Examination of ACT Implementation in a Vivax / Falciparum Co-endemic Area
An Examination of ACT Strategy in South-central Asia on Falciparum Malaria in a Context Where Vivax is the Major Species
1 other identifier
interventional
4,200
1 country
2
Brief Summary
In areas of which are co-endemic for vivax and falciparum malaria, treatments for the two diseases often differ and this may lead to mistreatment. This places an emphasis on diagnosis at the health service provision level. Diagnosis is also important when malaris endemicity is low - most fevers are not caused by disease. These two issues mean that most malaria and fevers are not adequately treated, even though the drugs may be effective; many patients who do not have malaria are treated for the disease, and patients with malaria may get the wrong treatment for their species. The study aims to test the effectiveness of employing rapid diagnostic tests and will study the effect on correct treatment.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started May 2009
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2009
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 8, 2009
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 9, 2009
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
October 1, 2010
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
October 1, 2010
CompletedFebruary 7, 2014
February 1, 2014
1.4 years
July 8, 2009
February 6, 2014
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of patients correctly treated
Composite measure defined as patients with Pf malaria receiving ACT Drugs; Pv malaria receiving CQ; patients with no malaria receiving no antimalarial drugs. NOTE: Previously reported here as "Proportion of patients incorrectly treated" being 1 minus the Proportion correctly treated. No change in how the outcome was measured.
2009-2010
Secondary Outcomes (2)
% of PV patients not receiving CQ % of PF patients not receiving SP/AS
2009-2010
Diagnostic Accuracy of the different malaria tests
2009-2010
Study Arms (3)
Rapid diagnostic tests
EXPERIMENTALmalaria diagnosis by rapid diagnostic test
Clinic Microscopy
NO INTERVENTIONmalaria diagnosed with field light-microscopy
Clinical Diagnosis
NO INTERVENTIONMalaria diagnosed on the basis of clinical symptoms alone (i.e. not laboratory diagnosis)
Interventions
Dual species test for P. vivax and P. falciparum malaria
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Any patient where the clinician\* considers malaria in the diagnosis - either prescribing an antimalarial or would request a malaria test if available or referring for diagnosis of malaria elsewhere.
- Patient, or parent/guardian, gives informed consent to the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a result from another facility
- Patients referred on for diagnosis in the private sector
- Patients the clinician decides to treat presumptively without requesting a test (defined as treating prior to randomisation)
- Where the clinician requests microscopy specifically due to clinical need prior to randomisation will not be randomised in the trial, but will be noted as part of the study and a reference slide and clinical information will be taken following consent.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicinelead
- Health Protection and Research Organisationcollaborator
- HealthNet TPOcollaborator
- Medical Emergency Relief International (Merlin)collaborator
Study Sites (2)
Merlin
Kunduz, Kunduz, Afghanistan
HealthNet TPO
Jalalabad, Nangarhar, Afghanistan
Related Publications (2)
Hansen KS, Grieve E, Mikhail A, Mayan I, Mohammed N, Anwar M, Baktash SH, Drake TL, Whitty CJ, Rowland MW, Leslie TJ. Cost-effectiveness of malaria diagnosis using rapid diagnostic tests compared to microscopy or clinical symptoms alone in Afghanistan. Malar J. 2015 May 28;14:217. doi: 10.1186/s12936-015-0696-1.
PMID: 26016871DERIVEDLeslie T, Mikhail A, Mayan I, Cundill B, Anwar M, Bakhtash SH, Mohammed N, Rahman H, Zekria R, Whitty CJ, Rowland M. Rapid diagnostic tests to improve treatment of malaria and other febrile illnesses: patient randomised effectiveness trial in primary care clinics in Afghanistan. BMJ. 2014 Jun 19;348:g3730. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g3730.
PMID: 24948695DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Toby Leslie, PhD
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principle Investigator, Professor of Entomology and Malaria Control
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 8, 2009
First Posted
July 9, 2009
Study Start
May 1, 2009
Primary Completion
October 1, 2010
Study Completion
October 1, 2010
Last Updated
February 7, 2014
Record last verified: 2014-02