NCT00736944

Brief Summary

This phase two trial will determine the tumor response rate at the primary site and at involved regional nodes to two cycles of an IC regimen of weekly Abraxane and cetuximab given in combination with cisplatin and 5-FU in patients with local regionally advanced HNSCC.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
30

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for phase_2

Timeline
Completed

Started Dec 2008

Longer than P75 for phase_2

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

August 13, 2008

Completed
5 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

August 18, 2008

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

December 19, 2008

Completed
1.7 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 31, 2010

Completed
3.4 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

January 7, 2014

Completed
6.5 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

July 6, 2020

Completed
Last Updated

September 9, 2020

Status Verified

August 1, 2020

Enrollment Period

1.7 years

First QC Date

August 13, 2008

Results QC Date

November 18, 2013

Last Update Submit

August 21, 2020

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Clinical Complete Response Rate at the Primary Tumor

    Clinical exam included laryngoscopy in office or operating room. Complete response rate includes complete response (CR) which is defined as 100% decrease in tumor size and it also includes near complete response (near CR) defined as 95-99% decrease in tumor size.

    post-2 cycles of induction (approximately 42 days from start of treatment)

Secondary Outcomes (19)

  • Clinical Partial Response Rate at the Primary Tumor

    post-2 cycles of induction therapy (approximately 42 days from start of treatment)

  • Clinical Complete and Partial Response Rates to the Involved Regional Nodes

    post-2 cycles of induction therapy (approximately 42 days from start of treatment)

  • Clinical Overall Complete and Partial Response Rates

    post-2 cycles of induction therapy (approximately 42 days)

  • Complete and Partial Response Rates of Primary Tumor by FDG Uptake on PET Scan

    post-2 cycles of induction therapy (approximately 42 days from start of treatment)

  • Complete and Partial Response Rates of Involved Lymph Nodes by FDG Uptake on PET Scan

    post-2 cycles of induction therapy (approximately 42 days from start of treatment)

  • +14 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Overall Complete and Partial Response Rates by FDG Uptake on PET Scan

    post-2 cycles of induction therapy (approximately 42 days from start of treatment)

Study Arms (2)

1

EXPERIMENTAL

Induction chemotherapy followed by Radiation therapy plus Cisplatin Induction chemotherapy: Abraxane 100 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 1, 8, and 15 of cycles 1, 2, and 3. Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 1, cycle 1. Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 8 and 15 cycle 1, 2 and 3. Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 1, cycles 1, 2, and 3. 5-FU 750 mg/m2 CIVI, Day 1, 2 and 3, cycles 1, 2, and 3. Post-Induction: Radiation - Monday-Friday weeks 1-7 with concurrent Cisplatin 100 mg/m2 IVPB on radiation day 1, 22, and 42.

Drug: AbraxaneDrug: CetuximabDrug: CisplatinDrug: 5-FURadiation: Radiation (Post induction)

2

EXPERIMENTAL

Induction chemotherapy followed by Radiation therapy plus Cetuximab Induction chemotherapy: Abraxane 100 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 1, 8, and 15 of cycles 1, 2, and 3. Cetuximab 400 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 1, cycle 1. Cetuximab 250 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 8 and 15 cycle 1, 2 and 3. Cisplatin 75 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 1, cycles 1, 2, and 3. 5-FU 750 mg/m2 CIVI, Day 1, 2 and 3, cycles 1, 2, and 3. Post-Induction: Radiation - Monday-Friday weeks 1-7 with concurrent Cetuximab (for patients who cannot receive cisplatin) will begin (+/- 3 days) before starting radiation therapy at 400 mg/m2 IVPB. Subsequent doses of cetuximab will be given weekly at 250 mg/m2 IVPB

Drug: AbraxaneDrug: CetuximabDrug: CisplatinDrug: 5-FURadiation: Radiation (Post induction)

Interventions

100 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 1, 8 and 15 of cycles 1, 2, and 3

