Pegfilgrastim and Combination Chemotherapy With or Without Rituximab in Treating Older Patients With Aggressive B-Cell Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma
Randomized Phase II Study About the Application of Pegfilgrastim (Neulasta) at Day 2 or Day 4 Within the Treatment in Patients With Aggressive Non-Hodgkin's Lymphoma Aged 61 to 80 Years With 6 or 8 Cycles of Chemotherapy With CHOP (Cyclophosphamide, Doxorubicin, Vincristine and Prednisone) at 14-day Intervals (CHOP-14), Both With or Without the Monoclonal Anti-CD20 Antibody Rituximab
3 other identifiers
interventional
109
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
RATIONALE: Drugs used in chemotherapy, such as cyclophosphamide, doxorubicin, and vincristine, work in different ways to stop the growth of cancer cells, either by killing the cells or by stopping them from dividing. Colony-stimulating factors, such as pegfilgrastim, may increase the number of immune cells found in bone marrow or peripheral blood and may help the immune system recover from the side effects of chemotherapy. Monoclonal antibodies, such as rituximab, can block cancer growth in different ways. Some find cancer cells and kill them or carry cancer-killing substances to them. Others interfere with the ability of cancer cells to grow and spread. It is not yet known whether combination chemotherapy and pegfilgrastim is more effective when given with or without rituximab in treating non-Hodgkin lymphoma. PURPOSE: This phase II trial is studying the side effects of giving pegfilgrastim and combination chemotherapy together with or without rituximab and to see how well it works in treating older patients with aggressive B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for phase_2 lymphoma
Started May 2004
Typical duration for phase_2 lymphoma
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2004
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
July 31, 2008
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
August 1, 2008
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2012
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2012
CompletedJuly 7, 2021
July 1, 2021
7.8 years
July 31, 2008
July 2, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
comparison of pegfilgrastim day 4 versus day 2 for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced leukocytopenia
median of two measurements of hemoglobin, leukocyte and platelet counts per chemotherapy cycle per Patient in correlation with median pegfilgrastim serum levels at day 1 of the next chemotherapy cycle
through chemotherapy administration (up to 112 days respectively)
comparison of pegfilgrastim day 4 versus day 2 for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced leukocytopenia
rates and grades of leukocytopenias and infections according to NCI-CTC criteria (version 2)
through chemotherapy administration (up to 112 days respectively)
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Adherence to therapy regimens
through chemotherapy administration (up to 112 days respectively)
Antitumor effectivity
median time of observation up to 3 years
Disease-free survival
median time of observation up to 3 years
Study Arms (2)
Arm I (without rituximab)
ACTIVE COMPARATORPatients receive pegfilgrastim subcutaneously (SC) on day 2 or 4 and CHOP comprising cyclophosphamide IV, doxorubicin IV, vincristine IV on day 1, and oral prednisone on days 1-5. Treatment repeats every 2 weeks for up to 6-8 courses in the absence of disease progression or unacceptable toxicity.
Arm II (with rituximab)
EXPERIMENTALPatients receive pegfilgrastim and CHOP for up to 6-8 courses as in arm I. They also receive rituximab (administered 2 hours before beginning CHOP) on day 1. Treatment with rituximab repeats every 2 weeks for up to 8 courses.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
Contact the study team to discuss eligibility requirements. They can help determine if this study is right for you.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Zwick C, Hartmann F, Zeynalova S, Poschel V, Nickenig C, Reiser M, Lengfelder E, Peter N, Schlimok G, Schubert J, Schmitz N, Loeffler M, Pfreundschuh M; German High-Grade Non-Hodgkin Lymphoma Study Group. Randomized comparison of pegfilgrastim day 4 versus day 2 for the prevention of chemotherapy-induced leukocytopenia. Ann Oncol. 2011 Aug;22(8):1872-7. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdq674. Epub 2011 Feb 3.
PMID: 21292644BACKGROUNDMuller C, Murawski N, Wiesen MH, Held G, Poeschel V, Zeynalova S, Wenger M, Nickenig C, Peter N, Lengfelder E, Metzner B, Rixecker T, Zwick C, Pfreundschuh M, Reiser M. The role of sex and weight on rituximab clearance and serum elimination half-life in elderly patients with DLBCL. Blood. 2012 Apr 5;119(14):3276-84. doi: 10.1182/blood-2011-09-380949. Epub 2012 Feb 15.
PMID: 22337718DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Frank Hartmann, MD
Universitaetsklinikum des Saarlandes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
July 31, 2008
First Posted
August 1, 2008
Study Start
May 1, 2004
Primary Completion
February 1, 2012
Study Completion
February 1, 2012
Last Updated
July 7, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-07