NCT01392950

Brief Summary

A clinical study report follows; this clinical study evaluated the safety and efficacy of SAUFLON CLARITI Soft Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens with UV Blocker by comparison with Air Optix Aqua silicone hydrogel contact lenses (Ciba Vision Inc.). Subjects used OptiFree Replenish solution (Alcon Laboratories Inc.) for daily lens maintenance, care and storage.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
90

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Sep 2010

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

September 1, 2010

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

October 1, 2010

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

March 1, 2011

Completed
4 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

July 6, 2011

Completed
7 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

July 13, 2011

Completed
Last Updated

July 29, 2011

Status Verified

July 1, 2011

Enrollment Period

1 month

First QC Date

July 6, 2011

Last Update Submit

July 27, 2011

Conditions

Keywords

silicone hydrogel contact lenses for daily wear

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Overall subjective acceptance

    The results of this study showed the safety, acceptability and substantial equivalence of the Sauflon CLARITI (somofilcon A) Soft Silicone Hydrogel Contact Lens with UV Blocker to the predicate device for its intended use.

    3 months

Study Arms (2)

Air Optix Aqua

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Compare safety and efficacy using OptiFree Replenish solution

Device: Air Optix Aqua

Clariti

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Compare safety and efficacy of the lens using OptiFree Replenish solution

Device: Clariti

Interventions

Lenses will be worn on a daily wear basis (ie. removed at night and stored in solution) and worn in the normal way. Lenses will be replaced each month. Lenses should be worn for a minimum of six hours a day, four days a week. The lenses are also to be worn for a minimum of two hours before attending all follow-up visits.

Air Optix Aqua
ClaritiDEVICE

Lenses will be worn on a daily wear basis (ie. removed at night and stored in solution) and worn in the normal way. Lenses will be replaced each month. Lenses should be worn for a minimum of six hours a day, four days a week. The lenses are also to be worn for a minimum of two hours before attending all follow-up visits.

Clariti

Eligibility Criteria

Age19 Years - 63 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Subjects will only be eligible for the study if:
  • They are 18 years of age and above.
  • They understand their rights as a research subject and are willing and able to sign a Statement of Informed Consent.
  • They are willing and able to follow the protocol.
  • They agree not to participate in other clinical research for the duration of this study.
  • They can attain at least 6/9 in each eye with the study contact lenses.
  • They have successfully worn contact lenses within six months of starting the study.
  • They can be fitted with spherical soft contact lenses within the power range available.

You may not qualify if:

  • Subjects will not be eligible if:
  • They have an ocular disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
  • They have a systemic disorder which would normally contra-indicate contact lens wear.
  • They are using any topical medication such as eye drops or ointment.
  • They have glaucoma (high pressure in the eye), have had cataract surgery or a history of recurring abrasions.
  • They have had corneal refractive surgery.
  • They have any corneal distortion resulting from previous hard or rigid lens wear or have keratoconus.
  • They are pregnant or lactating.
  • They have grade 2 or greater of any of the following ocular surface signs: corneal oedema, corneal vascularisation, corneal staining, tarsal conjunctival changes or any other abnormality which would normally contraindicate contact lens wear.
  • They have taken part in any other clinical trial or research, within two weeks prior to starting this study.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Eurolens Research Faculty of Life Sciences The University of Manchester

Manchester, Manchester, M60 1QD, United Kingdom

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

HyperopiaMyopia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Refractive ErrorsEye Diseases

Study Officials

  • Philip Morgan, PhD

    MCOptom FAAO FBCLA

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

July 6, 2011

First Posted

July 13, 2011

Study Start

September 1, 2010

Primary Completion

October 1, 2010

Study Completion

March 1, 2011

Last Updated

July 29, 2011

Record last verified: 2011-07

Locations