NCT00766168

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to establish the substantial equivalence of the HDS HI 1.54™ to the paflufocon C material control lenses to correct myopia and hyperopia with and without astigmatism. The purpose of the study is to profile the outcome endpoints and the patient acceptance of this Class II medical device.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
76

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jan 2008

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

8 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

January 1, 2008

Completed
7 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2008

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2008

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 1, 2008

Completed
2 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 3, 2008

Completed
Last Updated

June 14, 2012

Status Verified

June 1, 2012

Enrollment Period

7 months

First QC Date

October 1, 2008

Last Update Submit

June 12, 2012

Conditions

Keywords

contact lensrigid gas permeablerefractive index

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Best Corrected Visual Acuity vs Control

    Of the 72 Completed Test eyes, seven (7) eyes were reported to show a decrease in visual acuity of greater than 0.20 logMAR of which six (6) eyes were for a targeted monovision near power. Of the 56 Completed Control eyes eight (8) eyes were reported to show a decrease in visual acuity of greater than 0.20 logMAR of which seven (7) eyes were for a targeted monovision near power. The reasons cited for the decrease of the remaining Test eye was a reported baseline measurement error and for the remaining Control eye was lenses being switched eye for eye.

    3 months

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Incidence of problems , symptoms and complaints vs control

    3 months

  • slit lamp observations greater than grade 3

    3 months

Study Arms (2)

Control

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

FluoroPerm 30 RGP lens daily wear

Device: FluoroPerm 30 RGP; paflufocon C

HDS HI 1.54

EXPERIMENTAL

New rigid gas permeable contact lens material material

Other: HDS HI 1.54; pahrifocon A

Interventions

Contact Lens

Also known as: pahrifocon A
HDS HI 1.54

Contact lens daily wear

Also known as: paflufocon C
Control

Eligibility Criteria

Age12 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects may be male or female, of any race, and at least 12 years old at the time of the pre-treatment examination.
  • The prospective eye(s) must have naturally occurring refractive myopia up to -20.00 D or hyperopia or aphakia up to +20.00 D sphere (spectacle plane), with less than 10.00 D of refractive astigmatism (spectacle plane), as determined by manifest refraction (phoropter or trial frame with a 12.5 mm vertex distance). Subjects must have best spectacle corrected visual acuity of at least 0.30 logMAR (20/40) in each eye.
  • All subjects must be treated bilaterally.
  • Subjects must be willing and capable to return for all scheduled follow-up visits for a period of at least 3 months.

You may not qualify if:

  • Female subjects who are pregnant, breast-feeding or intend to become pregnant over the course of the study.
  • Subjects with a history of any of the following medical conditions: collagen vascular disease, autoimmune disease, immunodeficiency diseases, ocular herpes zoster or simplex, endocrine disorders (including, but not limited to active thyroid disorders and diabetes), lupus, and rheumatoid arthritis.
  • NOTE: The presence of diabetes (either type 1 or 2), regardless of disease duration, severity or control, will specifically exclude subjects from eligibility.
  • Subjects with a history of intraocular or corneal surgery (excluding cataract extraction and refractive surgery), active ophthalmic disease or abnormality (including, but not limited to, blepharitis, recurrent corneal erosion, dry eye syndrome, neovascularization \> 1mm from limbus), clinically significant lens opacity, clinical evidence of trauma (including scarring), or with evidence of glaucoma or propensity for narrow angle glaucoma as determined by gonioscopic examination in either eye.
  • NOTE: This includes any patient with open angle glaucoma, regardless of medication regimen or control. Additionally, any patient with an IOP greater than 21 mm Hg at baseline is specifically excluded from eligibility.
  • Subjects with evidence of keratoconus, corneal irregularity, or abnormal videokeratography in either eye.
  • Subjects who are participating in any other clinical trial (FDA or other).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (8)

Mission Optometry

Lake Elsinore, California, 92530, United States

Location

Eyecare Consultants

Englewood, Colorado, 80112, United States

Location

Vision Care Associates

East Lansing, Michigan, 48823, United States

Location

Koetting Associates

St Louis, Missouri, 63144, United States

Location

Visionary Eye Associates

Rochester, New York, 14618, United States

Location

Western Reserve Vision Care

Beachwood, Ohio, 44122, United States

Location

Choate Eye Associates

Goodlettsville, Tennessee, 37072, United States

Location

Twin Lakes Vision Clinic

Federal Way, Washington, 98023, United States

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

MyopiaHyperopia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Refractive ErrorsEye Diseases

Study Officials

  • Jerome A. Legerton, OD, MS

    Consultant to Paragon Vision Sciences

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 1, 2008

First Posted

October 3, 2008

Study Start

January 1, 2008

Primary Completion

August 1, 2008

Study Completion

August 1, 2008

Last Updated

June 14, 2012

Record last verified: 2012-06

Locations