NCT06098339

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to compare the clinical performance of two different reusable lenses in habitual spherical soft lens wearers.

Trial Health

90
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
53

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Nov 2023

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
2 countries

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 19, 2023

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

October 24, 2023

Completed
20 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 13, 2023

Completed
5 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 4, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 4, 2024

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 9, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

August 28, 2024

Status Verified

May 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

5 months

First QC Date

October 19, 2023

Results QC Date

June 13, 2024

Last Update Submit

August 6, 2024

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Lens Handling on Removal

    Participants measured subjective lens handling at removal on a 0-100 integer scale, where 0=worst and 100=best. Results for each lens were collected in the at-home diary on Day 27.

    Day 27

Study Arms (2)

Lens A, then Lens B

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants wore Lens A for one month and then Lens B for one month.

Device: Lens A (fanfilcon A)Device: Lens B (lotrafilcon B)

Lens B, then Lens A

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants wore Lens B one month and then Lens A for one month.

Device: Lens A (fanfilcon A)Device: Lens B (lotrafilcon B)

Interventions

Daily wear for one month

Lens A, then Lens BLens B, then Lens A

Daily wear for one month

Lens A, then Lens BLens B, then Lens A

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 39 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • Were at least 18 years of age and no older than 39 years, and had full legal capacity to volunteer;
  • Had read and signed an information consent letter;
  • Were willing and able to follow instructions and maintain the appointment schedule;
  • Self-reported having had a full eye examination in the previous two years;
  • Had healthy eyes with no health condition or medication that contra-indicate contact lens wear, in the opinion of the investigator;
  • Anticipated being able to wear the study lenses for at least 8 hours a day, 6 days a week;
  • Habitually wore spherical soft contact lenses, for the past 3 months minimum:
  • It was preferred that all participants were habitual frequent replacement lens wearers. However, if this was not possible then no more than 5 participants could be habitual daily disposable lens wearers at each site, the rest had to be habitual frequent replacement lens wearers;
  • \- For the frequent replacement wearers: No more than 3 could be habitual wearers of the Avaira Vitality™/ Serenity™ brand (or their equivalent private label brand name) and no more than 3 could be habitual wearers of AIR OPTIX® plus HydraGlyde® can be enrolled at each site;
  • Had refractive astigmatism no higher than -0.75DC in each eye;
  • Could be fit and achieve binocular distance vision of at least 20/30 Snellen (Available lens parameters are sphere +6.00 to -6.00D, 0.25D steps).

You may not qualify if:

  • Were participating in any concurrent clinical or research study;
  • Had any known active ocular disease and/or infection that contraindicated contact lens wear;
  • Had a systemic or ocular condition that in the opinion of the investigator may have affected a study outcome variable;
  • Were using any systemic or topical medications that in the opinion of the investigator may have affect contact lens wear or a study outcome variable;
  • Had known sensitivity to the diagnostic sodium fluorescein used in the study;
  • Self-reported as pregnant, lactating or planning a pregnancy at the time of enrolment;
  • Had undergone refractive error surgery or intraocular surgery.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

Coan Eye Care

Ocoee, Florida, 34761, United States

Location

Nittany Eye Associates

State College, Pennsylvania, 16801, United States

Location

Insight Eye Care

Waterloo, Ontario, N2L 3S1, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

MyopiaHyperopia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Refractive ErrorsEye Diseases

Results Point of Contact

Title
José A. Vega, O.D., MSc., PhD, FAAO
Organization
CooperVision Inc.

Study Officials

  • Carolyn MacNeil

    Insight Eye Care

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Abigail Gillogly-Harsch

    Nittany Eye Associates

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Roxanne Achong-Coan

    Coan Eye Care

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
Yes

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 19, 2023

First Posted

October 24, 2023

Study Start

November 13, 2023

Primary Completion

April 4, 2024

Study Completion

April 4, 2024

Last Updated

August 28, 2024

Results First Posted

July 9, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations