Trial of 2 Cycles of Induction Chemo With Abraxane, Cetuximab, Cisplatin, & 5-FU for Advanced Head and Neck Cancer
Trial to Determine the CR Rate at the Primary Tumor Site After 2 Cycles of Induction Chemo With Abraxane, Cetuximab, Cisplatin, & 5-FU for Advanced Head & Neck Carcinoma Treated With Definitive Concurrent Cisplatin & Radiation Therapy
1 other identifier
interventional
30
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This phase two trial will determine the tumor response rate at the primary site and at involved regional nodes to two cycles of an IC regimen of weekly Abraxane and cetuximab given in combination with cisplatin and 5-FU in patients with local regionally advanced HNSCC.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Dec 2008
Longer than P75 for phase_2
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
August 13, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 18, 2008
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 19, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 31, 2010
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 7, 2014
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 6, 2020
CompletedSeptember 9, 2020
August 1, 2020
1.7 years
August 13, 2008
November 18, 2013
August 21, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Clinical Complete Response Rate at the Primary Tumor
Clinical exam included laryngoscopy in office or operating room. Complete response rate includes complete response (CR) which is defined as 100% decrease in tumor size and it also includes near complete response (near CR) defined as 95-99% decrease in tumor size.
post-2 cycles of induction (approximately 42 days from start of treatment)
Secondary Outcomes (19)
Clinical Partial Response Rate at the Primary Tumor
post-2 cycles of induction therapy (approximately 42 days from start of treatment)
Clinical Complete and Partial Response Rates to the Involved Regional Nodes
post-2 cycles of induction therapy (approximately 42 days from start of treatment)
Clinical Overall Complete and Partial Response Rates
post-2 cycles of induction therapy (approximately 42 days)
Complete and Partial Response Rates of Primary Tumor by FDG Uptake on PET Scan
post-2 cycles of induction therapy (approximately 42 days from start of treatment)
Complete and Partial Response Rates of Involved Lymph Nodes by FDG Uptake on PET Scan
post-2 cycles of induction therapy (approximately 42 days from start of treatment)
- +14 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (1)
Overall Complete and Partial Response Rates by FDG Uptake on PET Scan
post-2 cycles of induction therapy (approximately 42 days from start of treatment)
Study Arms (2)
1
EXPERIMENTALInduction chemotherapy followed by Radiation therapy plus Cisplatin Induction chemotherapy: Abraxane 100 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 1, 8, and 15 of cycles 1, 2, and 3. Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 1, cycle 1. Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 8 and 15 cycle 1, 2 and 3. Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 1, cycles 1, 2, and 3. 5-FU 750 mg/m2 CIVI, Day 1, 2 and 3, cycles 1, 2, and 3. Post-Induction: Radiation - Monday-Friday weeks 1-7 with concurrent Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 IVPB on radiation day 1, 22, and 42.
2
EXPERIMENTALInduction chemotherapy followed by Radiation therapy plus Cetuximab Induction chemotherapy: Abraxane 100 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 1, 8, and 15 of cycles 1, 2, and 3. Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 1, cycle 1. Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 8 and 15 cycle 1, 2 and 3. Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 1, cycles 1, 2, and 3. 5-FU 750 mg/m2 CIVI, Day 1, 2 and 3, cycles 1, 2, and 3. Post-Induction: Radiation - Monday-Friday weeks 1-7 with concurrent Cetuximab (for patients who cannot receive cisplatin) will begin (+/- 3 days) before starting radiation therapy at 400 mg/m2 IVPB. Subsequent doses of cetuximab will be given weekly at 250 mg/m2 IVPB
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Selected Stages 3 and 4a/b HNSCC: All patients must have T2-T4 primary tumors. Patients with T1 tumors will be excluded. Although most of these patients will have regional nodal disease, patients with no nodal disease will also be eligible.
- Oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, and oral cavity sub-sites only. Patients with nasopharyngeal, sinus and other sub-sites of the head and neck, or unknown primary SCC of the head and neck will NOT be eligible.
- Age ≥18 years
- Signed informed consent.
- ECOG Performance Status (PS) of 0-2 (Appendix 1).
- Adequate vital organ function (serum creatinine \< 1.8 mg/dl, total bilirubin \</= 1.5 mg/dl, ALT and AST \</= 2.5 x ULN, alkaline phosphatase \</= 2.5 x ULN) and hematopoietic function (ANC \>/= 1500/ul, Platelets \> 100,000/ul, HGB \> 9.0 g/dl).
- Patients with reproductive potential must use an effective method of contraception to avoid pregnancy for the duration of the trial and for three months after completing treatment.
- If female of childbearing potential, the patient must have a negative pregnancy test.
You may not qualify if:
- Peripheral neuropathy \> Grade 1.
- Prior chemotherapy, EGFR targeted therapy or radiation therapy for HNSCC.
- History of prior invasive malignancy diagnosed within the last three years other than local stage non-melanoma skin cancer.
- Be taking cimetidine or allopurinol. Patients must discontinue taking the medication for one week before receiving treatment with Abraxane.
- Be taking cimetidine or allopurinol. Patients must discontinue taking the medication for one week before receiving treatment with Abraxane.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Washington University School of Medicinelead
- Celgene Corporationcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Washington University School of Medicine
St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States
Related Publications (18)
Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Group; Wolf GT, Fisher SG, Hong WK, Hillman R, Spaulding M, Laramore GE, Endicott JW, McClatchey K, Henderson WG. Induction chemotherapy plus radiation compared with surgery plus radiation in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1991 Jun 13;324(24):1685-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199106133242402.
PMID: 2034244BACKGROUNDJCO 12:1592, 1194
BACKGROUNDHitt R, Lopez-Pousa A, Martinez-Trufero J, Escrig V, Carles J, Rizo A, Isla D, Vega ME, Marti JL, Lobo F, Pastor P, Valenti V, Belon J, Sanchez MA, Chaib C, Pallares C, Anton A, Cervantes A, Paz-Ares L, Cortes-Funes H. Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus fluorouracil to paclitaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 1;23(34):8636-45. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.1990. Epub 2005 Nov 7.
PMID: 16275937BACKGROUNDBurtness B, Goldwasser MA, Flood W, Mattar B, Forastiere AA; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Phase III randomized trial of cisplatin plus placebo compared with cisplatin plus cetuximab in metastatic/recurrent head and neck cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 1;23(34):8646-54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.4646.
PMID: 16314626BACKGROUNDKuperman, et al ASCO 2007
BACKGROUNDKies, et al ASCO 2006
BACKGROUNDten Tije AJ, Verweij J, Loos WJ, Sparreboom A. Pharmacological effects of formulation vehicles : implications for cancer chemotherapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42(7):665-85. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200342070-00005.
PMID: 12844327BACKGROUNDSparreboom A, van Zuylen L, Brouwer E, Loos WJ, de Bruijn P, Gelderblom H, Pillay M, Nooter K, Stoter G, Verweij J. Cremophor EL-mediated alteration of paclitaxel distribution in human blood: clinical pharmacokinetic implications. Cancer Res. 1999 Apr 1;59(7):1454-7.
PMID: 10197613BACKGROUNDWiner EP, Berry DA, Woolf S, Duggan D, Kornblith A, Harris LN, Michaelson RA, Kirshner JA, Fleming GF, Perry MC, Graham ML, Sharp SA, Keresztes R, Henderson IC, Hudis C, Muss H, Norton L. Failure of higher-dose paclitaxel to improve outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer: cancer and leukemia group B trial 9342. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jun 1;22(11):2061-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.048.
PMID: 15169793BACKGROUNDvan Tellingen O, Huizing MT, Panday VR, Schellens JH, Nooijen WJ, Beijnen JH. Cremophor EL causes (pseudo-) non-linear pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in patients. Br J Cancer. 1999 Sep;81(2):330-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690696.
PMID: 10496361BACKGROUNDDesai N, et al SABCS Dec, 2003
BACKGROUNDGradishar WJ, Tjulandin S, Davidson N, Shaw H, Desai N, Bhar P, Hawkins M, O'Shaughnessy J. Phase III trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel compared with polyethylated castor oil-based paclitaxel in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 1;23(31):7794-803. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.937. Epub 2005 Sep 19.
PMID: 16172456BACKGROUNDGradishar,et al SABCS 2006
BACKGROUNDSABCS 2006
BACKGROUNDKato Y, Nagashima Y, Baba Y, Kawano T, Furukawa M, Kubota A, Yanoma S, Imagawa-Ishiguro Y, Satake K, Taguchi T, Hata R, Mochimatsu I, Aoki I, Kameda Y, Inayama Y, Tsukuda M. Expression of SPARC in tongue carcinoma of stage II is associated with poor prognosis: an immunohistochemical study of 86 cases. Int J Mol Med. 2005 Aug;16(2):263-8.
PMID: 16012759BACKGROUNDMendez E, et al Cancer 95:1482-1494, 2005
BACKGROUNDDesai N, et al SABCS Dec, 2004
BACKGROUNDAdkins D, Ley J, Oppelt P, Wildes TM, Gay HA, Daly M, Rich J, Paniello RC, Jackson R, Pipkorn P, Nussenbaum B, Trinkaus K, Thorstad W. nab-Paclitaxel-based induction chemotherapy with or without cetuximab for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2017 Sep;72:26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 8.
PMID: 28797458DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Douglas R. Adkins
- Organization
- Washington University School of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Douglas Adkins, M.D.
Washington Univerisity
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
August 13, 2008
First Posted
August 18, 2008
Study Start
December 19, 2008
Primary Completion
August 31, 2010
Study Completion
July 6, 2020
Last Updated
September 9, 2020
Results First Posted
January 7, 2014
Record last verified: 2020-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share