12

400 mg/m2 IVPB, Day 1, cycle 1

12

75 mg/m2 IVPB Day 1, cycles 1, 2 and 3

12
5-FUDRUG

750 mg/m2 CIVI Day 1, 2 and 3, cycles 1, 2 and 3

12

Monday-Friday, weeks 1-7

12

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Selected Stages 3 and 4a/b HNSCC: All patients must have T2-T4 primary tumors. Patients with T1 tumors will be excluded. Although most of these patients will have regional nodal disease, patients with no nodal disease will also be eligible.
  • Oropharynx, hypopharynx, larynx, and oral cavity sub-sites only. Patients with nasopharyngeal, sinus and other sub-sites of the head and neck, or unknown primary SCC of the head and neck will NOT be eligible.
  • Age ≥18 years
  • Signed informed consent.
  • ECOG Performance Status (PS) of 0-2 (Appendix 1).
  • Adequate vital organ function (serum creatinine \< 1.8 mg/dl, total bilirubin \</= 1.5 mg/dl, ALT and AST \</= 2.5 x ULN, alkaline phosphatase \</= 2.5 x ULN) and hematopoietic function (ANC \>/= 1500/ul, Platelets \> 100,000/ul, HGB \> 9.0 g/dl).
  • Patients with reproductive potential must use an effective method of contraception to avoid pregnancy for the duration of the trial and for three months after completing treatment.
  • If female of childbearing potential, the patient must have a negative pregnancy test.

You may not qualify if:

  • Peripheral neuropathy \> Grade 1.
  • Prior chemotherapy, EGFR targeted therapy or radiation therapy for HNSCC.
  • History of prior invasive malignancy diagnosed within the last three years other than local stage non-melanoma skin cancer.
  • Be taking cimetidine or allopurinol. Patients must discontinue taking the medication for one week before receiving treatment with Abraxane.
  • Be taking cimetidine or allopurinol. Patients must discontinue taking the medication for one week before receiving treatment with Abraxane.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Washington University School of Medicine

St Louis, Missouri, 63110, United States

Location

Related Publications (18)

  • Department of Veterans Affairs Laryngeal Cancer Study Group; Wolf GT, Fisher SG, Hong WK, Hillman R, Spaulding M, Laramore GE, Endicott JW, McClatchey K, Henderson WG. Induction chemotherapy plus radiation compared with surgery plus radiation in patients with advanced laryngeal cancer. N Engl J Med. 1991 Jun 13;324(24):1685-90. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199106133242402.

    PMID: 2034244BACKGROUND
  • JCO 12:1592, 1194

    BACKGROUND
  • Hitt R, Lopez-Pousa A, Martinez-Trufero J, Escrig V, Carles J, Rizo A, Isla D, Vega ME, Marti JL, Lobo F, Pastor P, Valenti V, Belon J, Sanchez MA, Chaib C, Pallares C, Anton A, Cervantes A, Paz-Ares L, Cortes-Funes H. Phase III study comparing cisplatin plus fluorouracil to paclitaxel, cisplatin, and fluorouracil induction chemotherapy followed by chemoradiotherapy in locally advanced head and neck cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 1;23(34):8636-45. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.00.1990. Epub 2005 Nov 7.

    PMID: 16275937BACKGROUND
  • Burtness B, Goldwasser MA, Flood W, Mattar B, Forastiere AA; Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group. Phase III randomized trial of cisplatin plus placebo compared with cisplatin plus cetuximab in metastatic/recurrent head and neck cancer: an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group study. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Dec 1;23(34):8646-54. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.02.4646.

    PMID: 16314626BACKGROUND
  • Kuperman, et al ASCO 2007

    BACKGROUND
  • Kies, et al ASCO 2006

    BACKGROUND
  • ten Tije AJ, Verweij J, Loos WJ, Sparreboom A. Pharmacological effects of formulation vehicles : implications for cancer chemotherapy. Clin Pharmacokinet. 2003;42(7):665-85. doi: 10.2165/00003088-200342070-00005.

    PMID: 12844327BACKGROUND
  • Sparreboom A, van Zuylen L, Brouwer E, Loos WJ, de Bruijn P, Gelderblom H, Pillay M, Nooter K, Stoter G, Verweij J. Cremophor EL-mediated alteration of paclitaxel distribution in human blood: clinical pharmacokinetic implications. Cancer Res. 1999 Apr 1;59(7):1454-7.

