Cluster Randomised Trial of Malaria RDTs Used by CHWs in Afghanistan
Effectiveness of Community Level Deployment of Rapid Diagnostic Tests for Malaria in Afghanistan: Cluster Randomised Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
2,421
1 country
3
Brief Summary
Malaria is a common, but decreasing, cause of fever in endemic areas. The use of rapid diagnostic tests could improve treatment of malaria at the local community level. Deployment of these tests is, however, a considerable cost. The aim of the study is to evaluate their effect on improving treatment of fever when used by Community Health Workers in Afghanistan. In phase I of the study, the hypothesis is that an RDT diagnosis deployed with standard training and support will improve the accuracy of treatment applied to fever by community health workers when compared to a diagnosis that is based on symptoms alone. In Phase II of the study, the hypothesis is that the accuracy of treatment can be improved by additional training and supportive interventions given to community health workers compared to those who have only had standard training.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_4
Started Feb 2012
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 25, 2011
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
July 27, 2011
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 1, 2012
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2012
CompletedJuly 15, 2022
February 1, 2014
6 months
July 25, 2011
July 14, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Proportion of cases correctly treated
Correctly treated defined as: Those with PCR positive blood sample given an appropriate antimalarial; Those with PCR negative blood sample not given any antimalarial
Outcomes measured during consultation - approximately 30-40 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Proportion of falciparum patients treated with artesunate combination therapy
Outcomes measured during consultation - approximately 30-40 minutes
Accuracy of the RDT
Outcomes measured during consultation - approximately 30-40 minutes
Accuracy of treatment given by the CHW in response to the RDT result
Outcomes measured during consultation - approximately 30-40 minutes
Cost effectiveness of the intervention(s)
Outcomes measured during consultation - approximately 30-40 minutes
Study Arms (2)
Current Practice
NO INTERVENTIONStudy Phase I: No RDT or other parasite based diagnosis; Study Phase II: RDT used under the standard programme of training and support
Intervention Arm
ACTIVE COMPARATORStudy Phase I: RDT used under the standard programme of training and support; Study Phase II: RDTs deployed with additional programme components including improved training and supportive interventions
Interventions
Study Phase I: RDT used under the standard programme of training and support; Study Phase II: RDTs deployed with additional programme components including improved training and supportive interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Any patient where the CHW\* or clinician considers malaria in the diagnosis - either prescribing an antimalarial or would request a malaria test if available or referring for diagnosis of malaria elsewhere.
- \* \*any community health worker who consults with patients and prescribes treatment, and is administratively attached to one of the study clinics.
- Patient, or parent/guardian, gives informed consent to the study.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with a diagnostic result from another facility.
- Patients referred on for diagnosis in the private sector.
- Patients who have signs of severe or complicated disease and are referred prior to giving any diagnosis using the interventions.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicinelead
- Health Protection and Research Organisationcollaborator
- HealthNet TPOcollaborator
- Medical Emergency Relief Internationalcollaborator
Study Sites (3)
HealthNet TPO
Jalalabad, Nangarhar, Afghanistan
Health Protection and Research Organisation
Kabul, 0000, Afghanistan
Merlin
Kunduz, Afghanistan
Related Publications (1)
Leslie T, Rowland M, Mikhail A, Cundill B, Willey B, Alokozai A, Mayan I, Hasanzai A, Baktash SH, Mohammed N, Wood M, Rahimi HU, Laurent B, Buhler C, Whitty CJM. Use of malaria rapid diagnostic tests by community health workers in Afghanistan: cluster randomised trial. BMC Med. 2017 Jul 7;15(1):124. doi: 10.1186/s12916-017-0891-8.
PMID: 28683750DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Toby Leslie, PhD
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 25, 2011
First Posted
July 27, 2011
Study Start
February 1, 2012
Primary Completion
August 1, 2012
Study Completion
August 1, 2012
Last Updated
July 15, 2022
Record last verified: 2014-02