsville, New York, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Charlotte, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Hickory, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Mooresville, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Akron, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Andover, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Beavercreek, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Centerville, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Cincinnati, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Marion, Ohio, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Tyrone, Pennsylvania, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Nashville, Tennessee, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Austin, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bryan, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Bulverde, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Houston, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Lake Jackson, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Plano, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

San Antonio, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Sugar Land, Texas, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Clinton, Utah, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Orem, Utah, United States

Location

Unknown Facility

Danville, Virginia, United States

Location

Related Publications (1)

  • Biondi D, Xiang J, Benson C, Etropolski M, Moskovitz B, Rauschkolb C. Tapentadol immediate release versus oxycodone immediate release for treatment of acute low back pain. Pain Physician. 2013 May-Jun;16(3):E237-46.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

PainBack PainLow Back PainRadiculopathy

Interventions

Tapentadol

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurologic ManifestationsSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsPeripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PhenolsBenzene DerivativesHydrocarbons, AromaticHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic Chemicals

Limitations and Caveats

There were 19 subjects either did not take medication or did not have verifiable drug exposure. 2 subjects were randomized in two different sites, only one site information were included. 1 subject were randomized in error.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Vice President, Medical Affairs, Internal Medicine
Organization
Janssen Pharmaceuticals

Study Officials

  • Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC Clinical Trial

    Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
GT60
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 3
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 25, 2009

First Posted

September 29, 2009

Study Start

September 1, 2009

Primary Completion

December 1, 2010

Study Completion

December 1, 2010

Last Updated

December 19, 2012

Results First Posted

February 29, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-12

Locations