    PMID: 10197613BACKGROUND
  • Winer EP, Berry DA, Woolf S, Duggan D, Kornblith A, Harris LN, Michaelson RA, Kirshner JA, Fleming GF, Perry MC, Graham ML, Sharp SA, Keresztes R, Henderson IC, Hudis C, Muss H, Norton L. Failure of higher-dose paclitaxel to improve outcome in patients with metastatic breast cancer: cancer and leukemia group B trial 9342. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Jun 1;22(11):2061-8. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2004.08.048.

    PMID: 15169793BACKGROUND
  • van Tellingen O, Huizing MT, Panday VR, Schellens JH, Nooijen WJ, Beijnen JH. Cremophor EL causes (pseudo-) non-linear pharmacokinetics of paclitaxel in patients. Br J Cancer. 1999 Sep;81(2):330-5. doi: 10.1038/sj.bjc.6690696.

    PMID: 10496361BACKGROUND
  • Desai N, et al SABCS Dec, 2003

    BACKGROUND
  • Gradishar WJ, Tjulandin S, Davidson N, Shaw H, Desai N, Bhar P, Hawkins M, O'Shaughnessy J. Phase III trial of nanoparticle albumin-bound paclitaxel compared with polyethylated castor oil-based paclitaxel in women with breast cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Nov 1;23(31):7794-803. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.04.937. Epub 2005 Sep 19.

    PMID: 16172456BACKGROUND
  • Gradishar,et al SABCS 2006

    BACKGROUND
  • SABCS 2006

    BACKGROUND
  • Kato Y, Nagashima Y, Baba Y, Kawano T, Furukawa M, Kubota A, Yanoma S, Imagawa-Ishiguro Y, Satake K, Taguchi T, Hata R, Mochimatsu I, Aoki I, Kameda Y, Inayama Y, Tsukuda M. Expression of SPARC in tongue carcinoma of stage II is associated with poor prognosis: an immunohistochemical study of 86 cases. Int J Mol Med. 2005 Aug;16(2):263-8.

    PMID: 16012759BACKGROUND
  • Mendez E, et al Cancer 95:1482-1494, 2005

    BACKGROUND
  • Desai N, et al SABCS Dec, 2004

    BACKGROUND
  • Adkins D, Ley J, Oppelt P, Wildes TM, Gay HA, Daly M, Rich J, Paniello RC, Jackson R, Pipkorn P, Nussenbaum B, Trinkaus K, Thorstad W. nab-Paclitaxel-based induction chemotherapy with or without cetuximab for locally advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma. Oral Oncol. 2017 Sep;72:26-31. doi: 10.1016/j.oraloncology.2017.07.001. Epub 2017 Jul 8.

Related Links

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Squamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and Neck

Interventions

Albumin-Bound PaclitaxelCetuximabCisplatinFluorouracilRadiation

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Carcinoma, Squamous CellCarcinomaNeoplasms, Glandular and EpithelialNeoplasms by Histologic TypeNeoplasmsHead and Neck NeoplasmsNeoplasms by Site

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

PaclitaxelTaxoidsCyclodecanesCycloparaffinsHydrocarbons, AlicyclicHydrocarbons, CyclicHydrocarbonsOrganic ChemicalsDiterpenesTerpenesAlbuminsProteinsAmino Acids, Peptides, and ProteinsAntibodies, Monoclonal, HumanizedAntibodies, MonoclonalAntibodiesImmunoglobulinsImmunoproteinsBlood ProteinsSerum GlobulinsGlobulinsChlorine CompoundsInorganic ChemicalsNitrogen CompoundsPlatinum CompoundsUracilPyrimidinonesPyrimidinesHeterocyclic Compounds, 1-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsPhysical Phenomena

Results Point of Contact

Title
Dr. Douglas R. Adkins
Organization
Washington University School of Medicine

Study Officials

  • Douglas Adkins, M.D.

    Washington Univerisity

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 2
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
SINGLE GROUP
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

August 13, 2008

First Posted

August 18, 2008

Study Start

December 19, 2008

Primary Completion

August 31, 2010

Study Completion

July 6, 2020

Last Updated

September 9, 2020

Results First Posted

January 7, 2014

Record last verified: 2020-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations