NUCYNTA (Tapentadol Immediate Release) Versus Oxycodone Immediate Release in the Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Parallel-Group Study of NUCYNTA (Tapentadol) Immediate Release vs. Oxycodone Immediate Release for the Treatment of Acute Low Back Pain
3 other identifiers
interventional
667
1 country
74
Brief Summary
Evaluate how NUCYNTA (tapentadol) immediate release (IR) compares with oxycodone IR in the treatment of acute low back pain.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_3 pain
Started Sep 2009
74 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
September 25, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
September 29, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 1, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 29, 2012
CompletedDecember 19, 2012
December 1, 2012
1.2 years
September 25, 2009
November 23, 2011
December 17, 2012
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) for Low Back Pain - Summary Statistics at 120 Hours (With Imputation)
Pain intensity is an 11-point numerical rating scale (NRS). 0=no pain, 10=Pain as bad as you can imagine. The pain intensity difference (PID) was to be calculated as baseline pain minus current pain at each assessment time point. SPID is a weighted sum of PID over a specified time period, say 120 hours.
0 hour (prior to first dose) and 120 hours
Secondary Outcomes (32)
Sum of Pain Intensity Difference (SPID) for Low Back Pain - Summary Statistics at 2 Days (With Imputation)
Day 0 and Day 2
SPID for Low Back Pain - Summary Statistics at 3 Days (With Imputation)
Day 0 and Day 3
SPID for Low Back Pain - Summary Statistics at 10 Days (With Imputation)
Day 0 and Day 10
SPID for Index Leg Pain - Summary Statistics at 2 Days (With Imputation)
Day 0 and Day 2
SPID for Index Leg Pain - Summary Statistics at 3 Days (With Imputation)
Day 0 and Day 3
- +27 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
001
EXPERIMENTALNUCYNTA 50 75 or 100 mg every 4 to 6 hours for up to 10 days as needed for pain
002
ACTIVE COMPARATOROxycodone IR 5 10 or 15 mg every 4 to 6 hours for up to 10 days as needed for pain
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- At Visit 1 (study entry) patients must have a medical history and physical and neurological examinations that support a clinical diagnosis of acute low back pain that is felt down to the lower leg below the knee with the onset no longer than 30 days before Visit 1
- At Visit 1 patients must report qualifying pain intensity scores
- Patients must be appropriate candidates for treatment with oral opioid pain medication in the investigator's clinical judgment
- Patients must be able to appropriately verbalize pain characteristics and to complete all protocol required measurements/assessments without assistance
- Patients must be medically stable on the basis of physical examination, medical history, vital signs, and clinical laboratory tests performed at screening
You may not qualify if:
- History of back (cervical, thoracic or lumbosacral) pain =50% of the time in the 1 year prior to the first visit
- History of any low back pain episode, with the exception of the current acute low back pain episode, within 3 months prior to the first visit that was greater than mild in pain intensity, or was associated with disability (e.g., loss of time from work, family, or activities of daily living), or necessitated the use of an opioid (narcotic) analgesic including tramadol
- Medical history or physical examination results that suggest the acute low back pain or any of the neurological symptoms or signs are caused by a serious medical condition (e.g., fever, chills, unexplained weight loss, bowel or urinary bladder dysfunction or incontinence, bilateral leg weakness, progressive weakness, paralysis)
- There is a high probability for surgical intervention for the back pain during the projected time on the study or that there will be an increase in the severity of the leg pain or deficits
- Had either a surgical procedure involving the spine or intervertebral discs in the lower back region within 1 year prior to Visit 1 or had \>1 surgical procedure(s) involving the spine or intervertebral discs in the lower back region
- has any painful condition that could interfere with the study assessments or with the patient's ability to differentiate the pain associated with the acute low back pain episode from pain associated with another condition
- History of severe lumbar spinal stenosis, fibromyalgia, or ankylosing spondylitis
- history of epilepsy or recurrent seizures
- Unable or unwilling to discontinue all prohibited medications at the time of randomization and during the time of their participation in the study
- Known or suspected history of alcohol or drug abuse based on medical history, physical examination, urine drug screening, or the investigator's clinical judgment
- History of cancer malignancy within 2 years prior to the first visit, with the exception of basal cell skin carcinoma
- Have filed or plan to file a worker's compensation claim for any issue related to the current acute low back pain episode
- Currently involved in litigation or plan to seek legal recourse for any issue related to their acute low back pain
- Known allergies, hypersensitivity, or intolerance to tapentadol or the comparator (oxycodone) or any excipients used in their manufacture
- Had previously been enrolled in a tapentadol clinical study
- +1 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLClead
- GrĂ¼nenthal GmbHcollaborator
