NCT03278223

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study is to evaluate the clinical performance of the contact lens care product Oté Sensation in a representative population of soft contact lens wearers. For comparison, a widely used FDA approved soft lens multipurpose solution will be used as a control. This control product has been tested in previous clinical trials.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
194

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Aug 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
2 countries

11 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 14, 2017

Completed
25 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

September 8, 2017

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

September 11, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 17, 2017

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 20, 2017

Completed
3.3 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

March 26, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

March 26, 2021

Status Verified

March 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

3 months

First QC Date

September 8, 2017

Results QC Date

August 30, 2019

Last Update Submit

March 2, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

Multipurpose Contact Lens Care System

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (7)

  • Comfort

    Subjective comfort(during the day). Subject grading comfort of lenses 0-10 (Higher scores indicates the subjects greater comfort with the lenses.)

    Up to 4 weeks

  • Visual Acuity (VA)

    Monocular and binocular high contrast Visual Acuity (VA) was measured at each visit and evaluated using a LogMAR VA Chart where the size of the letters become increasingly smaller from the top of the chart to the bottom of the chart. On this scale, the minimum VA (Worst achievable) is +1.00 LogMAR and the maximum value (Best achievable) is -0.30 LogMAR. Each line of the chart (a total of five letters per line) is equivalent to -0.10 LogMAR and each letter read is equivalent to -0.02. The lower the score/measurement , indicate a better VA obtained. Participants were positioned at a distance of three meters from the eye chart and asked to start reading letters from the top line and to continuing reading letters until they are unable to correctly identify three letters on any given line. The Visual Acuity was recorded to the nearest letter.

    Visual Acuity was assessed for all participants after 2 weeks from day of dispensing lens solution and then again at the final evaluation at the 1 month visit.

  • Lens Surface Wetting

    Lens surface wettability rated on the appearance of the lens surface and the drying time viewed with a slit lamp under low magnification. 0-4 scale (4 = Excellent)

    Up to 4 weeks

  • Film Deposits

    Any film deposits (protein/lipid) attached to the front surface of the lens. Scan the entire lens surface (10- 20X) for the presence of deposits. 0-4 (4= Heavy film)

    Up to 4 weeks

  • Corneal Staining

    Assessed using a slit lamp by sector with fluorescein, blue light, yellow filter and full beam using a medium magnification. Cornea staining will be assessed by sector (Central, Nasal, Temporal, Inferior, Superior) using a 0-4 scale where 0-4 is the total corneal staining score and higher staining score indicates a worse outcome.

    Up to 4 weeks

  • Limbal Hyperemia

    Assessed using slit lamp with white light, low-medium magnification. 0-4 ( 4= Severe)

    Up to 4 weeks

  • Bulbar Hyperemia

    Assessed using slit lamp with white light, low-medium magnification 0-4 ( 4= Severe)

    Up to 4 weeks

Study Arms (2)

Test solution

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A Multi-purpose soft contact lens care solution containing polyaminopropyl biguanide, polyquaternium-2.

Device: Test solution

Control solution

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A Multi-purpose soft contact lens care solution containing polyaminopropyl biguanide, polyquaternium-1.

Device: Control solution

Interventions

A Multi-purpose soft contact lens care solution containing polyaminopropyl biguanide, polyquaternium-2.

Test solution

A Multi-purpose soft contact lens care solution containing polyaminopropyl biguanide, polyquaternium-1.

Control solution

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Be a currently adapted soft contact lens wearer (\>1 month of lens wear).
  • Be at least 18 years of age.
  • Refractive astigmatism \<0.75 D in both eyes.
  • Have clear corneas and be free of any anterior segment disorders.
  • Be correctable through spherocylindrical refraction to 6/12 (20/40) (0.30 LogMAR) or better in each eye.
  • Contact lens sphere requirement between +4.00 Dioptre and -8.00 D (inclusive).
  • Require visual correction in both eyes (monovision allowed, no monofit).
  • Have normal eyes with no evidence of abnormality or disease. For the purposes of this study a normal eye is defined as one having:
  • No amblyopia
  • No strabismus
  • No evidence of lid abnormality or infection
  • No conjunctival abnormality or infection that would contraindicate contact lens wear
  • No clinically significant slit lamp findings (i.e. corneal staining, stromal edema, staining, scarring, vascularization, infiltrates or abnormal opacities)
  • No other active ocular disease.

You may not qualify if:

  • Require toric or multifocal contact lenses.
  • Previously shown a sensitivity to any of the study solution components.
  • Any systemic or ocular disease or allergies affecting ocular health.
  • Using systemic or topical medications that will in the investigator's opinion affect ocular physiology or lens performance.
  • Clinically significant (\>Grade 3) corneal staining, corneal stromal edema, corneal vascularization, tarsal abnormalities, bulbar hyperemia, limbal hyperemia, or any other abnormality of the cornea that would contraindicate contact lens wear.
  • Any corneal infiltrates or any corneal scarring or neovascularization within the central 5mm of the cornea.
  • Keratoconus or other corneal irregularity.
  • Aphakia or amblyopia.
  • Have undergone corneal refractive surgery or any anterior segment surgery.
  • Abnormal lacrimal secretions.
  • Has diabetes.
  • Known/reported infectious disease (e.g., hepatitis, tuberculosis) or an immunosuppressive disease (e.g., HIV).
  • History of chronic eye disease (e.g. glaucoma).
  • Pregnant or lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment.
  • Participation in any concurrent clinical trial or in last 30 days.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (11)

Golden Vision

Sarasota, Florida, 34232, United States

Location

Kannarr Eye Care

Pittsburg, Kansas, 66762, United States

Location

Sacco Eye Group

Vestal, New York, 13850, United States

Location

Optometry Group PLLC

Memphis, Tennessee, 38111, United States

Location

Frazier Vision, Inc.

Tyler, Texas, 75703, United States

Location

Eyesite

Reading, Berkshire, RG1 1EX, United Kingdom

Location

Leightons and Tempany

Poole, Bournemouth, BH15 1AU, United Kingdom

Location

Brock and Houlford

Chew Magna, Bristol, BS40 8PR, United Kingdom

Location

Harrold Opticians

Uxbridge, Middlesex, UB8 1JX, United Kingdom

Location

First Contact

Eastcote, Pinner, HA5 1RJ, United Kingdom

Location

Visioncare Research Ltd

Farnham, Surrey, GU9 7EN, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

MyopiaHyperopia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Refractive ErrorsEye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
Mr Thomas Boyes, Clinical Project Manager
Organization
Visioncare Research Ltd.

Study Officials

  • Frances L Nicklin, Bsc, MCOptom

    Visioncare Research Ltd.

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restriction Type
OTHER
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

September 8, 2017

First Posted

September 11, 2017

Study Start

August 14, 2017

Primary Completion

November 17, 2017

Study Completion

December 20, 2017

Last Updated

March 26, 2021

Results First Posted

March 26, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-03

Locations