Study Sites (74)
Unknown Facility
Mobile, Alabama, United States
Unknown Facility
Phoenix, Arizona, United States
Unknown Facility
Jonesboro, Arkansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Fresno, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Garden Grove, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Glendale, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Laguna Hills, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Palm Springs, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Pismo Beach, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Wildomar, California, United States
Unknown Facility
Denver, Colorado, United States
Unknown Facility
Fairfield, Connecticut, United States
Unknown Facility
Boynton Beach, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Clearwater, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Edgewater, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Jacksonville, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Lake Worth, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Miami, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Newport Richey, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Oldsmar, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Pembroke Pines, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Saint Cloud, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Tampa, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
West Palm Beach, Florida, United States
Unknown Facility
Atlanta, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Savannah, Georgia, United States
Unknown Facility
Avon, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Evansville, Indiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Overland Park, Kansas, United States
Unknown Facility
Lexington, Kentucky, United States
Unknown Facility
Covington, Louisiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Mandeville, Louisiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Metairie, Louisiana, United States
Unknown Facility
New Orleans, Louisiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Sunset, Louisiana, United States
Unknown Facility
Fall River, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
North Dartmouth, Massachusetts, United States
Unknown Facility
Kalamazoo, Michigan, United States
Unknown Facility
Florissant, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Springfield, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Washington, Missouri, United States
Unknown Facility
Henderson, Nevada, United States
Unknown Facility
Pahrump, Nevada, United States
Unknown Facility
Atco, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Blackwood, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
Cherry Hill, New Jersey, United States
Unknown Facility
North Massapequa, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Williamsville, New York, United States
Unknown Facility
Charlotte, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Hickory, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Mooresville, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Akron, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Andover, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Beavercreek, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Centerville, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Cincinnati, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Marion, Ohio, United States
Unknown Facility
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, United States
Unknown Facility
Altoona, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Tyrone, Pennsylvania, United States
Unknown Facility
Murrells Inlet, South Carolina, United States
Unknown Facility
Nashville, Tennessee, United States
Unknown Facility
Austin, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Bryan, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Bulverde, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Houston, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Lake Jackson, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Plano, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
San Antonio, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Sugar Land, Texas, United States
Unknown Facility
Clinton, Utah, United States
Unknown Facility
Orem, Utah, United States
Unknown Facility
Danville, Virginia, United States
Related Publications (1)
Biondi D, Xiang J, Benson C, Etropolski M, Moskovitz B, Rauschkolb C. Tapentadol immediate release versus oxycodone immediate release for treatment of acute low back pain. Pain Physician. 2013 May-Jun;16(3):E237-46.
PMID: 23703422DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
There were 19 subjects either did not take medication or did not have verifiable drug exposure. 2 subjects were randomized in two different sites, only one site information were included. 1 subject were randomized in error.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Vice President, Medical Affairs, Internal Medicine
- Organization
- Janssen Pharmaceuticals
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC Clinical Trial
Ortho-McNeil Janssen Scientific Affairs, LLC
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- GT60
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
September 25, 2009
First Posted
September 29, 2009
Study Start
September 1, 2009
Primary Completion
December 1, 2010
Study Completion
December 1, 2010
Last Updated
December 19, 2012
Results First Posted
February 29, 2012
Record last verified: 2012-12